It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by mostlyspoons
I understand that you are worried about the HUMANE aspects of this. I am too. That is why I propose that we use a process of giving them a shot to knock them out and then humanely dispose of them through lethal injection, poison gas, or maybe if the family is poorer we could just cremate the person once they are knocked out and help save on the cost of burial. That is all humane or they wouldnt do it to animals at the vet.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Well kick me, beat me and call me dirty names. I typed Eugenics Society into Google just for kicks and giggles and guess what!
Eugenics Society
A eugenics society was a society formed to promote the idea of eugenics. In particular, the two best-known were the British Eugenics Society and the American Eugenics Society, though smaller ones were also at universities such as the Cambridge Eugenics Society. Many prominent people were members of these societies, though with the discrediting of the idea of eugenics, most of them disbanded or at least shrunk in size.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Stormdancer777
No I am not kidding. I am just showing you that we already do it to other animals so why not we humans. After all they call it humane disposal at the veteranarian, so it must be humane. Its more humane than taking a bat to the dogs head to put it out of its misery. Wouldnt you agree?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I am having a hard time taking you serious.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I am having a hard time taking you serious.
Well I am sorry. I am just trying to explain my concept. Maybe you know a more humane way to terminate people. I am open to suggestion.
We could just use that money we are spending to feed them to pay them or their families to terminate one another. Then each year its less money, because its less people to feed.
I mean we all know it must be better to be dead than be hungry with flies landing on you all day. I bet if we gave them the means they would run to the doctor to be terminated.
Maybe we could do it like Operation Smile where they take that jet around the world and operate on kids. Maybe there could be a jet with a crematorium on it and they could line up to have a chance to be next. Then when the Operation Hope (i am just making up a name, but that seems like a good one) doctors were done they could spread the ashes as the plane ascended out of there.
You said :
Why cant a person change and have a new view on these matters? I listened to the other side and realized the error of my ways.
We could just use that money we are spending to feed them to pay them or their families to terminate one another.
We could just use that money we are spending to feed them to pay them or their families to terminate one another.
You said :
Then you think this is a good idea?
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I understand if you disagree. I used to be pro-life once too. However, you dont need to mock my ideas. That isnt constructive for anyone. Sorry for complaining though, because I have been foolish in the past and mocked other people, so I am really no better.
We could just use that money we are spending to feed them to pay them or their families to terminate one another.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Ben Niceknowinya
See we are a lot a like. We are both pro-choice. Maybe I want to allow a little more choice than you do, but is that wrong.
My best friend and his wife have an autistic child and he is a real burden to the family. He wont behave and all he will eat is Cheetos and Pepsi. It has to be Cheetos and Pepsi or he will flip. Like if you try to slip him a coke he will loose his mind. It is such a strain on my friends. I have shared this idea with my friend and he says if it became legal he would put the boy out of his misery.
Why should my friend and his wife be burdened with this for the rest of their lives. It is no different than forcing a woman to have a child she doesnt want. Neither one is fair.
[edit on 5/20/2009 by justsomeboreddude]