It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Saurus
False - the difference is that in Freemasonry, you give the oath line by line, and you're free to stop at any time if there is a single point you don't agree with.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
You will forfeit your very life if you break this obligation.
False. The ritual specifically implies that the inclusion of any penalty is unnecessary, because the obligation is binding on your conscience.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
And that is fair enough, because that is what you agree to.
No mason agrees to any such thing.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Blindfolded, with a hangman's noose around your neck, and a dagger held at your heart you swear an oath under duress you have no knowledge of beforehand, that you cannot later revoke.
Absolutely false.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Sounds like fun, huh?
I enjoyed my initiation tremendously, and felt a great pride in the oath I took.
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
I would like some of you Craft Brethren to deny this is true.
See my comments above for clarification on what is true and what isn't.
Originally posted by parisinflames
It just bothers me to see something I hold dear in my life, be battered by some who probably walks around wearing a cloak, and speaking in olde english counting down the days until Renaissance festival comes back.
Originally posted by parisinflames
But land of the free...free to be an embarrassment..and free to dream up your little fantasy worlds while you make my whopper.
Originally posted by KSigMason
I found this link (a .exe file) that shows a small tour of the building.
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by Silver Shadow
The Freemasons are not a secret society. Our oaths pose no danger to anyone's life, whether they break their oath or not. Plus the Freemasons are not the only group that makes you take an oath. I don't know if I've said it before, but I'll say it now; the oath of a Freemason appertains only to Freemasonry, nothing else.
If you go to a Lodge and ask for the a written copy you will not get it. It would be a violation of the oath and only Brothers know the oaths. Plus we don't just leave written copies lying around.
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by Silver Shadow
Joining the Freemasons is strictly voluntary. If you don't want to take an oath, you don't join. Technically, you are told how much it will cost after you become a Brother; it's called dues and in my Lodge it's $100 a year. As I said before, but you hadn't seen it yet, that there is no threat to your life from taking these oaths. You have read wrong on exactly how the rituals go and have taken it out of context. You are not held under duress. if you don't want to do it we don't force you - you must ask to join, we don't recruit.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Masons do not take blood oaths. I'd punch somebody if they tried to take my blood. Again, no oath supercedes any other oath someone has taken, including their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.
Originally posted by KSigMason
The Freemasons have many charities (public and anonymous). Examples: Shriner's Hospital, Knight's Templar Eye Foundation, Scottish Rite Schizophrenia Research, the Masonic Child Identification Program, and every local Lodge usually has something unique to them. My Lodge gives out scholarships to highschool students going to college.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Are you saying there is a war between you [conspiracy theorists] and the Freemasons?
Originally posted by Saurus
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Blindfolded, with a hangman's noose around your neck, and a dagger held at your heart you swear an oath under duress you have no knowledge of beforehand, that you cannot later revoke.
I just realized how absurd this statement is...
Even if there was a dagger held at your heart when you give the oath (which there isn't), how could you possibly know if you're blindfolded?
[edit on 4/6/2009 by Saurus]
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
You know that it's held to your heart because you can feel it, duh.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
While this may happen in other jurisdictions it certainly does not happen in New Jersey.
Originally posted by senrak
AM, you're feeding the . . .
. . . . well, you know.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
I may add that I do not think that the dagger prop is used anywhere in the United States but I do not have a copy of each jurisdictions ritual book so I can not say for certain. Perhaps you have some further insight.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Satanists are not above using deception to fulfill their goals.
Neither, apparently, are Christians.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Buddhism and Freemasonry are quite incompatible. Buddhists don't agree with most, if not all, of the tenets of Freemasonry.
Incorrect. For example, Spencer Compton, who served several years as Provincial Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, is a Buddhist. There is also one Buddhist that I'm aware of in my own Lodge.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Here is a link to website created by a Buddhist Mason:
Link
Originally posted by Masonic Light
It is also interesting to note that in "Morals and Dogma", Pike called the Buddha "the first Masonic legislator".
Originally posted by Masonic Light
You are correct that a Buddhist would need to be extremely unorthodox in his practices to be able to practice Masonry as well.
Not at all. There is not a slimmer of incompatibility between Buddhism and Masonry. Another point of interest: Aleister Crowley was himself a practicing Buddhist when he became a Mason.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Bitterness towards people who lie.
I have met a number of Freemasons. They have treated me kindly, but that's not to say that I would trust them,
or that I'd like to meet them again.
I'll have to admit...that's a first. I've never heard anyone say anything that even comes close to this. Most women I know aren't the least bit interested in Freemasonry, let alone "zombified" (what ever that means) by it. Oh well, I guess I associate with a different class of women.
I've also met plenty of women who seemed to be zombified under the influence of Masonry, and they were frustratingly annoying to deal with.
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Bitterness towards people who lie.
So the ATS members are lying to you? Otherwise why the obvious anger?
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by vcwxvwligenI have met a number of Freemasons. They have treated me kindly, but that's not to say that I would trust them,
I don't blame you. I sure wouldn't want to trust people who've been nice to me.
or that I'd like to meet them again.
I fully agree. I'd rather meet the people who are nasty to me.
Originally posted by senrak
I'll have to admit...that's a first. I've never heard anyone say anything that even comes close to this. Most women I know aren't the least bit interested in Freemasonry, let alone "zombified" (what ever that means) by it. Oh well, I guess I associate with a different class of women.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligenI've also met plenty of women who seemed to be zombified under the influence of Masonry, and they were frustratingly annoying to deal with.
Ta ta vcwxvwligen, it's been very....strange
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
reply to post by KSigMason
It's obvious that you're the one who doesn't know the secret
So you have a gripe about Christianity?