It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whitewave
From one side of their mouths they say that it has "bioengineered" written all over it and out of the other side of their mouths they say it just accidentally mutated in eggs and escaped the lab.
It didn't "go wild" in nature...it escaped a LAB!
Originally posted by count66
This article was taken from Bloomberg where once of the scientists who was involved in the research that produced Tamiflu has submitted a report to the WHO suggesting that the so called swine flu was the result of a labratory experiment gone awry.
WHO are current investigating the report and deciding whether to take it further.
Here is a quote from the article and a link to the full article is provided below.
The World Health Organization is investigating an Australian researcher’s claim that the swine flu virus circling the globe may have been created as a result of human error. Adrian Gibbs, 75, who collaborated on research that led to the development of Roche Holding AG’s Tamiflu drug, said in an interview today that he intends to publish a report suggesting the new strain may have accidentally evolved in eggs scientists use to grow viruses and drugmakers use to make vaccines. Gibbs said that he came to his conclusion as part of an effort to trace the virus’s origins by analyzing its genetic blueprint. The World Health Organization received the study last weekend and is reviewing it, Keiji Fukuda, the agency’s assistant director-general of health security and environment, said in an interview yesterday. Gibbs, who has studied germ evolution for four decades, is one of the first scientists to analyze the genetic makeup of the virus that was identified three weeks ago in Mexico and threatens to touch off the first flu pandemic since 1968.
www.bloomberg.com...
In addition, Gibbs said his research found the rate of genetic mutation in the new virus was about three times faster than that of the most closely related viruses found in pigs, suggesting it evolved outside of swine,” states the report.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were quick to deny Gibbs’ report, saying they found no evidence to verify his conclusions.
In our reports immediately following the swine flu outbreak, we speculated that the virus may have been created in a lab due to its highly synthetic nature, being a combination of several never-before-seen intercontinental human, avian and pig viruses from America, Europe and Asia.
In 2006 it was revealed that Bayer Corporation had discovered that their injection drug, which was used by hemophiliacs, was contaminated with the HIV virus. Internal documents prove that after they positively knew that the drug was contaminated, they took it off the U.S. market only to dump it on the European, Asian and Latin American markets, knowingly exposing thousands, most of them children, to the live HIV virus. Government officials in France went to prison for allowing the drug to be distributed. The documents show that the FDA colluded with Bayer to cover-up the scandal and allowed the deadly drug to be distributed globally. No Bayer executives ever faced arrest or prosecution in the United States.
In the UK, a 2007 outbreak of foot and mouth disease that put Britain on high alert has been originated from a government laboratory which is shared with an American pharmaceutical company, mirroring the deadly outbreak of 2001, which was also deliberately released.
Originally posted by soficrow
Originally posted by whitewave
The fools thought DNA was immutable and unchangeable (it's not, it changes all the time), and that what they built was stable (it's not, it mutates, re-assorts and merges with other crap). They also assumed that nothing has an effect on anything else (it does; everything interacts with everything else, down to the atomic level).
Scientists are well aware that DNA is not immutable and unchangeable. I was just reading yesterday about beneficial mutations in which 30,000 generations of E. coli were tested for beneficial mutations from the original strain. There were several other germs (brucellis, etc.) so they certainly do know about mutations. They're inducing and guiding them in directions they want.
The DoD has admitted to 239 biological experiments on the unsuspecting American public during the cold war. I'm sure this novel flu is just another one.
Eventually they'll come up with one that surprises us all; one they can't control.
Originally posted by flightsuit
Originally posted by kix
A friend of mine who works at gene secuencing in Mexicos national University told me tha the H1N1 bug has bio engenieering. So its not a natural ocurrence.
Could you please provide more information? I would be very interested to know exactly how your friend has made this determination. I'm willing to believe it if I hear a plausible story, but quite frankly, I have a hard time believing any researcher would be able to look at any specimen and state unequivocally that it was the result of genetic engineering.
I'm no expert on the subject, but I seriously doubt that the swine flu germ has little Hoffmann–La Roche logos on its cells.
Originally posted by mike dangerously
I don't think this was just a mistake y'all this flu was a bio-weapon test.The CDC and the army's bio-weapon division were using this as an demonstration for some prospective client.