Timewave Zero - Countdown to Transition

What to Expect On Dec. 21, 2012: The Moment of Ascension

(A channeled message from Cosmic Awareness, April 2009)

More on Earth’s Rotation and the Days of Darkness

This Awareness is prepared to introduce a new understanding of what will occur during the time of Ascension, especially around the forecast date of December 21, 2012. On that date, which will be the moment of Ascension (this Awareness has already presented in the past that that actual date, December 21st 2012, may not be exactly the correct date due to certain shifts and changes in the calendar; even if this happens sooner, the same principle applies).

The Alignment of the 7 Planetary Gateways

From that which is the central sun of the galaxy, that which is Halcyon in the Pleiadian system, at that moment of the alignment of the 7 planetary gateways represented by the planets, the stars, there will be an alignment, a corridor directly from that which is the central planet to the planet earth. Earth is already moving forward towards this moment of alignment by adjusting and advancing many levels of consciousness, both in its own planetary consciousness as well as many of those Light Workers and Wanderers and beings who exist on the earthly plane at this time, and who have chosen to come onto the planet at this time to assist this process.

When the Portals Open a Tsunami of Energy Will Hit Our Planet

At that actual moment of complete alignment where the 7 gateways are opened, there will be an energetic force that will travel from the central sun to the planet earth, but the 7 gateways are the same gateways that the human soul either passes through as it descends into human form, or upon release of human form, passes through on the way to Its greater expression of being. With the opening of these energy portals, these gateways, when the alignment occurs with the central sun, the force that will go through will be that force which will carry the planet to its higher frequencies. It will be as if a tsunami of energies that hit the planet at that time.

It is for this reason that it is necessary for those who will ascend to have raised their consciousness to a point so that when the energies hit, they will simply ride the wave and come to the new shoreline. In this time, events can occur such as a time of darkness, the shifting of the North/South poles, the shifting of the planet, the turning over of the planet. Those who are of that higher level of consciousness, that higher frequency, will not be destroyed by the tsunami of cosmic energies and consciousness that will overwhelm the planet. They will be carried upwards or forwards to that new state of consciousness, that new level of vibration and frequency.

PART TWO FOLLOWS IN NEXT POST

What to Expect On Dec. 21, 2012: The Moment of Ascension - PART 2

(A channeled message from Cosmic Awareness, April 2009)

Long Predicted Catastrophic Consequences Await the Masses

Those who do not achieve that higher level of consciousness that will allow them to surf this energy wave will be affected most negatively by it. It is at this time that the catastrophic consequences that have for so long been predicted by so many will indeed affect a majority of the beings on the planet. Many will at that time leave physical existence through the death experience. This will become their way of removing themselves for there is no wish on their part to experience that which will come, as those who survive this period of time experience the reality of a new physical world, that being the energies of that planet which this Awareness has called Planet B in the past. (Note: Planet B is the remaining physical 3D planet and Planet A is the 4D planet that ascends – the planet will actually split into two different realities, frequencies and timelines.)

Those who choose to simply leave will reenter spirit form and it will be their choice whether to continue existence on that which is Planet A or Planet B or any other dimension that they choose, for it is the choice on the spirit level that is relevant to what experience one would have in whatever dimension of consciousness one would choose. They would thus be free to make whatever choice they would wish to make. Those who survive the catastrophic consequence of a planet stopping its rotation, of its poles shifting, of even the planet tipping over on its axis, will find that they truly do live in another reality than that which was the norm such a short time before.

The Coming Cosmic Tsunami and the Elite on Earth

All that was will have been swept away, and they will be reduced to a most basic and primitive state. There will be those who will anticipate this event, who will have prepared for this event, and those are the ones this Awareness has called the Elite in the past. They will have with them those who would serve them, those who would be party to that experience, but there will be many who survive at the most primitive level on a planet that no longer is as it once was. This too could be a consequence for those who wish to experience this form of reality of a cosmic tsunami that would hit and will hit the planet at that time, but it is only one of the consequences, for there are other ways that one will pass through this experience, either by leaving the physical or by ascending on the crest of the wave to that which is Planet A, the ascended higher level of consciousness.
This energy will be the purest energy of consciousness as it sweeps over the planet, but it will have at the same time, a direct physical result that if one is not fully prepared for, could nave devastating consequences. This Awareness understands It has opened a new door at this time and It invites any and all further questions from those who would seek to understand this matter to an even higher degree.

Do you know Who, In Fact, You Really Are?

This is a comparison of Galactic walls with Timewave.
I took a big enough portion of TW with enough big peaks and valleys and overlaid it on the graph.

Overlapping the valleys with the peaks (walls) gave a good enough match. In fact, the Galactic walls are regularly spaced so even the peaks would match, if translated by one period. However the valleys in TW represents novelty so its more meaningful to overlap it over a wall which represents a large amount of galaxies.

So we see here that whenever TW takes a dip (novelty) there are many galaxies and when there are peaks (nothing interesting going on) there is a lot of void. (I'm not claiming anything though, its all an experiment)


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/5e4bfaae39a0e060.jpg[/atsimg]

[edit on 3/7/2009 by rocksolidbrain]

evasius... where's the screenshot for the first 2 weeks of july and the resonance for the 1790's? Did I miss it? The last screenshot went to june 30, right? Am I missing it in the previous posts?

reply to post by ashdesilentio


Here is the screenshot that I get for the first two weeks in July using the timewave2012 program:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ef0c3f07d8aa.png[/atsimg]

There appears to be a little dip tomorrow and on the ninth. It seems that there is a general upward trend, toward habit, though.

Here is the resonance graph:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a300358988fe.png[/atsimg]

So, the upcoming week resonates with August 28, 1790 to October 4, 1792.

oh i see... using the watkins set. is that what evasius was using originally? anyone care to weigh in on the merits of each different set available on the timewave2012.com calculator?

reply to post by rocksolidbrain


I'm unsure about why the 2 would even be compared though. Other than the idea that the zero point on the timewave would be the "edge of the known universe". We see time as novelty all the way to zero date, and it is a laid over a graph that shows galactic "walls" with relation to distance (from earth I assume) in megaparsecs. Why would relative distance from earth have anything at all to do with the timewave. Couldn't this be a simple coincidence?

All I'm saying is this..You can't extract meaning from such a graph since it doesn't make sense to make assumptions about things we don't understand. And even if both novelty and galactic walls are represented accurately in your depiction, there isn't any way to know if it means anything in the first place. I understand why you posted it. But the brick wall exists since there's no way of knowing what is a correlation and what is a coincidence.

-ChriS

reply to post by BlasteR


You are absolutely right, there is no anchor point here to fix the zero of TW on to. So this comparison is not perfect.

The zero of the graph is earth's location and we are looking out from there towards the boundary of the universe. In fact we are inside one of the walls. So the zero is relative. But it will not matter because the walls are periodic, you can stand anywhere and the pattern will be same, more or less.

The TW is not periodic, but fractal. Parts of it as same as whole. So it wont matter which part I take.

I was simply trying to match the periodicity of galactic walls with valleys. Not trying to fit dates etc with galactic patterns. As we know the dates are "stuck over" the TW arbitrarily. But the trend matters.

As the TW represents many kinds of novelties, and not only the kind pertaining to the galactic distribution, the valleys shall occur anywhere, including the ones for galaxies, and so it will never match perfectly, even if this whole TW is true.

You may ask why trying to compare space with a wave which represents time. There is a deep relation between space and time. You may like to see how standing waves in time relate to space. How matter is nothing but standing waves, and how time is just one aspect of it.

When i type in a certain date it comes up with the time, is that GMT?

2ndline

tsom87

reply to post by ashdesilentio


I used the Watkins because someone earlier in the thread said that Watkins is the one that Evasius' TWZ program uses. I don't know much about the others, except that the Kelley calculation almost lines up exactly with the Watkins calculation.

reply to post by TSOM87


We're not exactly sure what the timezone is. I, and Evasius I think, think that the time is GMT. So, all you'd have to do is subtract six hours if you're in E(D)ST in the US.

So with the 24th having a dip what dose that mean, something bad is going to happen or just something big i.e independance day?

tsom87

reply to post by TSOM87


I don't think it necessarily means that something bad will happen. Just something will happen, and we will start moving toward "habit" again. The dip today isn't that big either, so it could be something relatively small. Many North Korea shooting off seven missiles is the event in today's dip.

By-the-way, habit is essentially "normalcy". So, as we move toward habit, people become more complacent and things are "normal". Then, the dips are called "novelty". As we move toward novelty, the world starts moving toward something happening that changes things. Afterward, we start moving back toward habit. I think it's when the dips into novelty are large and steep that makes the event more important.

Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by ashdesilentio

 

I used the Watkins because someone earlier in the thread said that Watkins is the one that Evasius' TWZ program uses. I don't know much about the others, except that the Kelley calculation almost lines up exactly with the Watkins calculation.

hmmm...

I have the program Evasius uses (TWZ 4.30) and it uses Kelley numbers only, Fractal Time v1.23 can use 4 different sets of numbers, and the java calc at timewave2012.com can use 5 sets of numbers.

Kelley and Watkins are almost the same - but if you read Watkin's paper - youll see he is refuting that the TWZ is basically useless because of math errors in Kelley's numbers, but he only fixes a portion of it with his numbers, and if you read Sheliak's paper he further corrects the math errors that Watkins had attempted to fix in his paper, making Sheliak's number set by far the most accurate (and from what I hear the number set McKenna preferred)

Links:
Watkins paper:
The Watkins Objection
Sheliak's paper:
A Mathematical and Philosophical Re-Examination of the Foundations of TimeWave Zero and Novelty Theory

reply to post by dviper785

making Sheliak's number set by far the most accurate (and from what I hear the number set McKenna preferred)

Thanks for sharing! Earlier today, I actually took the time to read the homepage of the timewave2012 website and it said the same that you just stated: initially McKenna used the Kelley set and then later on, he prefered the Sheliak set.

Interesting to know that the Fractal Time software uses the Kelley set. Perhaps as I continue using timewave2012, I will make the graph with both Kelley and Sheliak, that way what I get lines up with what Evasius shows, and then also I can see the graph based on what McKenna though was the most accurate.

Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by dviper785

 

making Sheliak's number set by far the most accurate (and from what I hear the number set McKenna preferred)

Thanks for sharing! Earlier today, I actually took the time to read the homepage of the timewave2012 website and it said the same that you just stated: initially McKenna used the Kelley set and then later on, he prefered the Sheliak set.

Interesting to know that the Fractal Time software uses the Kelley set. Perhaps as I continue using timewave2012, I will make the graph with both Kelley and Sheliak, that way what I get lines up with what Evasius shows, and then also I can see the graph based on what McKenna though was the most accurate.

Yes originally when I started following this thread I was using watkins numbers but then I found Sheliak's paper providing the equations and explanations and I have to admit I don't understand all of the math in it but from what I could it was very convincing

he provides data/event association comparison in the conclusion as well

links posted above

Try this page world history vlib.iue.it...

here a nice time line to use for refrence

www.hyperhistory.com...

Im sorry but im checking the 2001 period and i see that there is nothing significant in the graph while there was the 911 attack a mayor world event and there is nothing... just strange to be honoust

correction there is something and the graph at the time th planes hit and it shows when you zoom in on the time line 1 hour and 32 mins time span

there is a big drop in the line when the towers collapse at 0950am hmmm interesting....


its dropping like crazy that day but only when you zoom in you can see the difference



[edit on 5-7-2009 by soundmatrix2009]

[edit on 5-7-2009 by soundmatrix2009]

[edit on 5-7-2009 by soundmatrix2009]

reply to post by soundmatrix2009

If you don't accept the official story the Timewave makes a lot more sense.The hard part is picking the Novelty from the Habit.Look at the resonance.