It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Well that wouldn't do too good for them since 3 members on this site have the pictures too!
Originally posted by zorgon
Where's MY copy?
Originally posted by triplesod
Mike. I have to ask this, what is with finishing 80% of your sentences with "what?"? I'm pretty sure you aren't a late 18th century senior citizen of the English aristocracy.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Another question is this: If this object resides in the belt how does it get heated? It must have artificial power to support any life there. I don’t know, I am anxious to learn more of this, I just hope it is not another hoax. We do not know much about our outer solar system, as only four probes have ever been there (Voyagers and Pioneers). So it is possible something could be out there IMO.
According to a video tape made by a former C.I.A. agent, John Lear, based upon what he said he witnessed from military agents with top secret security clearances, there are about 70 different extraterrestrial civilizations that have been monitoring the Earth.
There are also reportedly physical being colonies on some of the huge moons orbiting Jupiter and Saturn that even NASA admits contain atmospheres and water, including Lanulous, Titan, Io, Ganymede, etc.
Originally posted by mckyle
reply to post by mikesingh
Mike,
As always, I enjoy anything you post
The problem with this whole thread - as it stands at present - is that we are speculating about speculation, because we have nothing to go on other than vid-caps with no explanation or source, location, etc.
There has been so much positive energy in this thread in the form of analysis and opinion/speculation, but - one has to ask - to what end?
Taymour really needs to come clean now, or this thread with all it's skilled thinkers and good intentions, will simply burn out.
Thanks for taking the time to answer the questions of people like myself. Attached are a few images I found on the internet, and was wondering what your opinion of them was,
since I have no clue!
Thanks for your time!
*
One of the most interesting aspects of geology is scale. The pictures you
sent look great, but I don't know what scale they are. Are they shot from
a microscope, or from space? They could be crystal lattice structure on
the surface of a grain of sand, or mountain landscape patterns photographed
during a fly-over from the space shuttle. Hopefully on the website there
is some information as to whether the size of the image is centimeters or
kilometers and we can proceed from there.
If these images are of a mountain landscape pattern, could these formations occure naturally?
Our thoughts are that they look like poor quality SEM or backscatter images but not landscape images
Originally posted by Cds4344
reply to post by MysterE
So this pretty much puts a damper on anything going on in this thread?
Originally posted by MysterE
Originally posted by Cds4344
reply to post by MysterE
So this pretty much puts a damper on anything going on in this thread?
Well, i'm trying to decide what to think about all of this, bc technically if it was an "alien civilization" it wouldn't be a landscape image either. Taymour claims to have more "proof", I think it is time to see something more definative.
-E-
[edit on 4-6-2009 by MysterE]
Originally posted by mikesingh
Originally posted by triplesod
However, if we take the Electric Universe model into account, the interaction of the planet’s/moon’s intrinsic magnetic fields with its magnetosphere can heat the atmosphere. It’s probable that life forms may have adapted to that ambient heat not only of the atmosphere, but also heat from within. Such life forms could possibly thrive under the surface. However, the lack of light would mean that they could have adapted their light sensory organs to see in very low light conditions.
Exactly, these pictures (if real) are showing creatures living beneath the surface. Well, as far as I can tell.
Like I said in a previous post, they aren't pictures of crystalline structures.
[edit on 4-6-2009 by nunya13]
Originally posted by MysterE
reply to post by hey1212
Your signature just made me spew coffee on my keyboard! Hilarious! Anyways, I'm interested to see what the other geologist I contacted thinks of the images, as well as the one jkrog emailed.
-E-