It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Griff
reply to post by jfj123
I don't understand why you are combining the two unrelated scenarios?
Other than to troll bait. As such, good day and good bye.
Originally posted by jfj123
Looks like you got caught making conflicting statements and now you are going in to hiding. Well good luck with reality avoidance
Originally posted by Sparky63
Question;
If it would have been so easy for a crew to work unnoticed for a period of time, what would have prevented the terrorists from placing the charges in the buildings?
Why do we automatically jump to the conclusion that it was the government who did so?
Originally posted by jfj123
So 1 page back, you were thinking a "TEAM" of "MUSLIM EXTREMISTS" were responsible.
Now you're saying that non-muslims must have rigged the buildings.
So which is it? Are you wrong in this post or the other one? OOPS Your bad???
And once again, big difference between 1 person and an entire team of muslim extremists.
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by bsbray11
So a building was built, completed and occupied and it had fatal structural flaws...hmmm.
I wonder if the WTC's had a similar problem which brought them down after the plane impacts and fires????
Originally posted by Griff
Please. Both you and Seymour are so transparent with this tactic, it isn't even laughable anymore.
Originally posted by Griff
The first speculation
The second speculation
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
It's a fact that not too long ago, you said that it was possible that if thermite was placed on the bracing floor beams below the impact floors, that this would make it easier to buckle columns. Then you said with just that the global collapse was possible/probable.
But NOW you seem to be argueing AGAINST global collapse if the columns buckle.
Do you understand why WE might think that this is just a tactic? Namely, switch your argument as the subject suits? It seems pretty transparent to me that this is the case, and that the claims of revisiting your position on these issues resulted in changing your mind is pretty transparent too. Cuz when pushed for a reason, you either can't give a the reason WHY you changed your mind - just that you did - or leave the thread.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
Originally posted by Griff
The first speculation
The second speculation
Yep.
This is the best evidence that the TM has.
Speculation.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by jfj123
Looks like you got caught making conflicting statements and now you are going in to hiding. Well good luck with reality avoidance
Show me the conflict and I may respond.
Originally posted by jfj123
Yes, I'm saying that if one person signed to have explosives installed in the 3 WTC's, the people installing said explosives would know they were installing explosives thus requiring that we add them to the supposed conspiracy.
What if those workers were fanatical Muslims? Would they still be (in your eyes) "added to the conspiracy"? Or would they be "part of the terror plot"?
You assume that this was accomplished by Americans with no other ties to any other countries. I can state that I don't believe any American would do this either. Too bad the world isn't made up of Americans.
Originally posted by jfj123
Again big difference between one person and an entire crew of people. Unless of course you think 1 person rigged all 3 buildings all by himself? or maybe with the help of a cousin?
Maybe that wasn't their job? Maybe their job was to make sure the elevators became in-operable? Or the sprinklers?
Point is: It's an example of middle eastern looking men having access to the towers and no one remembers them. You can argue with it all you want, but there it is.
Originally posted by Griff
And please jf and Seymour, don't give me the "but...but...steel was saved". That's horse kaka and you know it. Especially when WTC 7 is concerned.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by bsbray11
The reason you can get away with this sort of thing is quite simple.
Humans are under the impression that they cannot be deceived.
Just look how many "holier than thou" people reply in this thread alone. They have no idea what they are talking about, no experience of the incident, but apparently, they already know that there was nothing untoward goin on.
Reason is, as I was saying, apparently these people cannot be deceived. They ESPECIALLY cannot be deceived by their own race. They may admit to being deceived by people of another race/country/ideology, but that's because people who are different are inherently evil and practise deceiving all day long. Unlike politicians and TV reporters ..... especially if they are from the homeland. Only politicians and TV reporters from foreign countries deceive ...
And as long as most people continue to believe this, conspirators can continue getting away with their conspiracies. Maybe when the next attack comes, a few more people will question it as they did/are 911.
Originally posted by jfj123
Well according to the NIST, they did save steel for their investigation.
What evidence do you have to suggest this is not true? This seems a reasonable question since you've made an accusation.
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by Griff
I noticed you completely ignored my previous post.
You asked me to show you where you made your mistake and I showed you yet you pretend like it never happened.