It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by elevatedone
So you're okay with people being outdoors with no clothes on?
I'm not. Where there children around?
Are you saying you think it preferable for children to witness a man forced to the ground, have his hair pulled, get "knee-dropped" in the gut, and be repeatedly tazered in a way that has killed many people in the past, than to see a little more skin than they're used to and a "wee-wee" smaller than their own?
I know which I'd rather my children saw.
If I'd been there I'd have stepped forward and stripped off in protest.
Originally posted by elevatedone
reply to post by drwizardphd
So you're okay with people being outdoors with no clothes on?
I'm not. Where there children around?
Originally posted by samhouston1886
reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
I don't need to understand being "Sky clad" anymore than you have to understand why Jews don't eat pork.
If this man was a Rabbi this whole forum would be going Ape S.
Regardless of how you feel about it being naked in public is against the law.
A jury will convict him based on the video evidence.
He became combative after he ignored MANY requests to put his clothes on.
The fact that you are defending a man who was on drugs and naked in a venue where children are present tells me that you have issues.
I don't care to have my child exposed to someone who is "Sky Clad"
any more than someone who is a member of nambla,