Whats going on here!!?? Taymour

To me, the supposed "city landscape" looks very similar to this:

upload.wikimedia.org...
Perhaps the images submitted by taymour are simply an unfocused shot of something similar to this?

[edit on 4-6-2009 by scobro]

Originally posted by zorgon
Making a statement that its fake before all the cards are on the table puts you in the same category as those presenting images without source IMO of course

I totally agree - it is your opinion.
How many facts does one wait for before coming to a conclusion? It's the not the number of facts dear boy, but rather the quality of the material presented.

Originally posted by zorgon
It is never safe to assume anything, because invariably one will eat crow.

That's the risk anyone takes when they come to a conclusion on something. What defines someone, is their willingness to not let their ego get in the way of recanting - something I actually told Antonio I was prepared to do in an earlier post.

Originally posted by zorgon
Maybe, but maybe 'they' know I would only deal with it with source provided

Same beef I have with Hoagland's stuff

Same here dear boy - I've based my comments solely on the material that has been thus far provided to the board.

On a side note, I think you need to take your ego out of the equation when it comes to posting on the board. My answering all the points you've raised is based purely on your ego being dinted - as made evident by the fact you have not bothered to challenge Chadwickus - the guy who raised this very reasonable judgement in the first place.

I find that amusing.

Originally posted by scobro
To me, the supposed "city landscape" looks very similar to this:

upload.wikimedia.org...
Perhaps the images submitted by taymour are simply an unfocused shot of something similar to this?
[edit on 4-6-2009 by scobro]

Good point

I was actually thinking along the same lines scobro. Particularly the possibility of EM scans as suggested by one of the geologists corresponding with MysterE.

Gentelmen, please...


Let's just all CALM DOWN here and take a breather and just wait and see. There is no need to argue and fight. Everyone on this thread has provided GREAT INSIGHTS. Let us just chill out.

reply to post by scobro


It is possible, but some of the structures seen appear to be more than just what nature could do IMO. That doesn't mean they aren't within the limits of what a hoaxer could do however!

Taymour

I have sent you a email, so if you are lurking please check it. Also in my opinion your source and you shouldn't fear disclosing everything. Because if it is truly 'Earth shattering' as you claim then I am SURE everyone will forgive you for your "breach of confidentiality" and probably look at you as a hero, as well your source. There is MUCH more danger in KEEPING the information than SPREADING the information, ALL the information.

Originally posted by jkrog08
Let's just all CALM DOWN here and take a breather and just wait and see. Let us just chill out.

Yep! I'm headin' for the beer bar for some chilled Budweiser!



I hope Taymour returns before I'm pissed out!! The way this thread is headed I suspect that's what's gonna happen!! Jeeez!

Cheers!

[edit on 4-6-2009 by mikesingh]

reply to post by jkrog08


I see a toy martian head (complete with antennae) looking right at camera...kind of like the "grey" in that other image...hmmmm.

reply to post by mikesingh


Where was the "What?" after your post Mike!


It would have fit in good,lol. I am serous, I am not being an a-hole I did really like it,lol.

Here I'll do it for you.

Yes I hope we see Taymour soon and get some ground breaking evidence, what?

reply to post by Cole DeSteele


I can't find the image but one of the 'creatures' posted near a rock or cave looked A LOT like that multi-legged beast in the new Star Trek movie.

Originally posted by scobro
To me, the supposed "city landscape" looks very similar to this:

upload.wikimedia.org...
Perhaps the images submitted by taymour are simply an unfocused shot of something similar to this?

[edit on 4-6-2009 by scobro]

Boom. This is what I was thinking as well...just the shots I find are soooo HD it's hard to compare...specially e-trom mic pics

Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by mikesingh

 

Where was the "What?" after your post Mike!
It would have fit in good,lol. I am serous, I am not being an a-hole I did really like it,lol.
Here I'll do it for you.
Yes I hope we see Taymour soon and get some ground breaking evidence, what?

Blistering barnacles! You want me to get screwed again, what??

Cheers!

Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by Cole DeSteele

 

I can't find the image but one of the 'creatures' posted near a rock or cave looked A LOT like that multi-legged beast in the new Star Trek movie.

Could you be referring to the cone-head crab in the cave pic? Admittedly, that one is my fav. You can actually see a foreleg stepping outside of the cave...

reply to post by mikesingh





Now it is official!

Have a good time friend, hopefully when you get back we will have some "ground quaking information".......Then I guess me and you won't need to make any more threads right?lol



Reply to Cole DeSteele:

Yes that is EXACTLY what I am referring too! Did you notice it too then?



[edit on 6/4/2009 by jkrog08]

Originally posted by mikesingh
I hope Taymour returns before I'm pissed out!! The way this thread is headed I suspect that's what's gonna happen!! Jeeez!

[edit on 4-6-2009 by mikesingh]

Your right Mike. The information we have is inconclusive AT BEST!

The ball is in your court Taymour. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Reguards
-E-

reply to post by jkrog08


Perhaps the images are from the bug planet Klendathu,

www.dark-net.co.uk...



[edit on 4-6-2009 by scobro]

[edit on 4-6-2009 by scobro]

Originally posted by mckyle
reply to post by whiskeypoet

 

whiskeypoet,

Welcome and a very eloquent introductory post indeed

I'll be watching you

mckyle,

Thanks for the welcome, and I assume the star. This is a medium of communication and eloquence in communication is fading courtesy.

First of all, thank you for some great contributions. As i've said, in absence of a source all the images in the OP are a bunch of pixels, nothing more. When i saw them for the first time, i thought that most of them came from Hirise, i could be wrong but it doesn't matter. The REAL problem is that images taken out from their own geological contest and lacking a scale, are nothing more than a bunch of pixels. Some formations could be interesting, depending on the area they came from, but NOTHING in what we see suggest any artificial building, nothing: i was waiting to receive some source, at least one because to look at some image without even knowing from where it comes from is wortless: i won't spent time anymore just because someone won't share his sources. We always have asked for sources, in this case we have been patient given the circumstances but NOW I've decided to give up. I will take this stuff seriously only once i'll see some SOURCE. I just would like to say a big THANK YOU to all those who contributed to this thread, especially the last informations are very interesting. My humble contribute to this thread ends now, and i will change my mind only in presence of some link to some source.

Originally posted by whiskeypoet

mckyle,

Thanks for the welcome, and I assume the star. This is a medium of communication and eloquence in communication is fading courtesy.

Damn! - I like the way you write
You're welcome for the star, and I think another one is in order

Internos my good friend

You've done a job and a half mate, and I personally thank you for it

I think you've gone way above and beyond the call of duty in pursuing this.
I got cynical early in the piece. But you and jkrog08, as well as MysterE, staunchly stuck with it and chased the proverbial rabbit down every hole.

When I catch up with you in Italia, I'm going to have to buy you a beer or two, or three

I find that we are at an impasse as to what the fine ATS members can do. I would love if one of the insiders communicating with Taymour could give their opinion (note the word, opinion) on the trusted agent pics he has disseminated to you.

In regards to the dreaded "disclosure" word; those of us who already hold firm convictions on the issue of ET intelligence and it's variations dont need earth shattering evidence to convince us. "Disclosure" is not for us, it is for the non-believers or the uninterested parties who feel that the subject is not important or worse, think that it is a bunch of hooey.

Alleged orbital shots of Pueblo like cliff dwellings and numerous and many formed EBEs emerging from hidey-holes is not the “earth shattering” evidence that it will take to convince, for example, my wife. She has seen all the evidence I have presented over the years from third-party sources, listened to what I have witnessed at sea and stood by through conjecture and hoax galore. Just as I have never been touched by “Faith” in religion, she has not been touched by faith in the grand subject that we gather here to discuss.

As we speak, on another thread the “fans” are flocking to yet another iteration of the Apollo 20 Hoax, I hope we do not join the same fate…

Hopes of “disclosure” or un-ignorable evidence can ramp us up exponentially. As we get more excited we see synchronicity blooming around us. Then before long we feel the inevitable fall into withdrawal.

We have reached apogee, and so before we begin our fall;

Mr. Taymour / Di Bello, I beseech you to share with us something definitive. You have been researching the right means of dissemination for at least a month. You have whetted our appetites with intellectual hours-de-oeuvres and promised a succulent main course. It is time to serve the meal sir.