Photo-enhanced images show alien occupants in the Turkey footage

those Aliens reminded me of the the ones Dorothy Izatt captured with her camera.






[edit on 11-5-2009 by easynow]

Probably a minor point, but why would the alien's eyes appear to glow?
Ours don't glow.
Animals do, but only when exposed to an incoming light source. Flashlight, headlights etc.
I have read many reports about large dark eyes, but I don't recall glowing eyes.
Or is that just a side effect of the picture enhancement?

I'm appalled by the seeming lack of knowledge or experience with video recording or filming evident in most of these posts. Complaining about the video being shaky or blurry? At that distance we're very lucky with the quality of the footage we have. It was clear to me upon first viewing that he was using a teleconverter by reduction in light, diffraction and chromatic aberration present when zoomed in on it. It is very difficult to get a stable image(even just going handheld and using a standard lens, say 50mm or so) zoomed in fully just with the lenses capabilities, let alone with a teleconverter and even considering the camera he used, a gl1, it just doesn't have the weight to help with stability. I'm not sure on this but I really think he was using a tripod, a very cheap one like the ones available at target or wal mart and not a ballhead one(which are expensive). I do cinematography for a living and was and still am amazed at the quality of this footage.

Originally posted by Sabreblade
Probably a minor point, but why would the alien's eyes appear to glow?
Ours don't glow.
Animals do, but only when exposed to an incoming light source. Flashlight, headlights etc.
I have read many reports about large dark eyes, but I don't recall glowing eyes.
Or is that just a side effect of the picture enhancement?

What exactly do any of us know about alien biology?

Originally posted by Sabreblade
Probably a minor point, but why would the alien's eyes appear to glow?
Ours don't glow.
Animals do, but only when exposed to an incoming light source. Flashlight, headlights etc.
I have read many reports about large dark eyes, but I don't recall glowing eyes.
Or is that just a side effect of the picture enhancement?

They could simply be reflective, or something similar, if the beings in the craft are nocturnal.
Apart from that, the Nordian or Aryan type of ET's have been described to sometimes have allmost luminous eyes, and if so, other races may very well have that too.

In this newspaper from Turkey Yalcin Yalman shows the video frame during an interview.
This case is by now famous in Tukey and has been covered by all media in that country.
Then undoubtedly it means the case has hierarchy.





[edit on 11-5-2009 by free_spirit]

[edit on 11-5-2009 by free_spirit]

Originally posted by free_spirit

This case is by now famous in Tukey and has been covered by all media in that country.
Then undoubtedly it means the case has hierarchy.

It also 'undoubtedly' means someone has made a nice Lira or two out of it.

Nothing in this clip stands out as valid to me - particularly the nice little ET couple that conveniently follow the arc of the camera as it tracks. Very thoughtful of them.

reply to post by free_spirit


so in the newspaper article he mentions he first saw an ufo when he was just 14 years old and years later following the death of his father he went and bought this expensive camera equipment spending all of the inheritance money and waited "patiently" for 5 months aliens to "show up" and "it's a passion for him". he says he will continue to shoot images of them.

i dont know really.. i live in istanbul maybe I should just start doing the same, lol. maybe they show up

btw if anyone needs a turkish translation you know who to u2u.....

[edit on 11-5-2009 by SeelenJaeger]

I have to thank Mike Singh for bringing up the issue of scale, it didn't really cross my mind. Those really would be some big aliens unless the craft was very close and low.

Also, the "windshield" effect does concern me. For some reason I wouldn't expect super-advanced aircrafts to have clear windshields. Pilots who fly our airplanes here on Earth don't even really need to see out of the windshield because they can use radar.

If it is a windshield on the UFO, then the heads of the aliens appear to be sticking up past where the top of the windshield would be... and I really doubt they are flying around our atmosphere in a convertible with the top down.

I think it's laughable. Two little aliens jamming their faces into a window to look out. I mean, really. Even if the geometry wasn't such that there would be essentially no headroom, and the windows and bulkheads of the thing would have to be paper thin. Ridiculous.

Originally posted by SeelenJaeger
reply to post by free_spirit

 

btw if anyone needs a turkish translation you know who to u2u.....

[edit on 11-5-2009 by SeelenJaeger]

You should contact:
ARMAP, so he can add you to the UFO-Alien Applied Linguistics Registry

Thanks for the offer!

Edit: Ah! I see you are already on there. Awesome.

[edit on 5/11/2009 by greeneyedleo]

reply to post by Sabreblade




what you are seeing as the "eyes" are actually the "heads" it does look like one giant head with glowing eyes, i know what you mean, but dont look at as one big being, look at the image as they are in a dark room and the light is reflecting off their foreheads. if that helps any

[edit on 11-5-2009 by k4sp3r]

Quoted from member Pjotr

Ha cute with the "bobbing" heads in the center.

Whats even "funnier" is that is reportedly actually how the Greys head movement is. It was also observed in the "Alien Interview" video, and is reported by multiple abductees. One must look at the little things in these cases, the things that most hoaxers wouldn't know or take the time to recreate. And yes, the similarities to the alien in the "Alien Interview" film is astounding.

Image from "Alien Interview" courtesy of bloggernews.net



Now let's look at the best available image of the "beings" in the craft...




Unfortunately it appears a likely legitimate case with smoking gun potential has been another victim of the extreme disorganization within the UFO research community. This happens all the time, there is always scattered reports and discrepancies due to lack of organization and quickness of investigation. I guess that's where they want us though right? Ufology needs to become unified and more professional so (like what always happens, and is the case here) we're not running around like a chicken with it's head cut off everytime something big happens in the field.

I also agree it is nessicary to re start threads of the same, but older more important topics. It brings about new attention and allows newer members and visitors ease of access to the information, rather than searching the vast void of ATS threads.

As far as the ISS theory, I don't know, maybe some shots but it doesn't really matter, what we need to be concerned about is the main footage, that is definitely not the ISS!!! LOL, unless we want to get into a whole other conspiracy on NASA having strange beings pilot a super-advanced space craft!

Great post, star and flag from me. I hope to see this case get much more attention, and am glad UFO Hunters is going to do a piece on it.

The cases keep mounting......

[edit on 5/11/2009 by jkrog08]

What I see is three heads,the third being in the centre and behind
(if heads is what they are)
if there are only two heads the guy on the right must have a big dent in the middle of his nut.
The non-youtube video is really good and shows everything much clearer,
although I don't see the captured frame above on it,(2007)
There is no picture of the ISS near the start either,it's the same object
from a different angle,(more to the underneath) and while the brightness
in the middle does resemble the ISS a bit,I can clearly see rounded Delta
shaped wings to the sides,
(maybe this is something to do with the screens we are looking at)?
The bright crescent seen then disappearing is the object turning from a side angle to more frontal.

This video is showing nothing more than just a house on a high cliff shot in the dark so you won't see the cliff line. The shaky effect is done on purpose so you can't focus too long or you would see this. The daylight footage out over the ocean is simply a fishing troller. Move along now nothing to see here.

reply to post by Sabreblade


AS somebody else has said it's not the eyes that glowing. The bright parts are the forehead. If you look below the bright parts you will see the dark eye shapes.

Originally posted by k4sp3r
reply to post by Sabreblade

 

what you are seeing as the "eyes" are actually the "heads" it does look like one giant head with glowing eyes, i know what you mean, but dont look at as one big being, look at the image as they are in a dark room and the light is reflecting off their foreheads. if that helps any

[edit on 11-5-2009 by k4sp3r]

And why would you copy the image I uploaded here on ATS in our own Media for
all the members and then exported the image to your own place at Photobucket
under a different name as “movieposter1” instead of doing the right thing and
post the original ATS media link with the original name?

What is your game here k4sp3r?

[edit on 11-5-2009 by free_spirit]

Now i've watched the video three times and what bothers me most is how he shifts between the alleged UFO and the Moon. "Ah there is the moon, where is it now .." *CLIP* seems he turns off the recorder while "searching for the ufo", then *CLIP* "Ah, there it is, its moving fast'. A continuous pan with the camera would have been more credible, what did he do in between ?


[edit on 2009/5/12 by reugen]

I want to ask something.
Why all of his videos of the closeup UFO start zoommed in ? Is it possible to start recording while already zoomed in ? And is there any video of the closeups where he actually zoomes out and any background can be distinct, exept the supposedly blurry moon ?

reply to post by nforcer
Hi,
You need to look at the link for the video of the cameraman
being interviewed,to hear what he was doing at the time, and why.