Three Clear Photographs of Black Triangle over South Carolina

Originally posted by atsbeliever
Nice pics but its a bit too conveniently framed, dead center..like the photog wasn't even phased by it? And only 3 pics?

I wouldn't say that is impossible. The last UFO sighting I had I only had time to get one picture, and I conciously tried to centre the shot as best as I possibly could.

However, these pics do look to me as if someone has taken an normal photo, cut a segment out and softened the edges.

Like so.

I knocked that up in two minutes, and I know next to bugger-all about using photo editing software.


*Edit to change would to wouldn't in the first line. My bad.

[edit on 10/6/09 by sotp]

Originally posted by daniel_g
sight..

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/968478ffcba7.jpg[/atsimg]

A simple filter shows a black border around the 'craft'. Whoever did this picture drew the border first, then filled inside with black color. If this was a craft, texture would be uniform.

[edit on 10-6-2009 by daniel_g]

I agree 100%. This appears to have no dimension at all. Just looks like a shape was cut out of the picture and filled in with black.

It looks too small to me... thats definately not the 2x football field sized triangle i've read about

if i were to guess, i'd say it was a test of a stealth drone...

I don't want to cry hoax for the fun of it but this looks like a kite or something man made the reason being the craft is very very low and the photo doesn't really show to much detail.

Don't get me wrong I want it to be a FT but in this case I am not convinced.

For the record I believe that FT'S are man made built with crashed alien craft technology, I am certain they can fly outside of our own atmosphere.

Originally posted by fibonacci

Originally posted by daniel_g
sight..

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/968478ffcba7.jpg[/atsimg]

A simple filter shows a black border around the 'craft'. Whoever did this picture drew the border first, then filled inside with black color. If this was a craft, texture would be uniform.

[edit on 10-6-2009 by daniel_g]

I agree 100%. This appears to have no dimension at all. Just looks like a shape was cut out of the picture and filled in with black.

It could be pasted on a piece of glass and then photographed to make it appear to be in the sky. It's different from the first too.


Lucky a mod didn't close this thread and direct you here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Time of the month I suppose.

[edit on 10-6-2009 by mandroid]

My mother told me she saw something similiar a few months ago.

I actually just showed her these photo's, and she told me it is almost the exact same thing she saw.

doesnt look real at all..

Originally posted by peacejet
The photos are perfect. Best evidence of aliens visiting us. A flag for this thread.

Re-hee-heeally... ahem...

so because it flies and doesn't look like a plane you usually see.. it's automatically alien.

riiiight.

better start researching the nazi bell craft and following prototypes buddy.

60-70+ yrs of development does not = alien.

not saying aliens don't exist.

just saying you, cannot distinguish the source of the engineering from a photo.

have you disassembled it, or read the schematics for it in detail and had top level black-ops engineers corroborate that it's not their handi work reverse engineered or not?

you don't know.
it's not evidence.

even talking to something that looks smells and feels like an alien might not be what it says it is..
might not be what IT believes it is.

could have been genetically engineered here.. and brought up to think it was from outerspace.

you don't know.

no absolutes here until there is no ability to lie...
or no reason to.

-

The first thing I thought of when I saw these is that the object is too clear to be at an appropriate distance from the camera to be a true flying object OR the object is very small and close to the lens.

Either way, I don't think this object is legit.

reply to post by Horza


The argument at this point illustrates some other points I made. It doen't matter about the vid I made onor the explanation. Everyone is going to claim whatever they feel like it.

Exposure from the outside in.. Yes it does indicate it's really there. Perfect example is a world trade center photo you could probably dig up by googling "sun, light inbetween twin towers" a back lit subject has light creep in around the edges.. over exposing an object that's backlit invariably is lighter around the edges than in the center.

also, I'm not explaining that the object is sharp because of the .jpg compression, I was just illustrating the contrast is easy for the camera to pick up..

motion blur? I addressed this earlier to.. if people claim "it should be blurry' then they should say the trtees aren't really there either.. It's all about the capability of the camera.. iso settinng and so on..

b

b

b

There is a problem. The image is not 'set' in the photograph. It seems to be on top of the photo. The object is not taking the lighting characteristics that it should. Or so it seems.

reply to post by ufoptics

thats exactly what i was thinking

Originally posted by peacejet
The photos are perfect. Best evidence of aliens visiting us. A flag for this thread.

How does this craft serve as evidence to aliens coming to visit us? Whilst I believe in ETs, I also believe the majority of "UFOs" arent actually visitors from space, but government technologies that have been black ops since WW.

Search for the arrivals on facebook if you have not watched this documentary already, episode 19/20/21, it all makes sense!

MY vote is with the NASA ScramJet. Very cool pics, but it almost just looks like a geometrical shape thats been photoshopped in... theres no distinct anything about it except its shape and color, no windows, you said no sound, no lights... but of course there doesnt always have to be. Nice find, worth discussion!
-Z-

Originally posted by peacejet
The photos are perfect. Best evidence of aliens visiting us. A flag for this thread.

Wrong. Digital photos are the easiest to photo shop. HIGH RESOLUTION video footage is the best kind of proof over the internet.

I wanted to see how easy this would be to duplicate in photoshop.

Here is what I came up with, it took me no longer then 10 minutes.


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dc3b090109e0.jpg[/atsimg]







[edit on 10-6-2009 by lucentenigma]

Does anyone remember the pictures of another triangle taken over South Carolina in March? I wonder if this is the same guy. Here is the link to UFO Casebook for the pictures.

www.ufocasebook.com...

i would bet money that several countries have craft similar to this. and for the record, it looks BA

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0b41965e2e70.jpg[/atsimg]

Duplicated (and inproved by adding some depth to them the originals lack) , done in photohop in 3 mins.


Wayne...

reply to post by lucentenigma


That's awesome. It shows how easily this can be made. I guess I don't know at this point what it would take for evidence.

Thanks