Bush's connections and now a possible connection to controlled demo consulting and planning company

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Informer1958

Your links have been debunked by civil and structural engineers, architects, demolition experts and seismograph operators.

To sum it up, you have no case.

Only in your tortured mind.

For those of us who are curious and open-minded, the official story fails under scrutiny.

a reply to: HorusChrist

that's true come on folks don't open yourself up for ridicule, don't try to act like the show get smart was proof of anything here

Basically speaking, that is what 9/11 conspiracy theorist have been doing for years, that is, opening themselves up for ridicule. Case in point is where Steven Jones duped 9/11 conspiracy theorist with this photo.

Photo: Is this Really Evidence of Molten Steel?

Have you seen the video?

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: HorusChrist

that's true come on folks don't open yourself up for ridicule, don't try to act like the show get smart was proof of anything here

Basically speaking, that is what 9/11 conspiracy theorist have been doing for years, that is, opening themselves up for ridicule. Case in point is where Steven Jones duped 9/11 conspiracy theorist with this photo.

Photo: Is this Really Evidence of Molten Steel?

Have you seen the video?

what video, that is a photo like you said.

if it wasn't molten steel they wouldn't have destroyed the evidence. 911research.wtc7.net...

a reply to: HorusChrist

what video, that is a photo like you said.

This video.



It is amazing how Steven Jones so easily duped 9/11 conspiracy theorist that a flashlight reflection was molten steel. Simply amazing!!

if it wasn't molten steel they wouldn't have destroyed the evidence. 911research.wtc7.net...

There are those who have claimed that molten steel months after 9/11 was evidence of thermite, but since when does thermite leave behind molten steel minutes, days, much less, months after ignition? Who was the person who managed to duped the Truth Movement into believing such nonsense? Take a guess?

still tho, why do you think they were so quick to destroy the evidence.

a reply to: HorusChrist

What evidence? First of all, you have to prove that demolition explosions are heard in the WTC videos. Failing that, you have no case for demolition explosives because there is no evidence for demolition explosives at ground zero.

The claim that demolition explosives were used to demolish the WTC buildings was fabricated, and done so without a shred of evidence.

a reply to: HorusChrist

why do you think they were so quick to destroy the evidence.

So you admit that there's no evidence.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: HorusChrist

What evidence? First of all, you have to prove that demolition explosions are heard in the WTC videos. Failing that, you have no case for demolition explosives because there is no evidence for demolition explosives at ground zero.

The claim that demolition explosives were used to demolish the WTC buildings was fabricated, and done so without a shred of evidence.

Only in your mind...

originally posted by: HorusChrist
still tho, why do you think they were so quick to destroy the evidence.

Because they had something to hide, if not why prohibit the taking of photos at ground zero by the public..

a reply to: wildb

Only in your mind...

Backed by facts, evidence and the laws of physics, which is why you are unable to post the demolition explosion timelines in the WTC videos.

a reply to: wildb

Because they had something to hide, if not why prohibit the taking of photos at ground zero by the public..

Where were these photos taken?

Photo 1: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 2: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 3: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 4: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 5: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 6: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 7: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 8: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 9: WTC Ground Zero

Photo 10: WTC Ground Zero

a reply to: skyeagle409

Because they had something to hide, if not why prohibit the taking of photos at ground zero BY THE PUBLIC...

a reply to: wildb

What if someone took their photo of a body at ground zero and posted that photo on the Internet without notifying the family of the victim?

Bush jr. was too unintelligent to have caused 9/11/2001. Being unintellectual actually excludes Bush from culpability in this matter.

Wih that being said, every aspect of this incident had cronies involved and controlling the media perception of the event.

It won't go away in our minds but we do know the full truth. At least I do. Life moves on.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: HorusChrist

that's true come on folks don't open yourself up for ridicule, don't try to act like the show get smart was proof of anything here

Basically speaking, that is what 9/11 conspiracy theorist have been doing for years, that is, opening themselves up for ridicule. Case in point is where Steven Jones duped 9/11 conspiracy theorist with this photo.

Photo: Is this Really Evidence of Molten Steel?

Have you seen the video?

a reply to: aj023

Bush jr. was too unintelligent to have caused 9/11/2001. Being unintellectual actually excludes Bush from culpability in this matter.

Wih that being said, every aspect of this incident had cronies involved and controlling the media perception of the event.

It won't go away in our minds but we do know the full truth. At least I do. Life moves on.

There was no way the government carried out 9/11, and it would not have taken much to identify those involved in such an operation and remember, only a certain number of B-767-200 and B-757-200 series aircraft were built and the airlines would not have grounded their aircraft for many months in order to have them modified to fly into buildings.

We can also take a look at intelligence warnings flowing in from around the world that were pointing their fingers at Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, not at the United States.

a reply to: skyeagle409

There was no way the government carried out 9/11, and it would not have taken much to identify those involved in such an operation and remember, only a certain number of B-767-200 and B-757-200 series aircraft were built and the airlines would not have grounded their aircraft for many months in order to have them modified to fly into buildings.

Yes they could have, but it didn't have to be them, as for the seconded part thats just dumb..

a reply to: skyeagle409

We can also take a look at intelligence warnings flowing in from around the world that were pointing their fingers at Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, not at the United States.

Yes all these warnings, you have convinced me it was indeed an inside job...

a reply to: wildb

Yes they could have, but it didn't have to be them,....

That does not reflect reality. It has been 14 years since 9/11 and still no evidence of an inside job, which is understandable considering that countries around the world issued intelligence warnings to the United States that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda would be responsible.

as for the seconded part thats just dumb..

Of course its dumb to think the airlines would have grounded their aircraft to have them modified to fly under remote control, and since only a certain number of those aircraft were built and traceable, there was no way the government could have switched the aircraft and not get caught. In fact, it would take me 30 minutes or less to reveal a switched aircraft because it that easy.

That is does not reflect reality. It has been 14 years since 9/11 and still no evidence of an inside job

a reply to: skyeagle409

Never heard of the Jersey Girls?

which is understandable considering that countries around the world issued intelligence warnings to the United States that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda would be responsible.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Then again they knew and did nothing, I think thats fits inside job one way or another..