It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
Do you have any thoughts on "Revelation Chapter 14. Verse 3.? I would love to know your interpretation of this verse regarding....
"They sang as it were a new song before the throne, before the four Living Creatures,....... "
Peace...
Originally posted by justamomma
Originally posted by WhamBamTYM
I doubt I originated this concept, but I believe someone (or a group of someones) noted the prophecies of the Messiah's arrival and custom-crafted Jesus to fulfull that role. The objective was to give lawless, destructive mankind a moral framework and hope for the afterlife. And I wouldn't be surprised if this being (or group of beings) had large almond eyes!
LoL! Well, I do not know if you are kidding about the last part considering all the BS I have seen on this board... but doubtless you are correct that Jesus was tailor made to fit the role.
The reason I could never settle on that belief was, if I were to do such, how would I know that *this* time it was real considering the concept that is brought forth of Jesus was not new.
Having said that though, I do believe the Word was spoken by whomever wrote the story of Jesus. It was G.d's way of picking the snake (deception) up by the tail and turning it back into a staff (the law) for those who are paying attention and not given to man's mythologies. I find the whole of the TAnakh and how the deception was used against those doing the deceiving to be BRILLIANT beyond human intelligence.
[edit on 26-1-2009 by justamomma]
Originally posted by justamomma
This is in DIRECT contradiction to what G-d laid out for Israel. How cruel is that to lay out that Israel must be observant of the Sabbath day over and over, (punishable BY death for non compliance), turn around and send a man who not only thumbs his nose at this ordinance but also says that now the Father is thumbing his nose at it (though G-d had NOT said that he had changed His mind on this command) and expect all to believe this man who is contradicting what they had been told or they would be eternally damned! It makes NO sense and it is a farce. If it is NOT a farce, then there is REASON to be afraid because there is a game being played with man. It also goes to show you that Paul really MEANT “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness.”
Originally posted by justamomma
Honestly, I understand the prophets of the Tanakh much more clearly than I do the speaker of Revelations.
With the prophets, I can easily point to whom is being spoken of. I never thought I would, but I can. The research I have done on these prophets prophecies points to their writings to be talking about now and not then as many think.
It is clear to me, since these prophecies were said to be sealed until the end, that now considering the seals have clearly been broken, that we are at the end!
Originally posted by justamomma
reply to post by CJaKfOrEsT
Jesus never once though said he was the end of the Law... that was Paul. He said he came to fulfill it.. big difference.
And also, it should be noted.. he did not say "I come to fulfill the law for all of you." Nope.. that is adding words to the Word that spoke from his mouth.
He was merely a vessel in which the Word could use to show the example to us all. That was it. And thanks to Paul, now people worship the man rather than follow the example that was set.
Originally posted by justamomma
Originally posted by CJaKfOrEsT
Friend, you meantion the Torah, but do you keep the opening statements of Leviticus? Leviticus 1:1-4
1 And the LORD called unto Moses, and spake unto him out of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying,
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man of you bring an offering unto the LORD, ye shall bring your offering of the cattle, even of the herd, and of the flock.
3 If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male without blemish: he shall offer it of his own voluntary will at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation before the LORD.
4 And he shall put his hand upon the head of the burnt offering; and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him.
I *can't* do that... you know why? Because Paul made sure that I couldn't along with the help of those who built the dome of the rock. This is spoken of all throughout the Tanakh and the ironic part is, you all say that sacrifices are over once and for all because of the barbaric human sacrifice.
The Tanakh clearly states that it is not. However, this is not to the true saints downfall and G.d speaks of why it is not. Because *we* having understood the voice of our Father and in following after His teachings/His ways/His path, are able to offer up our prayers as an offering to Him until He restores the temple and the way He had things set up.
He didn't desire the sacrifices, but He desired our understanding. Thus, He allowed for the sacrifices and offerings to cease for a time until His children FINALLY realized what it was they were missing.. aka, the right heart and the right understanding.
They will resume though. It has already been laid out as such. The fight that will take place according to revelations is actually against the Father's will.. It is deception against G.d's will.
[edit on 25-1-2009 by justamomma]
Originally posted by badmedia
reply to post by Christ!
Are you not still talking about separation when you talk about this world be separate? Is it not to separate yourself from this world?
To say yes to 1 instance of existence is to say yes to all of existence.
Originally posted by badmedia
Well I don't usually find myself in disagreement with you as far as how it is. Where we have disagreements is in purpose and reasons for it.
I see it more in terms of consciousness and thought. Where god and our true selves are consciousness, and the universe is the thought.
You can't find the thinker in the thought, and people who look for themselves in the thought I don't think will find themselves. When they do look inside and see the truth, and see that separation is an illusion, then I think after that point it is about using that information and applying it to the thought.
Meaning, I find purpose in the separation, even though I realize the separation is nothing more than perception.
In essence, it seems that it's a matter of "to be, or not to be".
Originally posted by badmedia
But, you are still actually seeking separation. You are still seeing yourself today as being separated. I do not see myself as separated.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
Good book suggestion to fit in with this thread "Paul The Mythmaker and the invention of Christianity" it's by a Talmudic scholar and quite good.
Originally posted by badmedia
Well I don't usually find myself in disagreement with you as far as how it is. Where we have disagreements is in purpose and reasons for it.
Originally posted by Simplynoone
How will you know whether you have THE TRUTH or not .if you have nothing to compare what you think you know to what the real truth is ? ..in this world that is full of so many different ways and versions etc ...Unless you first know the truth (which are in the scriptures ..ALL OF THEM ...both OT and NT ) ..............
[edit on 23-1-2009 by Simplynoone]
Originally posted by Christ!
What the chief priests were to Israel is what Paul and friends were to Gentile brand Judaism [judeo-christianity]. Instead of animal sacrifices, one sacrificial Messiah.
Originally posted by Simplynoone
It may take forever to even find the one road that is the way ................without a roadmap ..
Or will just stop and ask others for directions when you get lost ?
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
Good book suggestion to fit in with this thread "Paul The Mythmaker and the invention of Christianity" it's by a Talmudic scholar and quite good.