New video of all three towers

reply to post by tide88


I suggest you look at the nuremburg trials and see that propagandists were tried.....

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
reply to post by tide88

 

I suggest you look at the nuremburg trials and see that propagandists were tried.....

OMG, you cant be serious. Well guess this conversation is done. Forget to take you meds today?

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
a reminder to all federal conspiracy theorists. that are KNOWINGLY supporting a false version of events.. You will be prosecuted for aiding and abetting war criminals and for treason.. It may be next year or it may be 20 years.. it will happen.

[edit on 2-1-2009 by thefreepatriot]

yeah i am sure they are taking note on ats. If they are you are in for some serious prison time. Comparing the two is absolutly rediculous.

I supposed just because somthing comes out of "official"goverment press you will beleive it right? but if it comes from professional citizens you ignore it...the funny thing is that post was directed to people who are KNOWINGLY spreading disinfo.. if you are not knowingly spreading it.. then you should not have to worry..

reply to post by tide88


looks like you are really worried about that post lol.. it really affected you lol

interesting because it was only directly at people that are knowingly spreading disinfo...

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
reply to post by tide88

 

looks like you are really worried about that post lol.. it really affected you lol

omg. I am soo scared. I am currently trying to erase all my post on this board. What a joke.

reply to post by tide88


looks like you are scared by pretending your not shows me you are...

[edit on 2-1-2009 by thefreepatriot]

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
interesting because it was only directly at people that are knowingly spreading disinfo...

If you are rightt. You should be really worried right now. It is obvious you are purposely spreading disinfo. Especially saying the empire state building collision and the twin towers were similar. That is blatant disinfo. And you other argument have been disproven for years. Yet you still post it. Uh oh. You are in some serious trouble...

looks like you are scared by pretending your not shows me you are...

Is this Ultima1 posting under a different name? Bye.

Greys Filmed Through Ufo Porthole\Window?????!!!

Whew... At least I know who I was having a debate with.

[edit on 2-1-2009 by tide88]

reply to post by tide88


I am really sorry that post really affected you the way it did.... and who the heck is ultima1 lol I guess other people have said this too you in the past : bye

[edit on 2-1-2009 by thefreepatriot]

tide88 and thefreepatriot:

Not trying to tell you both what to do, but can you please take up the rest of your conversation to U2U.

Please have respect for the OP and the rest of us and try to stay on topic.

reply to post by tide88


That last edit was off topic.. mods take note of that..

reply to post by TARBOX


you are right tarbox... my apologies to the op

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
reply to post by tide88

 

I am really sorry that post really affected you the way it did.... and who the heck is ultima1 lol I guess other people have said this too you in the past

: bye

[edit on 2-1-2009 by thefreepatriot]

The only thing that affects me is how gulliable and uninformed people can be. Oh did I forget delusional. Got to go spread more propagada. Only have 20 years left of freedom. Watch out for the Greys!

Originally posted by TARBOX
tide88 and thefreepatriot:

Not trying to tell you both what to do, but can you please take up the rest of your conversation to U2U.

Please have respect for the OP and the rest of us and try to stay on topic.

Sorry tarbox. Got a little side tracked. Wont happen again.

reply to post by tide88


lol this is ATS in case you haven't noticed....

reply to post by TARBOX


One of the greatest misconceptions about that day is that the structural steel melted. It did not have to melt to fail. Steel will lose its structural strength at a much lower temperature than its melting point. A temperature that was well within the temps of the fires that day, and when you add the drastically increased stress that the beams were under due to the severing of so many other supports.............

Originally posted by tide88

Originally posted by thefreepatriot
reply to post by tide88

 

I am really sorry that post really affected you the way it did.... and who the heck is ultima1 lol I guess other people have said this too you in the past

: bye

[edit on 2-1-2009 by thefreepatriot]

The only thing that affects me is how gulliable and uninformed people can be. Oh did I forget delusional. Got to go spread more propagada. Only have 20 years left of freedom.

Watch out for the Greys!

The same applies to you as well.. it is amazing how gullable(correct spelling) and uniformed people are ...

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999


what about the structure below the impact zone.. it was still intact... there SHOULD have been resistance to the collapse from the impact area.. Regardless most of the jet fuel exploded in that huge fireball...

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by TARBOX

 

One of the greatest misconceptions about that day is that the structural steel melted. It did not have to melt to fail. Steel will lose its structural strength at a much lower temperature than its melting point. A temperature that was well within the temps of the fires that day, and when you add the drastically increased stress that the beams were under due to the severing of so many other supports.............

Yes, I understand that. The question I had for you was the temp you stated. 1832 degrees F was what NIST said the highest temp was. You said 3000. I was just wondering where you got the 3000 degrees from.....that's all.