It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Foppezao
It was a metaphor [but really happenend]
If i was the hotel owner or chef i wouldnt allowed that since, most of the budget is spend on food[they drink me rich, they eat me poor ], and actually in most parts of France it is forbidden to picknick at a restaurant..which should be normal...
but back on topic.
It scars me this is happening next door to me, and it shouldnt happen at all in the EU..Domestic issues should not be judged by an Imam or mullah, we have a written constitution and i know the Uk only has a partly written constitution and part common law, those Sharia laws should not be part of that common law, and the written constitution or jurisprudence should make that clear...
[edit on 30-6-2009 by Foppezao]
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by Foppezao
It was a metaphor [but really happenend]
If i was the hotel owner or chef i wouldnt allowed that since, most of the budget is spend on food[they drink me rich, they eat me poor ], and actually in most parts of France it is forbidden to picknick at a restaurant..which should be normal...
but back on topic.
It scars me this is happening next door to me, and it shouldnt happen at all in the EU..Domestic issues should not be judged by an Imam or mullah, we have a written constitution and i know the Uk only has a partly written constitution and part common law, those Sharia laws should not be part of that common law, and the written constitution or jurisprudence should make that clear...
[edit on 30-6-2009 by Foppezao]
My opinion goes as, what consenting people do with their own lives INSIDE of current law, is no ones business.
If family A thinks a sharia court would suit them in order to deal with a domestic dispute and no crime has been comitted, then before the law of the land they have every right to do so.
Once a law is broken, then by all means it is another matter.
However I agree with you in regards to having this written into a binding legal common law. No way. That I would argue against tooth and nail, simply because that indeed opens a door to abuse.
That is the slippery slope I was referring to previously.
Still, there is that WHEN that we need to look at, and not confuse the issues prior.
If any party involved in arbitration does not feel they are being treated fairly the matter can be referred to the main legal system.
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
If we were to go on holiday over to an Islamic country
Then as a good citizen knowing the laws of their land and understanding their culture, you would abide by their laws and rules.
Or why the effing hell would you go there?
To be honest, I'm getting tired of the hate. hate for Muslims, hate for Jews, hate for anything different or unusual, hate in politics...the only consistent thing I see these days is hate.
Originally posted by Laurauk
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I have posted under this topic, and I was classed as racist because of it. I find it bizzarre that people defends a law which discriminates against women. I donot care what anyone says that is what sharia law is, it favours the male, rather than the female.
Knows I will be shot downinflame for saying so but it is true.
Originally posted by Foppezao
Actually i am stunned..law only applies for people who recognize the court..still what would happen with women's right..
Incredible how London/Albion allows these courts next to its own common law...
Hope this will wake up the UK and beyond...
www.dailymail.c o.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Laurauk
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I have posted under this topic, and I was classed as racist because of it. I find it bizzarre that people defends a law which discriminates against women. I donot care what anyone says that is what sharia law is, it favours the male, rather than the female.
Knows I will be shot downinflame for saying so but it is true.
Originally posted by Retseh
Who cares, the UK is finished anyway, this is just like kicking a dead horse.
My only concern is that when they have figured out what a nightmare they have managed to create over there, they run East, not West.
And to think it was one of the most beautiful countries in the world once upon a time, I have never seen anything nicer than an English country estate.
Truly tragic, oh well, it's their country, if they want to trash it, it's not really any of our business.
Originally posted by Mr Gunter
The IRA had their own form of justice too.
Kneecappings, kidnapping, murder.
The issue here (Sharia Law) will resolve itself over the course of a generation or two, when the young kids will reject Islam in favour of being able to make up ones own mind regarding religious matters, without the fear of retribution, ridicule, or revenge.
Islamic courts will fail. It'll just take time.
The only way to accelerate it would be for some type of IRA style justice detailed above to occur and make it onto the front page of every UK daily.
Some argue that the cultural argument within Sharia for the rights of women states that Muslim women by virtue of accepting Islam voluntarily submit themselves to obeying their husbands and the veil. The veil is considered a sign of modesty, so that she may be regarded as an intelligent human and not merely an object of desire. Some also argue that according to Sharia's concept of blood money (Diyya) a woman is worth half that of a man.
The European Court of Human Rights: "[T]he Court considers that sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it. [...] It is difficult to declare one's respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia, which clearly diverges from Convention values, particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervenes in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."[94]
So you're demanding all the Jews go back to Israel then?
Originally posted by neformore
Originally posted by Daisy-Lola
British Law is not a choice, it's part of being British. It has it's own rules and regulations.
Yes.
And allowing arbitration between parties is one of them.