It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Yes it is sick when done in a society which it is not part of the NORM. In this case it is part of the NORM, so it can't be called SICK. It can however be called for what it is, simply the codification of the animal instincts of a DOG.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Yes it is sick when done in a society which it is not part of the NORM. In this case it is part of the NORM, so it can't be called SICK. It can however be called for what it is, simply the codification of the animal instincts of a DOG.
I understand what you are saying and I understand you dont like it either.
It is NOT the instinct of a dog. Dogs dont even do this to their puppies. This is SICK because it IS against instinct. It is sick because it IS against nature. It is sick because it is not normal for any animal or human to do this.
Dogs do not have sex with puppies. Your wrong about that. They have sex with everything else but not puppies.
IT IS SICK!
[edit on 12-4-2009 by LoneGunMan]
Arizona: If you are 16 or 17 years old, you must have the notarized consent of your parents or legal guardian. If you are under 16, you must have the notarized consent of your parents or legal guardian as well as a court order
Minnesota: Applicants between the ages of 15 and 18 must have the consent of a parent, guardian or the judge of juvenile court. ²Applicants younger than 15 needs the written consent of a parent of guardian and the consent of a juvenile court judge
In his words," We were driving, turned a corner. the car headlights panned across a field- illuminated by the headlights, myself and my companions were confronted with the spectacle of man having amorous relations with a donkey". That was my friends first impressions of Saudi. Upon his appointment at the hospital, in his daily duties it was a reasonable estimation to assume that at least 85-90% of children that were admitted had been subject to repeated sodomy.