It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Regarding Wendelle admitting that billy used models. I demand you to show me proof of this exerp. If you dont then i demand you to retract your comments.
easynow please to save trouble for other colleagues, provide a link or proof of your accusations such as these tests and enhancements. Or how can anyione take you seriously if you never provide your source.
Regarding Kal Korff. Any referances from him is considered a joke even from skeptics nowadays. Kal Korff is delusional and lying.
Originally posted by easynow
yep your right just saying something doesn't make it true
so that means Meier's claims cannot be taken as truth. period
it's been more than just "explained away". selective logic on your part
Originally posted by neo2012
reply to post by Indigo_Child
The billy meier case is based on videos and pictures so lets stop talking about the oval shaped hole the raygun shot into a tree when there is no evidence to back this up.
You keep saying that you most likely dont believe the raygun to be real and yet you keep talking about this oval shaped hole.
Also you say that the skeptics keep talking only about the raygun, dinosaur, spacesuit and wedding cake UFO and that we should look at the rest of the evidence but you cant just discard this evidence as it makes up a large part of the case.
When i started reading about the limitations the aliens placed on the evidence that could be gathered i began to become skeptical. Why couldnt he film them landing and getting out of one of these crafts?
Originally posted by EffEcTiVe_UniT
@easynow. How does the interview with bily meier and randy winters prove that wendelle stevens admitted to models? Wendelle isnt even in this interview.
If the Figu community was in it for the money would you think they would make more then only maybe 4k swiss francs a year? Thinking they would be money hungry they would charge higher or charge everything on all their materials. No they dont, in fact their books are dirt cheap and thast just to cover the manufacturing costs. The information itself is pretty much free. So using the children as an excuse for monetary gain is self defeating to all that figu stands for.
Regarding to Kal Korff, do you not hear what he says? He has several conflicting stories such as the accusations of his secre service to "do away" with billy, the law suit, which still hasnt happen, his book deal which never happened, and so on.
The gold suit. The one you provided seems like its seemed into the suit that is under it. The one that is with billy has wrinkles in it. Is it possible for you tp provide a picture with a gold wrapper or some sort with wrinkles? Or atleast posing the same way the Et is posing so we can duplicate the wrinkles?
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by Indigo_Child
I did a search for gold-foil to see I can get anything similar to the Pleadian gold suit.
plenty of options for the explanation of the Gold suit...
Space Blanket
Manufacturing
First developed by NASA in 1964 for the US space program[1], the material consists of a thin sheet of plastic (often PET film) that is coated with a metallic reflecting agent, usually gold or silver in color, which reflects up to 97% of radiated heat.[2][3]
In the US, space blankets are made by vacuum depositing a very precise amount of pure aluminum vapor onto a very thin, durable film substrate.
more options...
what does this prove ?....it proves that it could be fake, there was plenty of gold material he could have used. unless of course you believe the Pleaidians gave us the material....
I want conclusive proof if people are going to claim that the dino pic is from the illustration. "Looks like" is not enough. A demonstration that using the illustration you can duplicate Meiers pic exactly is what I want.
will this satisfy you ?.........
without a doubt...they are the same picture. stop denying it. anyone can easily see that the picture was from the book.
[edit on 17-4-2009 by easynow]
[edit on 17-4-2009 by easynow]
Originally posted by neo2012
reply to post by Frankinmouse
I dont think the billy meier case has been brought to the masses. You only know about it if you take an interest in UFOs.
If they puposefully gave evidence that cannot be proved hoax or real then why do believers try and prove it real?
Skeptics obviously try to prove them fake as they dont believe the aliens exist so cant believe something they supposedly said.