It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lewtra
reply to post by mrjenka
What I am saying is,how do you explain the reported crafts that have no sound?
O.k I will put it simple...You are saying that all the UFO are military.So how do you explain the mountains of evidence that proves otherwise.It is like a circle round and round.SHOW some solid proof that will put our mind to rest that Ufo are MAN MADE.
Lewtra
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Hello. I'd like to know if these are your theories based on your research? If so, how did you perform your research (i.e. the internet, conversations with scientists, etc...). If they are not theories, then I would assume you are telling us that they are facts? I'm a little confused as to where you're coming from.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by mrjenka
It's funny that you would ask for straight hard facts, when you have provided none, absolutely none. Not a news reference, hell not even a wiki page for us to confirm of what you say.
As I said previously, the point of this thread, if not complete BS would be to inform us of something that you know while telling us how you know, and showing us alteast something to validate you're claim.
You're refusal to do so, does not make you more credible, it makes you less credible.
How does some employee in the accounting department, come accross all of these things. You'd think if these are secret projects, then they would have secret financial employees doing they're paperwork.
What do you know, and HOW did you come across it?
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by Iamonlyhuman
Hello. I'd like to know if these are your theories based on your research? If so, how did you perform your research (i.e. the internet, conversations with scientists, etc...). If they are not theories, then I would assume you are telling us that they are facts? I'm a little confused as to where you're coming from.
Originally posted by stonespiral
Okay, first of all, if you're going to claim to have all this knowledge and know so much about doing research and yada yada yada.
Please enhance your ability to use correct grammar. "you're" is used whenever you would normally say "you are" and other such examples.
Second, Nobody is going to care about what you say when your tone is so smug. The only reason I read this whole thread was to see if it kept going.
You have nothing but a few words that amount to absolutely nothing. You come in here and claim people need to think for themselves and many do, and many have done extensive research on these topics and have found that they believe these are alien craft. Having the technology to build such craft does not mean that any of them are man-made. Until you can show us why you're right and we're wrong I don't see where your point is because it's useless if there's nothing leading to it.
For all we know you actually work at 7-11 and like to make claims that you can't back up just for fun.
I suggest acting a little less holier than thou, it goes a long way.
[edit on 2/15/2009 by stonespiral]
Many crafts are MAN-MADE!
Also, there is NO ONE in this world that knows everything. there is a handful of people that know a little piece of the story, they do not know each other and what they know may seem insignificant to them but when you put all of the pieces of the story together you may have something monumental.
Originally posted by impaired
Originally posted by mrjenka
Many crafts are MAN-MADE!
MANY, you said. You did not say all. Is there a slight implementation in that statement that the rest are indeed ET?
Originally posted by mrjenka
Also, there is NO ONE in this world that knows everything. there is a handful of people that know a little piece of the story, they do not know each other and what they know may seem insignificant to them but when you put all of the pieces of the story together you may have something monumental.
Sounds like compartmentalization.
I look forward to your answers.
Peace.
Originally posted by Maxmars
I do not wish to antagonize you. But I will risk one more comment because it will complete my contribution to your thread.
You contend that there will be no disclosure. You profess a two-thirds or better chance that what is witnessed is simply uniformed people mistaking research and development activities as 'alien.' You have proclaimed that the presence of intelligences such as ours is a very very rare thing in the universe.
I suspect that your patience would be tested were I to 'argue' that none of these elements make your case for the denial of the legitimacy of UFOlogy (unless I am misunderstanding the gist of your OP). Rest assured I have questions regarding a great deal of your reasoning, were we to pursue such a debate I would start with my perception of your assumption that you would necessarily be 'in the loop' on the matter. That suggestion is not a negative factor on you personally, I have no beef with you. But you do seem to have a beef with those who entertain the possibility that your position is incorrect, at best, or simply ill-advised considering your choice of venue.
Nevertheless, thank you very much for the input, as I said before I think it's a good thread.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by mrjenka
Wow what an amazing ammount of BS this has been. Ridiculous.
Were all wasting our time with this person as he's contributed NOTHING to us or this website.
You sound like John Ashcroft when he use to come out on TV and say..I don't know where..I don't know when...but something bad is going to happen.
I don't mean to bash you personally, but you're making it very hard for us to take you seriously, when you're idea of research is to start reading aviation books and going to scientific meetings and gaining people's trust for them to give you information, so that you can use it for your own PERSONNAL research.
Now what would be the point of that? Why would anybody keep things like that secret and for what purpose? Because it could kill us all, trust me, there are millions of things in this world that could kill us all far easier than some spacecraft technology that's floating around out there.
Stop wasting our time with you're sorry excuse for first hand knowledge and facts when you haven't provided us with any. You haven't even provided us with theories of anything really.
It's like you're neck blew a bubble.
And I hope that I just read that wrong, when you stated that you worked for or in some weird side department of the DIA?
Come on...
~Keeper
[edit on 2/15/2009 by tothetenthpower]
Originally posted by branty
Most of the time when i listen or read post I look for what someone is not saying. This gentleman , MrJenga isnt saying anything, very easy post to follow. But i look to one of my fav ufo disclosure types, Mr Nick Pope. He says they send fighters up to shoot down these non-exsistant ufo's , so Jenga had better tell his non-exsistant employer to tell the ex MoD not to shoot them down . Be a shame to lose a 10 billion dollar machine with friendly fire.
reply to post by RFBurns
Hey.. thank you for your post. I am NOT saying that there is no proof. You guys may have misinterpreted what I was saying.
Your also looking at cave paintings and texts from people who believed in trees, rivers, ants and anything else they may have though was a god.. If by some miracle we could bring a human from 1500 years ago and put him in a cave now and just observe him we could deem him "insane" and "unstable" so, by todays measures these people were below average on the intellectual scale, so how can we take that seriously.
furthermore, if schizophrenia and other mental problems exist now than they most def. existed 1500 years ago, how can you convice me that these texts and cave paintings were not done by a person with a mental illness and than a generation later found these "texts" and "cave paintings" and since they were already scared of "gods" they maybe thought hat there ancestors were trying to send them a warning but what they didnt know is that the original painter was a mental ill person..
it's all bs, as is the bible.. the bible has been rewritten and reedited so many times no one can really tell what the original is and who really wrote it and when..
Originally posted by mrjenka
You have proof that "ancients" were better at astronomy than current day man? do you know what current day man or ancient man was capable of?
Respectfully, no, you do not. Your assuming and repeating stuff you read on the internet and on tv..