It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by darkelf
reply to post by K J Gunderson
I have been reading and studying the Bible for years. Although it was written by a number of different people, there is a continuous thread that runs through it. If you don't know the back story, you might not understand the random story you are reading.
That is just silly double talk. If you have read even a little bit of the bible, you know it in no way shares structure or form with a coherent novel. It has contradictory stories as well as multiple versions of the same events. Chapters end with no correlation to where the next begins. It is not a novel.
I do not disagree reading the entire book helps but it is still not one cohesive story. Sorry but it is not. You cannot demonstrate or even argue that it is so please do not use false analogies. The only thing worse than a blind zealot is ANY religious person that uses distortion to get me closer to their god.
I have read the bible. You are not going to talk down to me as some ignorant plebe and expect me to humble take your word. I read it. It is not a novel. Trying to use it as such in an analogy is a poor attempt. There is not one singular thread that runs through the entire book, there are many. You just really like one.
Originally posted by darkelf
Chapters and verses are only there to facilitate the location of sentences. Many of the chapters are placed in very awkward locations and do nothing for continuity.
Contradictory stories and multiple versions are just different points of view.
The four Gospels, for example, are basically the same story from different men. God did not write these stories, man did. But I believe they were inspired by God to write them.
I am neither a blind zealot nor religious.
It is not my place to get you closer to God. That is your choice and yours alone. I am simply trying to explain how to understand the Bible. It is one of the most interesting books I've ever read and I still enjoy studying it. I discover something each time I read it.
I never intended to come across as talking down to anyone.
I am trying to give people a differnt take on the Bible. It is the story of God. He is the main character. It starts out telling how God created the material world and mankind. It ends telling how God will judge everyone to His standards. The stuff in the middle gives me insight to God's character. I cannot begin to fathom how a loving merciful God can kill those you call innocents without understanding the nature of God and what the death of innocents actually means to Him.
I appologise if I came off as condescending. That was not my intent.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by darkelf
Contradictory stories and multiple versions are just different points of view.
You see that comparable to a novel? How?
The four Gospels, for example, are basically the same story from different men. God did not write these stories, man did. But I believe they were inspired by God to write them.
Right, God inspired them all differently? That makes little sense to me if it is perfect. Why would God inspire one man to see things one way, another to see them another way, and then tell them to get along?
Anyway, that is my point. That is FOUR DIFFERENT BOOKS. Four different books does not a novel make.
I am neither a blind zealot nor religious.
You are obviously one and at least a little of the other. You are here talking about your god. That is religious. Sorry, but it is. You are insisting that four different books by four different people in a collection is the same thing as one cohesive narrative. It is not. That makes me think you suffer some blindness. I honestly did not think either was an insult. If you are not religious, then you must not be talking about your religion here. Seems you are. If you are not a blind zealot, then surely you can see how stating that different books, by different authors, with no cohesive narrative - are not the same thing as a novel with a beginning, middle, and end.
It is not my place to get you closer to God. That is your choice and yours alone. I am simply trying to explain how to understand the Bible. It is one of the most interesting books I've ever read and I still enjoy studying it. I discover something each time I read it.
Why try to get me to believe as you do about this religious book then? If you were simply trying to explain things away with facts, then I would see your point. What I see is someone distorting reality to make a point. What point? Not sure but it is one that has to do with me understanding how YOU SEE your bible more and not really the bible more.
I never intended to come across as talking down to anyone.
Forgive me. That was harshly put. It was not the first time I saw you state that if someone read the bible they would get it. This goes on the assumption that any of us would be here, having this discussion without first studying for the test. I just find that presumptuous but that is me and I do apologize for how that was put.
I am trying to give people a differnt take on the Bible. It is the story of God. He is the main character. It starts out telling how God created the material world and mankind. It ends telling how God will judge everyone to His standards. The stuff in the middle gives me insight to God's character. I cannot begin to fathom how a loving merciful God can kill those you call innocents without understanding the nature of God and what the death of innocents actually means to Him.
I have never asked that question. I skipped that one so I need to understand something else. I need to understand how proponents of the bible can just say things and feel ok with that, no matter how untrue or far from reality they may be.
Case in point: You saying the bible is like a novel and therefore needs to be read from beginning to end in order to be understood at all, in any part.
I would dare say you need to tell every priest that ever held mass that I was present for because they seemed to think that this collection of stories could be broken down into little lessons that have a beginning, middle, and end all within the vast collection of fairy tales that is the bible.
It is not one long story by one mind. It is a collection of indirect collaboration. BIG DIFFERENCE.
Originally posted by darkelf
Do you remember the movie Vantage Point? I have read a few novels in the past that are similar to that movie. By telling the story form different points of view, you get a fuller though often contradictory view.
I didn’t say that God inspired them differently. I said God inspired them. They each wrote according to their point of view. No two people will see an event the exact same way. Their past experiences and knowledge will always color how they interpret what they saw.
I never said that the Bible was a novel, but that it could be approached like a novel. I gave the example of The Wheel of Time series. The Bible can be approached as a series of novels. The same rules still apply. For me, I can read any single book of the Bible and understand why certain things happen because I have read the previous books.
It’s all about perspective. I don’t consider myself a blind zealot or religious because I don’t believe in institutionalized religion. I didn’t take offense; I just don’t see myself that way. I believe that a person’s belief in God is between them and God and should not be used as a tool of control. I believe there is a difference between being a spiritual person and being a religious person. I am here talking about my God because that just happens to be the topic of this thread.
My suggestion at a different approach to the Bible is in no way to make a point or try to make someone see the Bible the same way I do. As a tutor, I had to know different learning styles. Not everyone learns the same way and I often had to use different styles until I discovered which one worked best for that particular student. The novel approach is a learning style that works for some and not for others. It is just a different approach to the Bible. I don’t need anyone to understand how I see the Bible. I gave this example as a way to help someone else experience the Bible.
Originally posted by darkelf
I don’t think it is presumptuous to make that claim.
The Bible is not an easy read and too many people get on here and want to argue scripture that when taken out of context mean nothing. I’ve been reading and studying it many years and I still find where I misunderstood something. I probably come off passionate about the Bible because I enjoy it so much. I am always willing to listen though, and by no means believe that my take is always the correct one.
The novel concept is not something I came up with. It was taught to me by my mom who knew I did not learn things the same way as most people. When I was a kid and went to church, our pastor would pull one of those stories to give us the lesson. First he would read the scripture that related to that story. Then he would give us the back story as to how and why the people involved were where they were. He often explained customs and laws of the time. I guess that’s why Baptist services lasted so long.
I agree with you that it is not one long story by one mind. It is one long story by many men who wrote because they were inspired by God.
I suppose it could be seen as a collection of indirect collaboration.
But when I see Daniel calculating the days left of captivity from the prophet Ezekiel, I have to feel that maybe they’re not so indirect after all.
Originally posted by darkelf
How can you determine if it is the Word of God or the word of man without a thorough indepth study of the Bible? Have you read the Bibile from cover to caover? Have you studied the Bible in depth?
Originally posted by darkelf
Which is why I suggested the Strong's Concordance. Much of the descrepancies have to do with improper translation.
Originally posted by darkelf
Chapters and verses are only there to facilitate the location of sentences. Many of the chapters are placed in very awkward locations and do nothing for continuity. Contradictory stories and multiple versions are just different points of view. The four Gospels, for example, are basically the same story from different men.
Originally posted by darkelf
I didn’t say that God inspired them differently. I said God inspired them. They each wrote according to their point of view. No two people will see an event the exact same way.
Originally posted by darkelf
I agree with you that it is not one long story by one mind. It is one long story by many men who wrote because they were inspired by God.
Originally posted by SwissPort905v2
Gods word. Those that can't decode the bible, are the ones that dont believe in 2012
Gods word. Those that can't decode the bible, are the ones that dont believe in 2012
In what way does the fact that its authors were total screw ups help your case? Besides the fact that Moses most certainly did NOT write the books attributed to him the idea that the writers were sinful just hurts your case as they are then flawed enough to screw up while writing the Bible.
Fail.
Biblical prophecies fail on every level. They are vague and open to wildly different interpretations and many of them aren't even prophecies and are taken out of context and used as prophecy by modern apologists and zealots. Fail.
“Thoughts and pictures come to my mind, . . . thoughts from the years before 1914 when there was real peace, quiet and security on this earth—a time when we didn’t know fear. . . . Security and quiet have disappeared from the lives of men since 1914.”
For much of humankind this is what is happening. And it is not simply because of the ever-present threat of nuclear warfare. People also fear crime, pollution, disease, inflation and many other things that threaten their security and their very lives.
“We will eat fear, sleep fear, live in fear and die in fear.”
Failed indeed to know the writers – what sort of men were they and the lessons we can learn from them – their successes and failures.
Can you name a book that can do that?
Before 1914 – there was abundance of food on earth
Sadly food shortages are not due to lack of food
Can you point to a time where this happened and still happening? The facts are in front of us.
ATS has some great statistics of earthquakes which confirms the fact that since 1914 earthquakes around the world are ever increasing in great number with great intensity and magnitude.
Why even mothers who have natural love towards their own children are murdering their own.
That fear is probably the biggest single emotion in people’s lives today.
It is not for those serving Jehovah God and His designated King of kings – the Lord Jesus Christ
As for the criticalness of our time – since 1914 the world is now facing a global economic hardship – if not a collapse, even a prediction of a third depression by some economist
This is self explanatory and the evidence is super abundant! This website alone is just one of the many proofs of this prophecy!
The U.N. will play a major role on this one. In the coming ‘days’ we will see a “cry” of/for “Peace and Security”.
Question to you: Are we living in that “Last Days” or not? Or is it still far off or was the prophecy referring to the past as some critics loved to point out?
Question: Can you show me a Book that is able predict the future with pinpoint accuracy