It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Terapin
As the Occupiers, they are legally required to do that under international law. Perhaps you should read the Geneva conventions.
Hamas did not bite the hand that fed it, it bit that hand that oppresses them.
Zionism is racism.
Settlements: The Facts
There are currently 121 Israeli settlements and approximately 102 Israeli outposts built illegally on Pales-tinian land occupied by Israel in 1967. All of these settlements and outposts are illegal under international law and have been condemned by numerous United Nations Security Council resolutions. Israeli outposts are considered illegal under Israeli law.
These settlements and outposts are inhabited by a population of some 462,000 Israeli settlers. 191,000 Israelis are living in settlements around Jerusalem and a further 271,400 are further spread throughout the West Bank. The settler population has grown consistently between 4-6% per year over the last two decades, a much higher rate of growth than Israeli society as a whole (1.5%).
Approximately 385,000 settlers in 80 settlements will be located between the Separation Wall and the Green Line if Israel holds to projected plans.
In 2008, amidst the ‘settlement freeze’ agreed upon in the Annapolis framework, tenders for new settle-ment building increased by 550% from 2007. Actual settlement construction has increased by 30% since the launching of the new round of peace talks. Settlement building around Jerusalem has increased by a factor of 38.
A total of 9,000 further housing units have been approved in East Jerusalem, and approximately 2,600 new housing units are being built east of the Separation Wall, comprising 55% of all settlement construc-tion activity.
Settlements are built on less than 3 percent of the area of the West Bank. However, due to the extensive network of settler roads and restrictions on Palestinians accessing their own land, Israeli settlements domi-nate more than 40 percent of the West Bank.
Settlements and International Law
Israeli settlements are illegal under every basic reading of international law:
Article 46 of the Hague Convention prohibits confiscation of private property in occupied territory. Article 55 of the same Hague Convention stipulates “the occupying state shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct”.
Article 49, paragraph 6 of the Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly stipulates that “the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies”.
UN Security Council Resolution 465 (1980-unanimously adopted) made it clear that “Israel’s policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants” in the Occupied Territories constitutes “a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East”. The Security Council called upon Israel to “dismantle the existing settlements and in particular to cease, on an urgent ba-sis, the establishment, construction or planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem”.
The 2004 ruling of the International Court of Justice in The Hague declared that “Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, are illegal and an obstacle to peace and to eco-nomic and social development”.
Palestinian rocket attacks and Israeli air strikes threatened on Thursday to undermine efforts by President Barack Obama's Middle East envoy to reinforce a fragile Gaza ceasefire.
Palestinian militants in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip launched one rocket into Israel late on Wednesday -- the first since the January 18 ceasefire -- and another on Thursday. No one was hurt.
Israeli aircraft then struck in the southern Gaza Strip, attacking a metal workshop that the military called a weapons factory, causing no casualties, and a motorcycle, wounding two militants and 10 youths passing by, medical workers said.
Originally posted by Terapin
reply to post by Retseh
There continue to be a large number of Illegal settlements. Israel drew back from only few. Perhaps you should check again.
By International law as Occupiers, they are required to provide aid. Even the Israeli Supreme court agrees with this law.
Zionism is the plan to push out all Palestinians from their rightful land. That is racism.
For centuries in historic times, Arabs and Jews lived side by side in the area. The only reason that can not happen now is due to the illegal actions of Israel.
Remember, it was Israel who broke the recent ceasefire that led to the current military action against Gaza
Originally posted by deltaboy
www.liveleak.com...
Heres the video of the ambush of the IDF soldiers. You can tell its Mossad because of the shouting of Allah Akbar. Reall Islamic freedom fighters would never shout like that because that would give away their position. It would be Mossad that ambush their own and shout Allah Akbar to make the audience think it was Islamic freedom fighters.
Originally posted by Catfish
I'm going to get shot down over this, but I'm going to say it anyway.
For there to be peace over there, one of the belligerents will have to be wiped off the map, and Israel is the one holding the big guns.
There is more, but you can go educate yourself if you wish. While you are at it, educate yourself about the decision of the Israeli Supreme court over the matter. You will see the truth of my statement that they upheld these responsibilities.
[p.812] Paragraph 1 -- Duties of the Occupying power
2779 This paragraph supplements paragraph 1 of Article 55 of the fourth Convention, which imposes on the Occupying Power the obligation "of ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population" of the occupied territory. It sets out from the idea that it is too restrictive to limit this obligation to supplying the population of the occupied territory only with food and medical supplies. Thus mention is made here in addition of the provision of clothing, bedding, and means of shelter. In fact, it is quite possible to suffer, and even die, from heat or cold, and it is essential that the civilian population has adequate clothing, bedding and shelter. Urgent action to provide shelter applies particularly if the occupied territory has suffered damage from bombing.
Originally posted by Retseh
I stated..."Zionism is the plan to push out all Palestinians from their rightful land. That is racism."
You Replied "Now you're really confused. Even if what you are saying is true, and it isn't, it does not constitute racism, it is simply a form of imperialism, it isn't that Israel doesn't want Palestinians, it's more simply that they want what the Palestinians are sitting on, their land."
Remember, The UN mandate which help create Israel gave 48% of the land to the Palestinians, Israel has illegally Occupied all but 12%
Poll: 81% of Israelis want the land for Jews only.
The Zionist movement historically made a claim to territory on behalf of 'the Jewish people', an exclusive geopolitical claim. It claimed that individual Jews had a right to residence in that territory, which did not apply to randomly selected non-Jews outside that territory. None of the early Zionists advocated the ethnic cleansing, which in fact preceded the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 - but none of them believed that non-Jews had a right to the Jewish homeland either. Zionists attribute a superior quality to Jews, namely the exclusive right to the Jewish national territory....The State of Israel confers no right of residence or citizenship on persons born outside Israel, unless they have specific links to Israel, to the Jewish people, or to Judaism. That excludes about 99% of the world population.
53 years after being exiled from their homeland, in defiance of the four Geneva Conventions, UN Resolutions 181, 194, 242, 338, and others, and other multilateral and international human rights conventions, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the disinherited refugees of Palestine, continue to endure merciless punishment from the Zionist entity.
On January 27th media headlines trumpeted that Palestinians had broken the latest cease-fire: a bomb had killed one Israeli soldier and injured two or three.
Virtually every media outlet reported this action as a major breach in the ceasefire that had begun on January 18th: CNN, AP, NPR, the New York Times, The Washington Post, Fox News, ABC, CBS, the Christian Science Monitor, the LA Times, the McClatchy Newspapers, etc, all pinned the resumption of violence on Palestinians.
There’s just one problem. Israeli forces had already violated the ceasefire at least seven times:
Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer in Khuza'a east of Khan Yunis on Jan 18
Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer east of Jabalia on Jan. 19
Israeli naval gunboats shelled the Gaza coastline, causing damage to civilian structures.
Israeli troops shot and injured a child east of Gaza City on Jan 22
Israeli gunboat fire injured 7 Palestinian fishermen on Jan 22
Israeli shelling set a Palestinian house on fire on Jan 22
Israeli tanks fired on the border town of Al Faraheen, causing damage to homes and farms on Jan 24
Yet, Americans who rely on American media for their news on Israel-Palestine are being led to believe that Palestinians initiated the violence (the death of one Israeli soldier) that has now led to Israel’s latest onslaught.
Originally posted by Terapin
Back on topic.
There’s just one problem. Israeli forces had already violated the ceasefire at least seven times:
Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer in Khuza'a east of Khan Yunis on Jan 18
Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer east of Jabalia on Jan. 19
Israeli naval gunboats shelled the Gaza coastline, causing damage to civilian structures.
Israeli troops shot and injured a child east of Gaza City on Jan 22
Israeli gunboat fire injured 7 Palestinian fishermen on Jan 22
Israeli shelling set a Palestinian house on fire on Jan 22
Israeli tanks fired on the border town of Al Faraheen, causing damage to homes and farms on Jan 24
Yet, Americans who rely on American media for their news on Israel-Palestine are being led to believe that Palestinians initiated the violence (the death of one Israeli soldier) that has now led to Israel’s latest onslaught.
Top Israeli Cabinet ministers Wednesday set a series of tough conditions for accepting a proposed cease-fire with Hamas, saying there would be no deal until the Islamic militant group releases a captured Israeli soldier.
The unanimous decision by the 11-member Security Cabinet was likely to set back Egyptian efforts to broker a long-term truce in the wake of Israel's harsh military offensive in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip last month. Israel planned to dispatch a senior envoy to Cairo in the coming days.
....
Reopening the border is the top priority of the Hamas government. Speaking at his headquarters in Syria on Tuesday, Hamas' exiled leader, Khaled Mashaal, complained about Olmert's conditions.
"There can be no truce unless the (Gaza) blockade is lifted and the crossings are opened. The truce issue should not be linked to the issue of prisoner Schalit," he said Tuesday.