It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Ultimately Israel is going to lay in ruins and the Jews living there sacrificed to a grander plan that just but a handful will profit from and live through for the sake of their own power and glory.
Ultimately that's not in the average Jew's or Israeli's interest.
Sadly they will have nothing but their own distorted egos to blame once more.
You see Mike when people conspire to lie about and cover up history and twist it into something it wasn't, everyone ends up suffering for it, including the fools who rewrote who along the way forget those who have not learned the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them.
Frankly I am not that stupid...why is Israel?
With regards to accusing Israel of not showing enough restraint towards the state-instituted terrorist campaign emanating from Gaza (referring to protoplastictraveler's cute hand biting analogy), do you not think that ignoring 8 years' worth of rocket attacks shows remarkable restraint?
I cannot think of any other nation on Earth that would be expected by the international community to sit and do nothing while people at its border fire tens of thousands of rockets and missiles at civilian homes. I harbour no malice whatsoever towards Palestinian Arabs and I feel very sorry for civilians that are caught in the middle of Hamas's campaign of hate against Israel, but no responsible government can be expected to, or would, just ignore those attacks on its own population. Not one.
You attempt to characterize Hamas terrorists as poor, misled and misguided. Do you honestly, seriously believe that those people just want their land back? Even in spite of the relentless state-run propaganda which encourages children to kill Jews? Have you not seen the Heil-Hitler salutes? Have you not seen the Hamas bunny? Are you not aware that Israel withdrew every settlement and every Jewish settler from Gaza, along with the IDF soldiers that protected them, at a cost of billions, 4 years ago? So kindly explain to me what Hamas are fighting against?
Terrorism in Gaza is institutional. It is encouraged and glorified from primary school upwards and it is funded and sponsored by much larger, richer nations that have consistently sought the destruction of the Jewish state for the last 60 years.
And I categorize terrorism as the intentional, calculated attempt to kill non-combatants in order to instil terror. Your attempt to turn this around by citing the actions of Irgun (who were an insurgency movement that primarily attacked military institutions - King David Hotel was a base for the British army), over 50 years ago, fail.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Oh that British Army that was lawfully in charge of the territory it commited to conquering and governing to create legal Zionist immigration to 48% of the land, after obligating themselves to do that in the Balfour Decleration, which they just happened to issue to the world's richest man, and founding Zionist Lord Rothschild who just also happened to control the Bank of England at a time when tactically, and economically England had all but lost the trench warfare battle in Europe against the Kaiser, and the French were in mutiny and the English bankrupt and out of bullets?
That British Army? Oh alright then.
So the Zionists employ the British as a murdering band of land robbers to oust the Ottoman Turks from the region, and then the Zionists kill the British and drive them off.
Unclear is how, with unlimited wealth, power, and influence, in all this time the best these world controlling Jews could manage is a resource barren tenaciously held strip of land in the most hostile location possible.
Lehi had three main goals:
to bring together all those interested in liberation (that is, those willing to join in active fighting against the British)
to appear before the world as the only active Jewish military organization
to take over the Land of Israel by armed force[9]
The group believed in its early years that its goals would be achieved by finding a strong international ally that would expel the British from Palestine, or Eretz Yisrael (the Jewish name for the land), in return for help from the Jewish military; this would in turn require the creation of a broad and organised military force "demonstrating its desire for freedom through military operations."[10]
An article titled "Terror" in He Khazit (The Front, a Lehi underground newspaper) argued as follows:
Neither Jewish ethics nor Jewish tradition can disqualify terrorism as a means of combat. We are very far from having any moral qualms as far as our national war goes. We have before us the command of the Torah, whose morality surpasses that of any other body of laws in the world: "Ye shall blot them out to the last man." But first and foremost, terrorism is for us a part of the political battle being conducted under the present circumstances, and it has a great part to play: speaking in a clear voice to the whole world, as well as to our wretched brethren outside this land, it proclaims our war against the occupier. We are particularly far from this sort of hesitation in regard to an enemy whose moral perversion is admitted by all. [11]
The article described the goals of terror:
It demonstrates ... against the true terrorist who hides behind his piles of papers and the laws he has legislated.
It is not directed against people, it is directed against representatives. Therefore it is effective.
If it also shakes the Yishuv from their complacency, good and well.[11]
:
Avraham Stern put forth the ideology of his organization in what was called the 18 Principles of Rebirth:[13]
1 - The nation: The Jewish people is a covenanted people, the originator of monotheism, formulator of the prophetic teachings, standard bearer of human culture, guardian of glorious patrimony. The Jewish people is schooled in self-sacrifice and suffering; its vision, survivability and faith in redemption are indestructible.
2 - The homeland: The homeland in the Land of Israel within the borders delineated in the Bible ("To your descendants, I shall give this land, from the River of Egypt to the great Euphrates River." Genesis 15:18) This is the land of the living, where the entire nation shall live in safety.
3 - The nation and its land: Israel conquered the land with the sword. There it became a great nation and only there it will be reborn. Hence Israel alone has a right to that land. This is an absolute right. It has never expired and never will.
4 - The Goals
1 - Redemption of the land.
2 - Establishment of sovereignty.
3 - Revival of the nation.
There is no sovereignty without the redemption of the land, and there is no national revival without sovereignty.
These are the goals of the organization during the period of war and conquest:
5 - Education: Educate the nation to love freedom and zealously guard Israel's eternal patrimony. Inculcate the idea that the nation is master to its own fate. Revive the doctrine that "The sword and the book came bound together from heaven" (Midrash Vayikra Rabba 35:8)
6 - Unity: The unification of the entire nation around the banner of the Hebrew freedom movement. The use of the genius, status and resources of individuals and the channeling of the energy, devotion and revolutionary fervour of the masses for the war of liberation.
7 - Pacts: Make pacts with all those who are willing to help the struggle of the organization and provide direct support.
8 - Force: Consolidate and increase the fighting force in the homeland and in the Diaspora, in the underground and in the barracks, to become the Hebrew army of liberation with its flag, arms, and commanders.
9 - War: Constant war against those who stand in the way of fulfilling the goals.
10 - Conquest: The conquest of the homeland from foreign rule and its eternal possession.
These are the tasks of the movement during the period of sovereignty and redemption:
11 - Sovereignty: Renewal of Hebrew sovereignty over the redeemed land.
12 - Rule of justice: The establishment of a social order in the spirit of Jewish morality and prophetic justice. Under such an order no one will go hungry or unemployed. All will live in harmony, mutual respect and friendship as an example to the world.
13 - Reviving the wilderness: Build the ruins and revive the wilderness for mass immigration and population increase.
14 - Aliens: Solve the problem of alien population [i.e. the Arab inhabitants of Palestine] by exchange of population.
15 - Ingathering of the exiles: Total in-gathering of the exiles to their sovereign state.
16 - Power: The Hebrew nation shall become a first-rate military, political, cultural and economical entity in the Middle East and around the Mediterranean Sea.
17 - Revival: The revival of the Hebrew language as a spoken language by the entire nation, the renewal of the historical and spiritual might of Israel. The purification of the national character in the fire of revival.
18 - The temple: The building of the Third Temple as a symbol of the new era of total redemption.
13]
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
This is tough love Mike, I am not trying to condemn the Jews of the world, I am trying to save them from themselves...
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
This is tough love Mike, I am not trying to condemn the Jews of the world, I am trying to save them from themselves...
The Jews of the world have much to be thankful having you on their side.
I enjoy your Good Cop / Bad Cop routine, alternating warm personalization with savage condemnation. An effective strategy in breaking down resistance in business dealings and seduction.
Myself I have a multi-disciplined background and have lived and worked in many parts of the world.
My late wife came from an old 'insider' Catholic family, with a Jesuit priest for an uncle and an Ursuline nun an aunt. I mention this only because there are equally fascinating claims of the Catholic Church being responsible for the political and economic chicanery and turmoil in the last century. I find these claims to behighly exaggerated.
When you narrow focus on a single cause, say Zionism or the Vatican, dot connecting can yield highly compelling results. Discovering hidden world controllers and malign campaigns is always a fascinating game.
But on closer examination the world is an amazingly complicated place with power, wealth, and influence in constant flux. The simple answers are appealing but also deceptive.
Anyway, I find your always informative messages entertaining, sometimes even insightful.
Mike
[edit on 27-5-2009 by mmiichael]
Amnesty catalogues Israel’s human rights abuses
London, May 28, IRNA – Amnesty International has catalogued a host of gross human rights violations and breaches of international law in its latest annual report on 157 countries and territories worldwide.
In its the latest massacre of Palestinians in Gaza, the London-based human rights organisation also said that the Israeli forces repeatedly breached the laws of war, including by carrying out direct attacks on civilians and civilian buildings.”
Israel’s military offensive, it said, was on “an unprecedented scale,” killing over 1,400 Palestinians, including some 300 children, and wounding some 5,000 others.
“From Gaza to Darfur and from eastern DRC to northern Sri Lanka, the human toll of conflict has been horrendous, and the lukewarm response of the international community shocking,” said Amnesty’s Secretary General Irene Khan, in summing up last year events.
The report for 2008 said that Israel was already “stoking up a growing humanitarian catastrophe” in its siege of Gaza even before it launch its slaughter at the end of the year.
“The blockade throttled almost all economic life and led growing numbers of Palestinians to become dependent on international food aid; even terminally ill patients were prevented from leaving to obtain medical care that could not be provided by Gaza’s resource- and medicine-starved hospitals,” it said.
“Palestinians already living in poverty were made homeless as a matter of deliberate policy” and this also included the West Bank, where Israeli forces demolished many Palestinian homes, the human rights group said.
“In the Jordan Valley, they brought in bulldozers to flatten villagers’ homes and animal pens, depriving them of their livelihood, while elsewhere Palestinians were cut off from their agricultural lands by the construction of the fence/wall and were prevented from travelling to work, study or even to obtain hospital treatment by numerous Israeli army checkpoints and road-blocks.”
In Gaza during the bombardment, some 20,000 Palestinian homes were further destroyed or badly damaged as well as schools and workplaces and this was to an entire population of 1.5 million that were “virtually imprisoned” by Israel.
With regard to Israel’s war crimes, Amnesty also castigated the UN for showing “itself unwilling to establish a comprehensive international investigation of its own or to require that Israel cooperate with the inquiry established by the UN Human Rights Council.”
The catalogue of Israeli killings was not only confined to Gaza but also included was listed as 425 Palestinians, included some 70 children in the first half of 2008.
Breaches of international law extended to Israel’s continuing expansion and development of illegal settlements in the West Bank, where the movement of Palestinians were also severely curtailed by some 600 checkpoints and barriers, and by the 700km illegal barrier.
“The expansion of illegal Israeli settlements on seized Palestinian land increased to a level not seen since 2001,” the report said.
It also criticised the increased violence by soldiers and illegal settlers, who committed serious abuses against Palestinians, including unlawful killings, assaults and attacks against property, saying they “enjoyed impunity in most cases.”
On the other side were the hundreds of Palestinians were arrested and frequently reportedly tortured and ill-treated, but Amnesty said that any investigations by Israeli authorities were “rare.” It calculated some 8,000 Palestinians remained in Israeli prisons, many after unfair military trials.
In Lebanon, it reported that Israel was still in breach of UN demands to provide data to assist clearance of unexploded munitions from cluster bombs during its 2006 invasion and that by the end of 2008, it was still illegally occupying the border village of Ghajar.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
You just can't even equate on any level the disparity between the loss of one side versus the loss on the other side of being even in the same category of barbarity, viciousness, and insane inhumanity.
The numbers are all out of wack. The accounting department has flagged this.
Looks like what they say that the road to redemption is full of nothing but ruin.
www.commentarymagazine.com...
It is indeed the tragedy of the Palestinians that the two leaders who determined their national development during the 20th century—Hajj Amin Husseini and Yasir Arafat, the latter of whom dominated Palestinian politics since the mid-1960’s to his death in November 2004—were megalomaniacal extremists blinded by anti-Jewish hatred and profoundly obsessed with violence. Had the mufti chosen to lead his people to peace and reconciliation with their Jewish neighbors, as he had promised the British officials who appointed him to his high rank in the early 1920’s, the Palestinians would have had their independent state over a substantial part of Mandate Palestine by 1948, and would have been spared the traumatic experience of dispersion and exile. Had Arafat set the PLO from the start on the path to peace and reconciliation, instead of turning it into one of the most murderous terrorist organizations in modern times, a Palestinian state could have been established in the late 1960’s or the early 1970’s; in 1979 as a corollary to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty; by May 1999 as part of the Oslo process; or at the very latest with the Camp David summit of July 2000.
Instead, Arafat transformed the territories placed under his control in the 1990’s into an effective terror state from where he launched an all-out war (the “al-Aqsa intifada”) shortly after being offered an independent Palestinian state in the Gaza Strip and 92 percent of the West Bank, with East Jerusalem as its capital. In the process, he subjected the Palestinian population in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip to a repressive and corrupt regime in the worst tradition of Arab dictatorships and plunged their standard of living to unprecedented depths.
What makes this state of affairs all the more galling is that, far from being unfortunate aberrations, Hajj Amin and Arafat were quintessential representatives of the cynical and self-seeking leaders produced by the Arab political system. Just as the Palestinian leadership during the Mandate had no qualms about inciting its constituents against Zionism and the Jews, while lining its own pockets from the fruits of Jewish entrepreneurship, so PLO officials used the billions of dollars donated by the Arab oil states and, during the Oslo era, by the international community to finance their luxurious style of life while ordinary Palestinians scrambled for a livelihood.
And so it goes. Six decades after the mufti and his henchmen condemned their people to statelessness by rejecting the UN partition resolution, their reckless decisions are being reenacted by the latest generation of Palestinian leaders. This applies not only to Hamas, which in January 2006 replaced the PLO at the helm of the Palestinian Authority (PA), but also to the supposedly moderate Palestinian leadership—from President Mahmoud Abbas to Ahmad Qureia (negotiator of the 1993 Oslo Accords) to Saeb Erekat to prime minister Salam Fayad—which refuses to recognize Israel’s very existence as a Jewish state and insists on the full implementation of the “right of return.”
And so it goes as well with Western anti-Zionists who in the name of justice (no less) call today not for a new and fundamentally different Arab leadership but for the dismantlement of the Jewish state. Only when these dispositions change can Palestinian Arabs realistically look forward to putting their self-inflicted “catastrophe” behind them.
Had Arafat set the PLO from the start on the path to peace and reconciliation, instead of turning it into one of the most murderous terrorist organizations in modern times, a Palestinian state could have been established in the late 1960’s or the early 1970’s; in 1979 as a corollary to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty; by May 1999 as part of the Oslo process; or at the very latest with the Camp David summit of July 2000
And so it goes. Six decades after the mufti and his henchmen condemned their people to statelessness by rejecting the UN partition resolution, their reckless decisions are being reenacted by the latest generation of Palestinian leaders.
They have entered a phase where achieving peace is no longer the real goal. They are funded and armed to be in a perpetual state of war with Israel, and casualties on their side translate to increased outside funding to continue this madness.
A number of new high-school textbooks, introduced last year into the Israeli curriculum, repudiate many well-documented and long-established facts about the 1948 war in favor of standard Arab/Palestinian claims, including the charge that substantial numbers of Palestinians were expelled during the war and that Israel bears sole responsibility for their ongoing status as refugees. "Only ten years ago, much of this was taboo," the Israeli author of one of the new ninth-grade textbooks boasted to the New York Times.
www.netanyahu.org...
In the first place it was not Arafat who blew up Camp David. Robert Malley, Clinton's adviser at the conference, and others have long since exhaustively debunked this for the almost ludicrously partisan myth it was. In their view, Barak himself contributed more to the collapse than Arafat.
And now comes Malka, the former intelligence chief, who flatly asserts that the evaluations of Arafat's intentions and actions on which Barak, and later Sharon, relied were "erroneous", and deliberately so. They were the handiwork of one man, who occupied a key position in the Israeli policy-making process: Amos Gilad, the head of the military intelligence research department. He presented "national security assessments" to the government. Crucially, he only did so orally, because, as he put it, "they [ministers] don't read".
But even more crucially, according to Malka, his oral reports were at variance with the written ones of his bureau, an inconsistency he made good by "retroactively rewriting them". For these written reports just couldn't support what, via his misrepresentations, became the orthodox, highly negative view of Arafat.
www.fromoccupiedpalestine.org...
Originally posted by A Conscience
I can't see how you can go on perpetuating this myth and even appear to believe in it. As they say, repeat the same lie long enough and you end up swallowing your own spew.
You don't and you won't ever bother to learn the actual history of the conflict, relying on whatever literature support your warped beliefs.
Throughout history when people have declared wars and lost they learn to come to terms with the unfortunate results of their action. They make peace and move on with their lives. The Palestinians and their supporting Arab countries are notable in that they not only don't know how to win a war they don't even know how to lose one.
On the contrary, most literature are totally biased towards Israel side. Thanks to the western media and powerful Israel lobby. Whenever there is any criticism towards Israel, the Zionist lobby will soon see to it that it is duly dealt with, often with such savagery that is alien to the so called democratic world.
Ask yourself, why was the conflict in Gaza earlier this year so much in the public conscience? Why did it merit front page coverage and headline television news for three weeks?
Less than 1500 people died (the majority of whom were Hamas operatives).
It was a small, localized military operation and its aims were defensive. And yet it merited front page status for three weeks.
Where was the coverage of the hundreds of trucks of aid that Israel was sending over the border every day?
Despite Gaza’s urgent needs and Hamas’s attempts to control aid, Israel’s broad restrictions on the delivery of food, fuel, and other goods appear without justification by any legitimate security concern. Since January 18, for example, Israel has blocked shipments of chickpeas, dates, tea bags, children’s puzzles, and macaroni.
Israel also rejected a water purification system donated by the government of France. According to Gaza’s water utility, as of February 16, 50,000 residents had no access to piped water, and an additional 100,000 receive water every seven to 10 days. Shipments of spare parts are needed before major repairs can be made, the utility said.
De-mining teams have been unable to destroy or isolate some unexploded Israeli weapons because Israel has denied entry for needed materials and equipment, OCHA reported on February 16.
According to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), 60 percent of the 200,000 schoolchildren attending its Gaza schools are without a full complement of textbooks because Israel has blocked shipments of paper needed to print the books. The UN agency said that Israel also blocked the material needed to make plastic bags for food distribution.
Israel also continues to restrict supplies of industrial diesel fuel used to generate electricity, keeping Gaza’s only power plant operating at two-thirds capacity and exacerbating Gaza’s already severe electricity shortage. Israel blocked all petrol, diesel, and cooking gas into Gaza between February 8 and 14, OCHA said. Electricity cuts contribute to widespread water access problems.
www.hrw.org...
Defense of the State, its Citizens and its Residents - "The IDF's goal is to defend the existence of the State of Israel, its independence and the security of the citizens and residents of the state."
Love of the Homeland and Loyalty to the Country - "At the core of service in the IDF stand the love of the homeland and the commitment and devotion to the State of Israel-a democratic state that serves as a national home for the Jewish People-its citizens and residents."
Human Dignity - "The IDF and its soldiers are obligated to protect human dignity. Every human being is of value regardless of his or her origin, religion, nationality, gender, status or position."