911 Truth: Condition-Terminal

ok so there is all this talk about site hits in the last 3 months. and please forgive me for not posting sites to back this up. its 10pm at night and i'm in the middle of iraq. Lets just say its been a very long day and leave it at that. (so if anyone else feels like following up on this and verifying for me please feel free.) Has anyone bothered to look at how many people have lost their jobs in the last 3 months? what was it like 1.5million or so? How would that affect internet traffic on any site if chunk like that couldn't afford internet anymore? Isn't all this arguing over 9.11 in vain? It has been about 40 years since the JFK incident and as far as I know we still don't have all the facts. And that was just a president. You think the Gov't is going to ever be forthcoming with all of the facts when it killed thousands of people? There are more important issues. Such as our economy is screwed, and yet we are still trying to fight multiple wars on multiple fronts. Everyone is arguing over the conspiracy of 9.11. How about the fact that myself and all the other military members that are fighting the pointless war. I've missed half my marriage and half of my children's lives. Lets fix the situation then worry about the conspiracy.

sorry about the rant. didn't intend to start that. but it was a needed vent

Originally posted by CameronFox
This guy who claims to have done so much research is posting an article that was corrected by the BBC. You have failed to once again listen to the answers that were provided.

Is this the "correction" you're referring to?

We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view:

"The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers."

OK CF, I'm convinced!

reply to post by GoldenFleece


Okay Golden.. you go ahead and hold onto the original BBC report that they admitted they made a mistake on. That's what you do. You can't let the facts get in the way of your fantasy.

I understand Golden.

Here is the complete response regarding the BBC report: (lets stay on topic please)

A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time.

We recently asked the FBI for a statement, and this is, as things stand, the closest thing we have to a definitive view: The FBI is confident that it has positively identified the nineteen hijackers responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, the 9/11 investigation was thoroughly reviewed by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and the House and Senate Joint Inquiry. Neither of these reviews ever raised the issue of doubt about the identity of the nineteen hijackers.

www.bbc.co.uk...

[edit on 16-2-2009 by CameronFox]

Originally posted by Make Speed Limit 45
The truthers are paranoid...

Another fallacy made by the numerous anonymous "debunkers".

If "truthers" are so paranoid as "debunkers" like CF claim, why is it only "Truthers" put their face and name to their claims and "debunkers" refuse to debate their claims anywhere but from behind their screens... anonymously?

"Debunkers" use the excuse they remain anonymous because they think "truthers" will come and kill them. "Debunkers" are the "paranoid and delusional". Not the "Truthers".

(disclaimer: "debunkers" in quotes since its clear they arent real debunkers. "Truthers" in quotes since they are really patriots.)

Originally posted by CameronFox

I see Captain Bob sent one of his very few supporters.

You may want to look at the stars per post on this thread regarding "supporters".

Someone here has a problem reading, but i dont think its me.

reply to post by RockHound757


So, you are here counting stars? How noble of you. I am a skeptic in a conspiracy theory site. Hmmm... I would tend to think I would not be very popular around here.

reply to post by CameronFox

Where did the BBC say they made a mistake? About four different hijackers, including statements from them and their families? What about the Saudi Airlines pilot "hijacker" who walked into a U.S. embassy and asked why he was wanted for murdering 3000 people?

I don't get it. When you publicly accuse people of mass murder and release their photos, birth dates and personal information, where is the confusion? Are you saying there was more than one hijacker with the same photo, passport and date of birth?

The UK Telegraph never retracted or explained anything when they reported:


The story of these identity thefts was also briefly reported by ABC. The FBI does not deny this. Nobody denies this fact because it is easily verifiable. Instead, the U.S. media and government just ignore this inconvenient little fact and keeps on repeating the monstrous lie that the hijacker identities are known and that 15 of them were Saudis.

CNN revealed that FBI director Robert Mueller openly admitted that some of the identities of the 9/11 hijackers are in question due to identity theft. Here's what CNN reported on September 21:


Cameron, can you explain this mess? Does the FBI even know the identity of these so-called "hijackers"? Did they even exist? Why does the FBI now say "there's not enough hard evidence against Osama bin Laden to send to a Grand Jury?"

Originally posted by CameronFox
Although maybe not "death threats" in the legal sense.

Yes, they are only "death threats" from the lying, paranoid delusional "debunkers" sense. We know.

Oh... and good luck with all those starts champ!

I dont need to count the stars. But it seems you do since you think there are "very few supporters". Was just pointing it out to you to since it appears your fallacies (and perhaps ignorance) are getting worse.

Once again. enjoy your day off (and nights, and working days) fighting a "movement" you think is "terminal".

reply to post by GoldenFleece


Make a thread regarding the hijackers. I will be more than happy to answer your questions there. This thread is about the 911 truth movement.

Thank you for not derailing any further.

Rockhound... I would appreciate the same consideration from you.

Originally posted by CameronFox
reply to post by RockHound757

 

So, you are here counting stars? How noble of you. I am a skeptic in a conspiracy theory site. Hmmm... I would tend to think I would not be very popular around here.

As far as I know sceptics are welcome around ATS - they actually perform a useful service...

They don't usually go around starting lame threads like this though


[edit on 16/2/2009 by alienanderson]

Originally posted by RockHound757

Evasions noted.

Thank you for adding nothing to this thread. "rockhound"

Originally posted by alienanderson


As far as I know sceptics are welcome around ATS - they actually perform a useful service...

They don't usually go around starting lame threads like this though

Why would you bother responding if it is lame? What's wrong? Truth hurt?

Originally posted by CameronFox

Originally posted by alienanderson


As far as I know sceptics are welcome around ATS - they actually perform a useful service...

They don't usually go around starting lame threads like this though

Why would you bother responding if it is lame? What's wrong? Truth hurt?

I just don't like trolls is all

2nd line

Originally posted by RockHound757
"Truthers" put their face and name to their claims and "debunkers" refuse to debate their claims anywhere but from behind their screens... anonymously?

Back on topic.

This: patriotsquestion911.com...

Yeah...this site is screaming with success.

Percent of global Internet users who visit this site down 27%

Traffic rank based on a combined measure of page views and users (reach):

down 126,728

RockHound? I didn't see you "real name" on there? Or did I? OR are you too "hiding behind your screen?"

reply to post by alienanderson


If I were trolling, I would have received a warning.

I started a thread and presented data to back it up.

Sorry if it bothers you.