It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by themamayada
I do have to ask this probably crazy question: is it really that bad to have a one world gov't and/or one banking system? It might make more sense if we all worked together and had similar currency systems, etc. Now granted, our founding fathers purposely set up 3 branches of gov't for the whole checks-and-balance theory, so that no one part could become tyrannical. But I struggle to find why this one-world concept is so bad? Help me understand?
Originally posted by interested-one
Originally posted by bringthelight
Ron Paul must be so sick of saying the same thing over and over again. He has been saying it for years and few people listen. I guess NWO take over, new currency, NA union will all have to just happen because no body listens to the man who has successfully predicted the trouble we are in today.
WHY dont we listen to people like him instead of the people who got us here in the first place! It boggles the mind...i guess too many people already swallowed the blue pill.
I agree! You know when I went to vote I wanted to vote for Ron Paul but he was not an option in our voting machines here in Indiana for whatever reason. Not sure if he dropped out or what but he had my vote, if only for the fact that he is a patriot with a clue. Still couldn't get myself to vote for Obama.
Originally posted by caballero
We shoulda let the banks fail it was the only way we could have stopped them from joining together. When they join together they become the most powerful economic entity in the world and as the saying goes "money is power".
Its bad what we are getting ourselves into. We either have to stop what happening now or prepare for one hell of a revolution.
Originally posted by bringthelight
Ron Paul must be so sick of saying the same thing over and over again.