It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sonya610
reply to post by usamaizm
Realize in all likelihood the actual RAPISTS are in fact Iraqi's. That means Muslim by birth.
Originally posted by miasria
Originally posted by Sonya610
reply to post by usamaizm
Realize in all likelihood the actual RAPISTS are in fact Iraqi's. That means Muslim by birth.
it is unlikely. there were videos and photos taken. the boy was 16 or so years old.
there was also a woman that was what appeared to be an act of rape. not sure if it was concentual. the records did not indicate.
Originally posted by zerbot565
Originally posted by miasriatorture was very common at this facility. by a few? no. they ran many intellgence agencies through.. all with their own job to do. it's unfortunate that those who were sentanced were at the bottom of the pole.
Originally posted by Sonya610....But then again those that were sentenced were taking PICTURES of themselves doing it. Perhaps the higher ups were a little less stupid than to document their crimes and film and leave it around as a "cool souvenier".
"The torture and ill treatment of prisoners which is carried out with the authority of some Government constitutes not only a crime against humanity, but also a crime against moral law"
UN Human Rights Council
"Two years ago, former Bush Administration Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld hurriedly fled France, fearing he would be arrested by French authorities for "ordering and authorizing" the torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and the U.S. facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba."
Spain considers prosecuting U.S. officials for torture
How and why a Spanish judge might put Bush administration lawyers on trial for actions at Guantanamo Bay.
The Spanish case targets the government lawyers -- including former Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales -- whose legal opinions laid the groundwork for so-called harsh interrogations. Why the lawyers?
When the administration decided to move to aggressive techniques, it seems they turned to lawyers who could be relied upon to sign on. They systematically excluded from the process those lawyers who would have given contrary advice. But for the lawyers, these abuses, this torture, would not have happened. So the administration got bad advice from lawyers; they didn't have to take it. Why does that make the lawyers guilty?
The lawyers appear to have been part of a plan to subvert the law. First the administration fixed on a policy of cruelty, then they found the lawyers to sign off on it. On my reading, the lawyers acted not in the service of providing fearless, independent legal advice, but provided support to a predetermined policy of abuse. In that way, they became complicit in a policy of torture. Is there legal precedent in going after the lawyers?
"America cannot hold itself as a moral beacon to the world if it violates the rule of law by engaging in illegal spying, torture and secrecy. The ACLU is committed to making sure that our government complies with universally recognized human rights principles and upholds our Constitution."
Jamil Dakwar
"This is the last chance for us to pave the rule of law and the constitutional process. We're saying we can't stop the people."
Alan Peter Cayetano
"There are those who argue that the concept of human rights is not applicable to all cultures. We in the National League for Democracy believe that human rights are of universal relevance. But even those who do not believe in human rights must certainly agree that the rule of law is most important. Without the rule of law there can be no peace."
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi : at UN Human Rights
“When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men and women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience, it turns against humanity and society.”
Pope John Paul II
"The clearest way to show what the rule of law means to us in everyday life is to recall what has happened when there is no rule of law.”
Dwight David Eisenhower
“Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged”
Ronald Reagan
"Wherever Law ends, Tyranny begins"
John Locke
"I think that the real problem comes with a President who does not understand the rule of law. ..."
"The rule of law must apply to politicians, to governments and to state officials as much as it does to private citizens. A government department can be taken to a court of law if it has exceeded its authority, as government officials in Britain are very well aware. A just law is the best defence not only against over-mighty individuals, but against an over-mighty State."
"But it is not just enough to pass legislation in order to have a rule of law. People have to know that it will be enforced and upheld by independent and impartial judges. That is true of the criminal law: the citizens will not respect and obey it if they lack faith in the judicial system."
"The rule of law has grown up over the centuries. In our country, it began with the idea of redressing grievances and of fairness, with the idea that noone could be held for an indefinite period before being brought publicly before a court of law."
Margaret Thatcher
I do not deserve to be hated.
Originally posted by muffingirl
reply to post by Chevalerous
I have kind of a dumb question for you-what is that thing supposed to be in your picture? It looks like a monstrous kid and a rabbit with gas masks on. Is that what it is?
NEW YORK - The U.S. government can keep pictures of detainee abuse secret while it asks the Supreme Court to permanently block release of the photographs on the grounds they could incite violence in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, a federal appeals court said Thursday.
The one-paragraph ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan came after the Obama administration asked the court to keep the pictures secret so it could appeal to the nation's highest court.
The administration last month said the disturbing photographs pose "a clear and grave risk of inciting violence and riots against American and coalition forces, as well as civilian personnel, serving in Iraq and Afghanistan."