Bush's connections and now a possible connection to controlled demo consulting and planning company

a reply to: Informer1958

That doesn't fly because it took WTC 7 some 17 seconds to fully collapse and that is not free fall speed.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Apparently, when you have folks like Veterans Today, Hardcore 9/11 conspiracy theorist, "OS" folks, and then, have support workers jumping ship of "AE 911 Truth," what more is there to say?

Who care what you believe about Truthers.

The fact is, most OS are jumping ship and are supporting A&E.

a reply to: Informer1958

Truthers or not, "AE 911 Truth" has been attack by all sides for its deception routines and outright lies.

a reply to: skyeagle409

That doesn't fly because it took WTC 7 some 17 seconds to fully collapse and that is not free fall speed.

The fact is, this is another one of your proven fallacies, DEBUNKED in this thread in the OP.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Truthers or not, "AE 911 Truth" has been attack by all sides for its deception routines and outright lies.

Another fallacies.


Pushing fabrication, you have been DEBUNKED in all accounts in your desperate attempts in supporting the OS conspiracy theories.

a reply to: Informer1958

That doesn't fly and as proof, you cannot prove your case with evidence for everyone on this thread.

a reply to: Informer1958

Evidence please! No evidence, no case. The challenge for you is to prove me wrong with evidence for everyone on this thread. Failing than, it will be evident that you have no case.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Truthers or not, "AE 911 Truth" has been attack by all sides for its deception routines and outright lies.

According to 911 Myths and Debunking 911.com

Real Truthers stand behind real credible science not the "proven" OS pseudo, propaganda, monkey vomit.

a reply to: skyeagle409

That doesn't fly and as proof, you cannot prove your case with evidence for everyone on this thread.

Another fallacy.

I and many ATS have debunked you in every single case. And the proof is you cannot debunk any of the science so all you have left is ridicule as you just demonstrated.

a reply to: Informer1958

Basically speaking, "AE 911 Truth" is a joke.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Evidence please! No evidence, no case. The challenge for you is to prove me wrong with evidence for everyone on this thread. Failing than, it will be evident that you have no case.

A mountain of very creditably evidence has been given to you. The fact is you have ignored every single bit of it, and have only ridiculed it at beat.

a reply to: Informer1958

Another fallacy.

I and many ATS have debunked you in every single case.

I am glad that I didn't have a cup of hot coffee in my hand when you said that!!

To sum it up, you cannot debunk with evidence, my claims, because you have no such evidence to present.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Basically speaking, "AE 911 Truth" is a joke.

Yes, I expect that coming from you, because A&E proves your OS is a grate big fat lie.

a reply to: skyeagle409

I am glad that I didn't have a cup of hot coffee in my hand when you said that!!

To sum it up, you cannot debunk with evidence, my claims, because you have no such evidence to present.

Fallacies. Anything else?

a reply to: Informer1958

A mountain of very creditably evidence has been given to you.

Let's take a look at those who have presented the evidence that fire in conjunction with impact damage, not explosives, was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings.

The Structural Engineering Community Rejects the Controlled-Demolition Conspiracy Theory

The structural engineering community rejects the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Its consensus is that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings was a fire-induced, gravity-driven collapse, an explanation that does not involve the use of explosives.

a reply to: Informer1958

Fallacies.

Evidence please! No evidence, no case.

Anything else?

yes!

NYC Police Saw Sign of Tower Collapse, Study Says (Update2)

June 18 (Bloomberg) -- Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the buildings' columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were about to fall.

www.bloomberg.com...

a reply to: skyeagle409

Let's take a look at those who have presented the evidence that fire in conjunction with impact damage, not explosives, was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings.

Another fallacy.

No sources no credibility.

a reply to: skyeagle409

NYC Police Saw Sign of Tower Collapse, Study Says (Update2)

June 18 (Bloomberg) -- Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the buildings' columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were about to fall.

www.bloomberg.com...

No thank you, Yellow Journalism doesn't work for me, nice try though.

a reply to: Informer1958

That won't fly either. Case in point.

Why the World Trade Center Buildings Collapsed: A Fire Chief ’s Assessment

The jet collapsed the ceilings and scraped most of the spray-on fire retarding asbestos from the steel trusses. The steel truss floor supports probably started to fail quickly from the flames and the center steel supporting columns severed by plane parts heated by the flames began to buckle, sag, warp and fail. Then the top part of the tower crashed down on the lower portion of the structure. This pancake collapse triggered the entire cascading collapse of the 110-story structure.

vincentdunn.com...

a reply to: Informer1958

I guess you don't want to argue with the NYPD about what they saw just before the WTC buildings collapsed.