Adolf Hitler, Sisters Taken from Parents' Home

Adolf Hitler, Sisters Taken from Parents' Home

www.nbcphiladelphia.com

Adolf and his two sisters -- one-year-old JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and 8-month-old Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell -- were removed from their parents’ home Tuesday night by the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, Holland Township police chief David Van Gilson told LehighValleyLive.com.

It is unclear why the children were removed from their parent’s home. Gilson said his department did not receive any reports of abuse or negligence.

(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread420114/pg1

Naming a child Adolf Hitler does not constitue taking away all your children - though it is a weird name for a child.

Naming a child Adolf Hitler is strange and sets the child up for abuse from others in life, so the parents did not do right in that respect.

A simple request for a name on a three year old's birthday cake has caused a controversy because of the person who he is named after.

3-Year-Old "Adolf Hitler" Causes Cake Mess

Watch VideoSome people aren't so sweet on the icing policy that was in place at Wal-Mart after the bakery at a Pa. store put the name Adolf Hitler on a birthday...

Wal-Mart Taking Heat for "Adolf Hitler" Cake

He’s the little boy whose name was the center of an international firestorm last December after a Greenwich, N.J. supermarket refused to write his name on a birthday cake. The store said it was inappropriate and refused to give an apology after the parents demanded one.

But to then take the children away, based on the name that was chosen for a child is completely WRONG!

It is a matter of free speech - look at some of the very weird names out there, examples:

Rumor: Demi Moores child -
Track - Trig - etc. - Sarah Palin's children

There are many other names, including latin's who name their kids: Jesus - all the time.

What has happened to our freedom of choice.

What is next - a bill from Congress stating names we are not allowed to use for our children?

I would never name my child Adolf Hitler, Osama, Napoleon, etc. But just because I don't think those are appropriate names, doesn't mean people who do name their kids those - should then have their children taken away, just for that reason.

What is happening here?

They had NO right what so ever to take the children away from the parents!

If the name gives them the right - what else will start giving the govt. the right to take our kids?

Don't think - this is not serious - to me - it is!

Do you think, it is okay for the govt. to take children - based on the name given a child?

www.nbcphiladelphia.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 14-1-2009 by questioningall]

In the land of the free eh??
This is just an example of how free Americans are.
Freedom of speech???
Land of the free???
As nuts as it may be to name a kid adolph hitler,its even more nuts telling people what they should do and what to name their kids.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by DrumsRfun]

Just shows you the maturity level of society as a whole.

As you had pointed out if the name you chose for your child could be taken as a form of child abuse ... then we have quite a few celebrities to lock up.

Gwyneth Paltrow comes to mind... she named her kids Moses and Apple
or Frank Zappa's kids Moon Unit, Dweezil, Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and Diva Thin Muffin Pigeene.

Now you could say that is miles a part from naming a kid after a notorious world famous figure, but again where do we draw the line? Allow the state to dictate to us what appropriate names are? And as far as the bithday cake goes, if you are a paying customer you should be able to have written whatever you wanted on it, it is your cake and it is america after all or did we loose our fundamental right to freedom speech?

Besides even those who have been branded by history as monsters... not any different then the very worst of us nobodies, we all have some good qualities, but that is beside the point. Unfortunately for some kids, they are given names that give society a free-pass to haunt them with, but usually in such cases when the kid is old enough they will initiate a name change or it will just occur naturally socially, going by a nick name or variation of their birth name.

ie Addy the Hitman... sounds like a jewish mobster...
and depending on your research Hitler closely fit that bill

reply to post by DrumsRfun


Exactly, I do not think it was wise for the parents to name their child that, in fact it is down right strange and weird, BUT the govt. does not have any right to take children away from the parents, based on a name.

We have lost our freedom of choice in our own non violent and simple family matters, once that begins to happen.

Originally posted by The All Seeing I...if the name you chose for your child could be taken as a form of child abuse ... then we have quite a few celebrities to lock up.

Gwyneth Paltrow comes to mind... she named her kids Moses and Apple
or Frank Zappa's kids Moon Unit, Dweezil, Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and Diva Thin Muffin Pigeene.

I beg to disagree. It's one thing for a parent to offer up a ridiculous name...Zappa's kids are a fine example. But they are blessed with living with unorthodox parents, and can always assume a nickname. I'm sure Zowie Bowie had occasion to say "Yes, well, my Da's the Thin White Duke." and others would respond "Well, of course, then."

Naming a kid Adolph Hitler is child abuse because it not only fixes a kid up with one of the most despised names in history, but it also adds the foot note: "Oh, by the way, my parents are total White Trash in every sense of the concept." Which makes it even more abusive. Children should not be subject to derision, and if their parents do so...in this singular mannner... they are harming the children and are shouting out that they are not fit to parent them.

I'd like to know the reason behind the removal of the children. I bet it will come down to the family being White Supremists and teaching their children anti-semantic beliefs.

Giving you kid a weird name is the "cool" thing to do these days. Not even just for celebrities. And with the mixing of cultures pretty much all over we see a lot of "ethnic" names that we might see as odd but are perfectly normal for that culture, I once knew a guy named "Phuc" but pronounced Foo.

I do agree that that naming you kid Adolph Hitler and the other one Aryan Nation is abuse and I don't understand why the department that processes birth certificates allowed it.

reply to post by JohnnyCanuck



Okay, so now naming a child that others feel is inapropriate is now a form of child abuse?

Sorry, though I adamently disagree with the child's name, I also feel that parents should not have their children taken away, based on the name of a child!

That is extreme "big brother" now saying we will take your children away, not just for violence and neglect - but now for how you name the child.

makes me think of a low friction incline.

they start by banning the name adolf hitler and teaching your kids that white people are the best, it all seems fine. They ban people from teaching kids about activism and terrorism , it all goes unnoticed. They ban people from teaching kids about freedom -it's too late.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by NatureBoy]

Lots of Chinese guys named Mau. He killed more then hitler.

Lots of people named Lenin.....he made Hitler look like a schoolboy.

Why not let the truth be known about Hitler?

reply to post by questioningall

But to then take the children away, based on the name that was chosen for a child is completely WRONG!

It is unclear why the children were removed from their parent’s home.

We do not know why they were taken away. The cop being interviewed received no calls of abuse, etc. But we do not know if the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services received any calls. They may have.

I think we have to wait for follow up to see why this happened. The parents arent even talking to anyone regarding this. This leads me to believe they are guilty of something. They had NO issues telling the world about their kid not getting a cake due to the name - so if they were taken away due to the names (I doubt it) why wouldnt they be screaming to the world now for such a ridiuclous reason?

Still much to find out about this.

But thanks for bringing to our attention


[edit on 1/14/2009 by greeneyedleo]

I had a girlfriend from Berlin Germany and she told me that in Germany, you had to give your children names that were approved by the Government. Apparently they have a book of names that can be used.

What would they do if they named their kid This Oppressive Government?
Now that would make a good courtcase!!

[edit on 14-1-2009 by DrumsRfun]

I am guessing that they see naming a child with that name "IS" child abuse.

Kinda makes you wonder what parents would name their child with that name.

Perhaps they feel if they are willing to do that, what else are they willing to do.

Gil,

You make a very good point.

They did openly complain to the news about the birthday cake issue.

Why are they not screaming out loud if their children were removed based only on the child's name.

I also think their is far more going on than we have been told,

[edit on 1/14/2009 by mrmonsoon]

reply to post by mrmonsoon



There are other people named Adolf Hitler in the world - so I wonder if I named a child:

War criminal Bush
Freedom for Gaza
Stop all wars
Freemasons worship Satan
911 inside job

the list goes on and on.

So if I named a child any of the above, would that give the govt. a right to take my child away?

I agree with Greeneyedleo.

There is more to this that will come out. For the parents to use the children to make their political statement, of sorts, is wrong. These children will live with their parents stupidity for their entire lives, even if they change their names.

Originally posted by questioningall
reply to post by mrmonsoon

 

There are other people named Adolf Hitler in the world - so I wonder if I named a child:

War criminal Bush
Freedom for Gaza
Stop all wars
Freemasons worship Satan
911 inside job

the list goes on and on.

So if I named a child any of the above, would that give the govt. a right to take my child away?

As far as I know, you can name your child whatever you want here in the states. There is nothing in the article that leads me to believe the name of the child is the reason they were taken away. Nobody knows yet. Only assumptions can be made.

Can you find any other cases where kids were taken away due to the name given to them? If not, im sure you are quite safe in naming your child whatever you want.

They look like a fine example of genetics in general. A worthy example of their cause.

Poor kids. Their parents are self-serving dip#s, and because of it their lives are turned upside down.

Originally posted by NatureBoy
they start by banning the name adolf hitler and teaching your kids that white people are the best, it all seems fine. They ban people from teaching kids about activism and terrorism , it all goes unnoticed. They ban people from teaching kids about freedom -it's too late.

The obvious point has been made by Jackinthebox...why were they allowed to register those names in the first place?

However, I have seen some examples of child abuse hit the media of late, where the state was aware of something hinky going on, but was reluctant to make a move. The results were varying degrees of tragedy which in retrospect, had been telegraphed. That being said, where there are indications of parental neglect for the welfare of the child, the state should act first and ask questions later.

Personally, in a case where children are given names that obviously indicate parents with a high degree of stupidity over and above those normally associated with white supremacists...these are people that could see themselves going down in flames 'for the sake of the race'...they should be made to account for themselves.

They've fired the first salvo in naming the kids as they did. That is obviously not for the edification of the kids, nor is it of an endearing nature. It's rubbing somebody's nose in apparent 1'st Amendment Rights, and now being trumped by the childrens' rights.

From the info presented here, it's a good call. Let's see how it plays out.

reply to post by JohnnyCanuck

why were they allowed to register those names in the first place?

Because there is no law stating what you can and can not name your child. At least not one that I have found yet. I am looking

If a law is passed to say what you can and can not name your child, then there would be a thread on how the government has not right to tell us out to name our children