Whats going on here!!?? Taymour

Originally posted by Juston

For those like me who do not know that much or appreciate AU's, here is a short video detailing the actual distance between planets.

Excellent vid!!!

Originally posted by zorgon
Most of us here can recognize a Lunar Orbiter image from a Clementine Image from an Apollo image. The MGS (Mars Global Surveyor are also unigue as are the HiRise images

Ha Ha! You gotta be sh*ittin me! LOL I can barely tell the diffence between a shiny star and a planet!

I don't like looking up cos the birds are always wiating for that one chance!

Originally posted by hey1212
I can barely tell the diffence between a shiny star and a planet!

The ones that twinkle are the stars...

I said 'most of us'

As for the birds... this will help... comes in camouflage

An "AU", or Astronomical Unit is approximately the mean orbital distance from the Earth to the Sun. It equals 93,000,000 miles (million).



Zorgon: I have already looked over many images from multiple probes, I have found no terrain match, but maybe you can.

Originally posted by zorgon As for the birds... this will help... comes in camouflage

That guy looks far too serious!

[edit on 12/6/09 by hey1212]

Originally posted by jkrog08
An "AU", or Astronomical Unit is approximately the mean orbital distance from the Earth to the Sun. It equals 93,000,000 miles (million).

Meh... just a trip to the park in them thar new-fangled secret spaceships, no biggee

Zorgon: I have already looked over many images from multiple probes, I have found no terrain match, but maybe you can.

Themis? Mars Express? Cassini for Saturn? The moon Titan?

reply to post by zorgon


Yes to all....Well I don't know about Themis, you might wanna check that out, but the others yes.

Taymour is full of #.
Two line post

wow..I can't say # on here? How about arsecandle?

Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 13-6-2009 by asala]

reply to post by Iremonger



Arsecandle appears to be fine.

Hmmm well the Mars Express images do bear a resemblance in texture, but nothing conclusive yet

However I did spot this in passing

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b480b903047e.png[/atsimg]

Some nice structures in this one... not bad at all

Oh I guess ya need the detail huh?

Well okay

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/971a117d7f36.png[/atsimg]

The top one looks like a stack of rectangular structures with a bright shiny roof and a four segment access tube on the right. The 'artifact' is situated right against the edge of a mountain that give the appearance in might be an entrance structure for the mountain.

I like this one

[edit on 12-6-2009 by zorgon]

reply to post by zorgon


None of those are in the same color, nor match the terrain of the images provided by Taymour. I do not think the images come from Mars, I was thinking a Jovian or Saturnian satellite more than anything, maybe an asteroid.

Originally posted by jkrog08
None of those are in the same color, nor match the terrain of the images provided by Taymour

I know but it jumped out at me... had to save it for later

Besides what else is there to do here till we get the goods?

[edit on 12-6-2009 by zorgon]

Originally posted by hey1212

Originally posted by StevesResearch
This Taymour character, IF he is sitting on actual proof

Yea its that little word that means so much.

How many threads here has that little word started? Its a real star!

Here's a

for IF. Keep up the good work little man.

Little man?

We need to see something more substantial than what has been shown so far. I've seen more impressive photos on the Mars Anomalies Research site.

We're waiting Taymour.

[edit on 13-6-2009 by StevesResearch]

reply to post by StevesResearch


Research, Steve.
Examine and research, Steve.
Verify carefully and Research, Steve.
This is all that we can do: RESEARCH.
Skilled Analysts as you are welcome.

taymour have u posted any photos or videos yet?of have you gotten any results as to what the material u have might be?

Originally posted by Taymour

Evidence, Taymour.
Display the Evidence, Taymour.
Distribute and Display the Evidence, Taymour.
This is what I can do: EVIDENCE.
Soon Answers will be need to shown

reply to post by IMSAM


I have only one skilled report from Prof. Nardi (italian geologist) who said that anomalies into images, IF reals, are not naturals. He said that his opinion is that images may be microscopics pics. When I said: "no, some of those anomalies and structures are on area of dozens Km. square", he said: "impossible!" and never talk to me.
May be he thought that I'm joke whit him...
At this moment, there are NO ANSWER from Analysts.

reply to post by hey1212


Do you seen something "strange" in some images?
Do you seen something "anomalous"?
Do you think that is an hoax or fake?
Do you see only dust, rocks, paredolia experience, or simply digital trash?