It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GriffinRD
2.) Solar flares from the sun
3.) C.M.E. from the sun
--
It is my opinion that you can cross these off of the list. We can still see the sun with SOHO, STEREO, telescopes, the naked eye..
Originally posted by OmegaLogos I'll stick with Occams razor thanks!
Originally posted by zorgon
reply to post by OmegaLogos
But can you PLEASE tell me what a fnord is
Originally posted by OmegaLogos
reply to post by GriffinRD
Explanation: I fully agree and I'm wondering if the USA might of parted ways with any RPNBB's [robust penetrating nuclear bunker busters] or would they be so bold as to drop them themselves?
Personal Disclosure: Maybe they'll crank up HAARP at the same time so if anything funky does happen in the atmosphere/magnetosphere then they'll have a diversionary excuse???
Originally posted by mnemeth1
They don't want us looking at the data because it doesn't jive with their pre-conceived notions of what space rocks hitting earths atmosphere are supposed to do. I'd bet my bottom dollar this lock down of information was requested by top scientists. This didn't come from the military.
Detonations producing gamma radiation are not supposed to occur from simple rocks slamming into an atmosphere.
The detonations denote a larger force at work, namely the electric force.
The earth is bathed in a charged plasma field. More energy than all the nations of world would ever need to power mankind forever.
They don't want us digging around and coming forward with a discovery that would put the energy cartels out of business.
Originally posted by TrueBritFurther more the information comming from those satellites is supposed to be used to give the Military a warning should someone launch a nuke, or prepare to do so.
Originally posted by zorgon
This is about something else... what I don't know yet