It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
portland.indymedia.org...
Based on chemical analysis of WTC structural steel residue, a Brigham Young University physics professor has identified the material as Thermate. Thermate is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur cases the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue.
posted by esdad71
Ar far as Preston, rock on bud. Keep up the good work
posted by esdad71
Ar far as Swampfox, rock on bud. Keep up the good work for our country
[edit on 30-5-2009 by esdad71]
[edit on 30-5-2009 by esdad71]
At 21:54 GMT on 9/11/2001 the BBC announced that WTC 7 had collapsed. There was just one problem with this news: WTC 7 did not collapse until 22:20 GMT.
The Pentagon was hit at approximately 9:45 Eastern Time, so we're talking about an hour and 40 minutes between the time they knew there was a hijacking and the time the Pentagon was hit. That hijacked plane was flying west from Boston. So they knew it could have been flying to Washington, right? Why didn't they put planes in the air?
www.investigate911.com...
Why weren't standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners followed that day? Answer: On May 31, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld signed a sweeping change in those SOP which, among other things, required his prior authorization before fighter interceptors could be scrambled.... Why weren't the Pentagon's extensive missile batteries and air defenses activated during the attack? Answer: The attack jet was a modified military aircraft with a "friendly" transponder beacon,
which Pentagon anti-aircraft systems were programmed to ignore, as opposed to a "foe" beacon which those systems were correctly programmed to shoot down......
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well, nice to see the mods are on top of THEIR game.
I suppose having the tables turned on one's self does tend to upset, doesn't it?
Well too damn bad. I am sick of being labeled unpatriotic because I can see through the official story lies. Not through blind devotion to the government line, but through careful attention and years of reading and contemplation about the subject. If I was alone in this, I'd be more apt to shut my trap. But clearly I am not. And I object to being called a troll, much less king of the 9/11 trolls at ATS. I feel I have done my part to contribute here at ATS, across many subjects, not just 9/11. In fact, I have contributed the LEAST to the 9/11 forum here out of all my threads.
Ok, self-preservation activated: must put esdad on ignore.
Even more absurd is that fact that not a single official inquiry has attempted to respond to, discredit, or refute the questions that have been raised. On the contrary, both the American government and the complicit media have dealt with the every single challenge to the 9/11 explanations in two ways. They either totally ignore them or dismiss them out of hand as ridiculous conspiracy theories. Most of the well-researched and revealing findings by independent investigators are unknown to the vast majority of Americans.
Time and time again, when I come across close-minded Bush supporters, I witness the effects of an unexplainable phenomenon: a highly dangerous variation of HIV – a condition I call the Hypocrisy & Illogic Virus. Strangely, the most severe symptoms of this condition seem to manifest themselves during any and all discussions of the events of 9/11,..
In fact, we’ll take it all back and admit the errors of our ways IF you do something first. Show us YOUR proof....The facts about 9/11 that has been uncovered are dismissed by people who apply unbelievably skewed logic to their opposing argument. They believe a story when the only proof they use to validate the story is the story itself. That’s it! All they know is what they have been told. News reports, video, witnesses, whistle blowers, their own eyes and even common sense contradict their beliefs. Still, these people continue to accuse the researchers of being either crazy or traitorous. What kind of convoluted reasoning has infected such a large segment of the nation?
This is a battle for truth. It’s not a debate over conflicting philosophies. It is a battle between those who are searching for facts and those who choose to deny that a search is necessary....
The level of denial and resistance can only be explained by understanding a very basic human response: sometimes truth is too painful for people to deal with. In this case, the perpetrators of 9/11 understood that most Americans could not permit themselves to consider the involvement of people within their own government in the dastardly attacks of that day. They could never allow themselves to even consider such a possibility, even though people within the administration had openly professed that just such an event would benefit their cause!
History has proven the U.S. government has repeatedly lied and murdered people, even their own citizens to further what in essence is the gain of a relatively small number of individuals connected to private corporations and the privately held Federal Reserve Bank who runs our government.
Ignorance is the state in which a person lacks knowledge, is unaware of something or chooses to subjectively ignore information. This should not be confused with being unintelligent, as one's level of intelligence and level of education or general awareness are not the same. The word "Ignorant" is an adjective describing a person in the state of being unaware. The term may be used specifically (e.g. "One can be an expert in math, and totally ignorant of history.") or generally (e.g. "an ignorant person.") -- although the second use is used less as a descriptive and more as an imprecise personal insult.
Originally posted by esdad71
9/11 Truth Movement - Conjecture, Opinion and altered videos.
Originally posted by esdad71
A true Lack of evidence regarding explosives
Originally posted by esdad71
A small percentage of a large majority follow these revelations who include FD, PD and scientists as well as other architectural professionals.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Calling straight up BS? Man, how about you jsut say you 'triple dog dare me'
I did not state the 9/11 truth movement altered the videos, I stated the truth movement and those who believe watch and post altered videos. Do a quick Google search for any 9/11 truth movement videos and see what you get. I you want to get all legal with me and tell me what you need as a defense, please make your opening argument a little better than this. Let me clarify further....
1. Those who believe the published truth about 9/11 are grouped into those who believe the official story.
2. Those who do not believe and offer conspiracy to the WTC collapse are Truthers or those seeking the truth.
This is guilt by association and there can only be 2 sides. Sorry.
Hundreds of witnesses perceived they heard or saw explosives that day. Some described the noises as an explosions. I have read the accounts. I have read the stories. I have watched those videos hoping to hear something that maybe could make me believe....nothing.
Also, if there is no physical evidence and you are convicted of murder, you had a PD or a crummy lawyer. Money talks and public Defenders land you in jail....
As far as those who give us the official story and those who torch paint chips as evidence of nano thermite, lets compare just a few experts from the Truth movement and a few people from NIST and the 9/11 Commision.
David Ray Griffin - theologist vs John Hall - 2005 Nobel prize winner for Physics
Steven Jones - out of work professor vs Prof Hansch 2005 Nobel prize winner in Physics
James Fetzer - philosopher vs. Jun Ye - his team just created a new form of matter with ultra cold materials.
Hmmm....this looks like the Yankees vs the Devil Rays circa 2003...Still wanna call BS?