41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11

Originally posted by FlySolo

Perhaps i should start a new thread on this but I must say this first. At 1 hr and 16 min in the clip, the most irrefutable evidence that the trade centers were brought down by a controlled demolition is shown with the second tower. Everyone has seen the clips. The top 1/4 floors or so come down and TILT off center. Yet, below, the building continues to fall symmetrically straight down. This is impossible. This completely contradicts everything.

Someone explain to me how this is possible?

Ok, I will..

Would it be safe to assume that each of us watching the towers burn, or the strikes to the towers by the airplanes, or the collapses themselves.. were EXTREMELY emotionally provoked by watching this?

Emotionally laden words, images, attacks, whatever... invoke a trance state, a state of hypnoid hypnosis...

In a trance state everything you are being told enters your subconscious, bypassing the filters of the self..

In a trance state everything you are being told is TRUE.

This is how mind control "works", this is how the "explanations" we were listening to - "see the planes hit the towers, see the towers burn, see the towers fall because the planes hit the towers...." were embedded into our minds, with intent... to deceive us and obfuscate the truth..

In a trance state one no longer THINKS, one only regurgitates what one has been told to be true.

In fact, in a trance state everything you are told is true - for you.

We were being told, as we sat mesmerized by the images exactly what they wanted us to conclude was happening as it happened.

---------------------------------------

Add some collective persuasive group agreement a'la Le Cron , Le Bon or Behkterev and voila, you have what we call American Capitalism, where worth is determined only by MONEY and POWER.

The framers of this nation intended for a government

"of the people, by the people and for the people"

NOT

"of the money, by the money, and for the money"

--------------------------------

For more information on the Psychological Warfare Manipulation Techniques being used (on ATS too) to make you think and conclude what the operators want you to think. See the following links:

George Estabrook's 1943 book Hypnosis

Delusion and Mass Delusion by Joost Meerloo PhD

Harry Aron's 1952 Article "Instantaneous Hypnosis"

If those who are seeking the truth were to study the material at the links above, you will be armed with the knowledge to defend yourself from the slings and arrows on the real battleline of WWIII; The the battle for control of your mind.

---------------------------

Sidebar: The word Apocalypse has a different meaning than is commonly believed... Apocalypse means "The time when truth is revealed"

We are surfers upon the winds of fate at the event horizon of the apocalypse.

And, Surf's up!

[edit on 30-5-2009 by seataka]

[edit on 30-5-2009 by seataka]

[edit on 30-5-2009 by seataka]

[edit on 30-5-2009 by seataka]

[edit on 30-5-2009 by seataka]

The list of professional experts who challenge the official account of 9/11 is ever growing, as more and more people are having the courage to come out with their thoughts, even putting their careers at risk.

Check this out. The links to the full reports can be found at the link below.

patriotsquestion911.com...

200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
690+ Engineers and Architects
200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
400+ Professors Question 9/11
230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals

CREDIBLE CRITICS OF THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11

41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11: "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions," "a Joke," "a Cover-up"
May 18, 2009 English PDF English HTML Danish PDF
French PDF German PDF Greek PDF Norwegian PDF
Polish PDF Swedish PDF

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11 – More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports
June 17, 2009 PDF

Respected Medical Professionals Launch New 9/11 Truth Group – Announces Online Petition Calling for New Investigation
Feb. 24, 2009 MS Word Article on OpEdNews

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 “Impossible”, “A Bunch of Hogwash”, “Total B.S.”, “Ludicrous”, “A Well-Organized Cover-up”, “A White-Washed Farce”
Jan. 14, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 – Official Account of 9/11 "Flawed", "Absurd", "Totally Inadequate", "a Cover-up"
Jan. 5, 2008 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation – Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
Dec. 13, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews

Eight Senior Republican Administration Appointees Challenge Official Account of 9/11 – "Not Possible", "a Whitewash", "False"
Dec. 4, 2007 PDF Version Article on OpEdNews


Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement,
and Government Officials Question
the 9/11 Commission Report

Many well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report or have made public statements that contradict the Report. Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. This page of the website is a collection of their statements. The website does not represent any organization and it should be made clear that none of these individuals are affiliated with this website.

Listed below are statements by more than 200 of these senior officials. Their collective voices give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed. These individuals cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by their decades of service to their country, demonstrate that criticism of the Report is not irresponsible, illogical, nor disloyal, per se. In fact, it can be just the opposite. (continued below)

See the rest of the page at patriotsquestion911.com...