It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NativeAmerican
Uh? You do realize you shouldn't be calling someone a racist after this comment. My Palestinian friends might find it offensive. Prior to this you say that even the Palestinians know that Hamas is the problem and not Israel. So why would you say something so offensive? There's also a difference between being anti-semetic and having problems with Israel.
Originally posted by Terapin
To clarify my position:
I am not an anti semite. First, that word is misleading because the term Semite includes BOTH Arabs and Jews. I do agree that Israel has a right to exist, but I do not agree that Israel has the right to illegally occupy Palestinian territory, nor to wage a war of aggression against an occupied people. The People of Palestine have a right to a land of their own yet Zionism prevents that.
Why is it that Israel can violate the Geneva Conventions? Why is it that Israel can violate several UN mandates? Why is it that Israel can violate several international laws? If a Palestinian fights back against this illegal oppression, they get called a terrorist, when it is Israel that has been waging a war of terror and since it's inception. They seem to have no morals against using illegal weapons against civilians such as white phosphorus.
If Israel would abide by international law, and return the illegally occupied territory, then the majority of the problems there would end. It is time that Israel abide by the UN mandate and allow Palestinians 48% of the land.
Some Israelis believe they have the right to confiscate and colonize Palestinian land and try to justify the sustained subjugation and persecution of increasingly hopeless and aggravated Palestinians
That is Apartheid by definition.
Often excluded from their former homes, land, and places of worship, protesting Palestinians have been severely dominated and oppressed. There is forced segregation between Israeli settlers and Palestine's citizens, with a complex pass system required for Arabs to traverse Israel's multiple checkpoints.
Hamas has specifically stated that they would accept the State of Israel if they stuck to the pre '67 borders as those are the legal ones. They reaffirmed this statement recently.
UN Resolutions, the Camp David Accords of 1978, the Oslo Agreement of 1993, official US Policy, and the International Roadmap for Peace are all based on the premise that Israel withdraw from occupied territories. Also, Palestinians must accept the same commitment made by the 23 Arab nations in 2002: to recognize Israel's right to live in peace within its legal borders.
Originally posted by finemanm
1) what would you do, or want your government to do if lets say native americans started to blow themselves in the mall nearest to your home calling for the end of American and demanding their land back. What the US Government did to Native Americans is far worse than anything Israel did in merely trying to survive.
2) Do you believe that one country can negotiate with another that denies the right of the first country's right to exsit?
3) What have the palestinians ever suggested that you beleive was a fair request in negotiations that Israel ever said no to?
Answer these questions, and maybe we can have a healthy discourse. Call me names, and we all understand what your position really is.
Originally posted by finemanm
Originally posted by NativeAmerican
Woah, woah, guys. Come on now, read the posts.
I already said I was wrong to use the word "genocide". That's just how some of the articles I read labeled it. I now don't consider that word the right word. No reason to bring back posts that have already been discussed. I know it can be a lot to read through, but just give it a shot.
Originally posted by Terapin
It is always interesting when Zionist supporters choose to point to Darfur when talking about genocide.