Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution

Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers
"Most people want proove of the human and ape missing link because there is a missing link. And because humans and apes walk the planet to this day where is the in between?? Its a flaw in darwins theory of our evolution."

Well I can help give you some clues to that as well. Here is a page from a website that shows MANY different transitional fossil skulls between apes and man. I do not know if this is what you are looking for just trying to help.

www.talkorigins.org...

That website talkorigins is really cool.

Here is a link to the Frequently Asked Questions that is awesome and helped me a great deal. I hope it helps you find some answers to questions you might have.

www.talkorigins.org...

aaah yes the old chimpanzee, skulls and many "doctored" skulls of Australopithecus aficanus or "Lucy in desguise with diamonds" '___' hallucination that another pathetic pile of piltdown propaganda passed off as fact back when it was first discovered and artisans would create entire skulls from a tooth or bodies from a monkey skull. Kids still believe this stuff years and years after it has been debunked because Darwinists NEVER get around to removing the JUNK they believe is science. In Fact Most of us can walk into the halls of modern public school system biology class and find ernst haekles tweaked fraudulent embryo drawiings in the text books and then we have their spin on DNA that I remember lurking on this wensite years ago when all the darwinists were sweeping DNA's digital code under the rug calling it nothing important just a simple molecule is all move along nothing to see here. Or when they were always giving excuses for how hard it is for a fossil to become a fossil and why there were so few transitional fossils. Then one day someone in the darwinist community came up with the idea that ALL fossils are transitional when the fossil record shows stasis. I have heard the mechanism for sexual selection then, later it was "punctuated equilibrium" then it was random mutation and natural selection or what we have always known as adaptation with variation. I remember when creationists used to explain how the domestic dog proved that evolution doesn't take millions of years and evo's would ridicule them as only breeds of dogs and not evolution.

Then I watched them steal that same example for dogs to justify an explanation for punctuated equilibrium calling all the varietys of dog, "species" when it was ridiculed for calling it that by creationists.

Obfusating the vernacular of this particular area of science is what darwinists do and the evolution industry is in the midst of yet another re-vamp of the entire evolution story and this time stealing from the ID people the same concepts and ideas they ridiculed as NOT science back when they with the help of the ACLU and PBS bastardized the dover VS kitzmiller trial on television.

The science of Darwinian evolution is on its deathbed and has kept medicince in the stoneage having become exactly what they accused creationsist of attempting to do to science. They have in fact become the antithesis of science and turned it into a religion . To even question it is blaspheme and they defend it with all the pomp and zeal of a hell fire and brimstone baptist preacher looking as ridiculous as the landover baptist.

No wonder our science scores have dropped so far back. It is because we are still looking for silly missing links to satisfy the idiotic need to say to creationists, "see I told you we came from apes" as if they actually WANT to be primates so much, everything they discover is an addition to that proverbial mountain of BS they call " evidence"

We will never have real trasitional fossils only species that randomly appear. There has been evidence of modern man that dates back before lemur girl here but it is usually thrown out because it pisses evolutionists AND christians off. Evolution has yet to provide any 1/2 way points between species, as there should be many found through changes over time.
One of the problems is there are different schools of though as far as evolution goes. And they are exchanged to explain away what ever they want.
there are no trasitional fossils- evolutionist will tell you that it happened by random mutations (magically changed for no reason)

evolution is not real- evolutionist will switch gears here and parrot off somthing like "evolution happens over time and can be observed with the -insert animal here- and they changed within -insert time period here- and thats why they are _______ now. (note how it contradicts the no trasitional fossils explanation and how observable "slow overtime evolution" has not produced new species"

The theory of evolution is the only thing i have observed slowly changing over time.The man from ape theory keeps falling on its face so the theory has to keep changing.


see how this "evolution of man" does not go in a straight line, its kind of all over the place. And if you were to add the apes that were around that whole time while that evolution was taking place and add the apes that are still around today it would make even less sence.

reply to post by Con Science


What do you believe Con Science? Not Creationism? Not Evolution? Is there another theory that anyone has proposed? What is your take on the fossil record and how creatures came to be the way they are today?

reply to post by The Mack


I would also like to know what you believe The Mack. What has your research into all of this given you in the way of a theory of what is going on and how we got here? I have never heard another theory besides creationism and evolution. What theory do you believe?

reply to post by Con Science


Wow, couldn't agree more. Especially what you wrote about going into modern schools and taking a look over the science books they likely have. Heck when I was in school only 15 years ago they were still teaching us about the silly lightning in a bottle experiment meant to reproduce the primordial ooze/lightning hypothesis of how life began - and that has been debunked since shortly after it was publicized. If anything, it showed that intelligence was needed to create a closed system with the correct variables for "life" to emerge!!

Star for you.

reply to post by TurkeyBurgers


Well i will not go to far into it becuase it would require its own thread. But i can give you the basics. you have a life force (whatever you want to call it) and that is capable of changing the organisim as well as animating it. For there to be change in an organisim over time with the introduction of something new in the environment the education part of death would have to survive death. Basic survival instincts come from the life force not DNA. Now it would be my theory that this life force is somewhat collective to some degree to keep things working properly. With the theory of evolution nothing should ever stop evolving it should keep going prey should be constantly adapting to keep away from its predators and predators should be getting faster to keep up with its prey. Things like the opossom have reached their perfected form as they have not evolved in about 80 million years which is why they are called living fossils.
I think humans fall into a different category as we are much smarter than the animals but our newborns are dumber than newborn kittens.

as a side note the evolutionist response of why something evolved a certian way always sounds like intellegent designer.

[edit on 20-5-2009 by The Mack]

This is an abomination untu the lord!

I like it!