It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Though a little rough on the outside you have a very good mind...if you haven't already, take a look at some of my threads located in my signature, particularly Enforced Logic - Reality and "Magic". It's fairly long so don't worry about it if you don't have the time. I've been learning java all day and it's quite late here now so I'll talk more tomorrow when I have some time. Peace out...CHA0S out.
If philosophy is asking questions about questions, these, then, would be questions about questions about questions...
Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by Solace
That's exactly what I have always thought but couldn't put it into words. Recently though...I'm not so sure if it's really that simple...there seems to be more to time than I first thought...
I would have to agree even though most wouldn't...since I think essentially anything is possible...it's not a leap to assume that a creator exist...whether it created us...I don't know...but even we are creators...so that automatically makes it fact...you didn't specify what they create...even though I do think that one day humans will create life...or AI as some may call it...
Originally posted by symmetricAvenger
a creator is not a concept its a fact
I don't believe that to be true...some things have no end nor a start....does that mean they never existed? It can mean that...or it can mean they always did exist...I actually think time never did exist...and still doesn't...think about it...
Originally posted by symmetricAvenger
and create = purpose there is always a start and an end
What created the universe? and what created what ever created the universe...and what created what ever created that...and so on...
Originally posted by symmetricAvenger
What i am saying is that a paining was a tree. what created the tree? "the planet" what created the planet? the universe!
Could it be that evolution and survival of the fittest created us by a way of method?
Originally posted by symmetricAvenger
so i would create as more of a coming together of things, so if something created us it was by a way of method.
Originally posted by A Conscience
To put my 2 cents worth here in a very lay unscientific person's concept.
What if our whole universe is equivalent to just one single cell among the billions of cell that make up an entity's body. In turn, this entity is living in an environment with other entities and view their world existing in a universe like what we are experiencing. Only this universe is but a single cell in yet another entity's body. And so on.
This way, the idea of a creator becomes obsolete.
This is also my version of infinity.
That's essentially the exact concept I was trying to get across...and that it goes the other way as well...meaning one cell in my body is a universe...obviously it would be more like one quark or something much, much smaller...
Originally posted by A Conscience
What if our whole universe is equivalent to just one single cell among the billions of cell that make up an entity's body. In turn, this entity is living in an environment with other entities and view their world existing in a universe like what we are experiencing. Only this universe is but a single cell in yet another entity's body. And so on.
That's a fairly abstract concept...I basically assumed that we would be separate from the super-consciousness...like we have our own independent minds...but we are still a part of this consciousness...all of our minds...and every mind in the universe or in existence act as one when put together and viewed with a wider scope...just like the subconscious and conscious mind seem to be separate entities with minds of their own...we are all sub-consciousnesses in the mind of a super consciousness...I'm still having a hard time grasping what you are inferring...is it something along those lines?
Originally posted by Most Infamous
"How do you measure the center of everywhere? Anywhere could be the center of everywhere." If the universe is never ending (by definition, the universe contains everything and is never ending) then theoretically everywhere and anywhere is the center and hence all places are the same, all space is one space, the center. Ok, that being said, where does God/super consciousness fit in? Well, if all space is one, then take the space inside you where your consciousness dwells. That seat of consciousness is the same as all spaces, which means that your consciousness is what permiates all of creation. Now comes the big leap of faith. forget about your conscious and imagine that this consciousness the permiates all space is God consciousness or the Super consciousness. I mean its all the smae consciousness so who cares? It is only a man's limited ego that makes him say it's MY consciousness, (or to say that I have become God).
Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by Solace
I'm going to have to agree with most of what you say...I'll have to do some more thinking...time is simple but so complex...hmm...
That's a fairly abstract concept...I basically assumed that we would be separate from the super-consciousness...like we have our own independent minds...but we are still a part of this consciousness...all of our minds...and every mind in the universe or in existence act as one when put together and viewed with a wider scope...just like the subconscious and conscious mind seem to be separate entities with minds of their own...we are all sub-consciousnesses in the mind of a super consciousness...I'm still having a hard time grasping what you are inferring...is it something along those lines?
Originally posted by CHA0S