It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Oh, and the people of England, Spain, Poland, etc., etc., etc., weren't?
Racist? How is stating a historical truth racist? Jews have been kicked out of every country they have ever lived in.
The question is WHY?
After all, if I go live with neighbors, and they kick me out, so I go live with other neighbors, and they kick me out too, how many times does that cycle have to repeat before everyone gets to go "Hey, maybe those neighbors had a point."?
What were the historical REASONS the people of the host country gave for kicking them out?
Originally posted by John Matrix
That is your subjective take on the past. I feel more sorry for the people that believe your racist remarks than I do for you.
Originally posted by breakingdradles
Originally posted by John Matrix
That is your subjective take on the past. I feel more sorry for the people that believe your racist remarks than I do for you.
Answer that question, why has almost every civilization throughout time at some point kicked out all those of the jewish faith?? From the romans to the russia, to england, to spain. Why would all of these countries kick a certain group out???
And I believe it was a minority of jews who committed acts to get the majority of jews kicked out, but they were bad enough to kick the whole group of people out.
Why??????
Originally posted by masonwatcher
reply to post by Mdv2
yet audiences like us sanctimoniously talk about non-violence. In that case how does one deal with genocide? Die quietly while on the high horse of non-violence?
[edit on 073131p://am3106 by masonwatcher]
Originally posted by Jacob08
Chicken or the egg? Which one has to come first if there is to be a peace both sides can live with
If you don't get what I'm saying. One person is saying they act the way they do because of the way they are treated. While the other says they are treated the way they are because of the way they act. If you still don't get it don't worry... it probably doesn't make sense.
[edit on 28-12-2008 by Jacob08]
Originally posted by Harlequin
i would like to remind some member of the massacre at wounded knee in 1890 , when US troops walked in to a siouz reservation and killed 350 men , women and children.
just 1 account in a long and bloody slaughter of the indiginous indian peoples.
[edit on 28/12/08 by Harlequin]
Originally posted by mybigunit
Question how many Palestinian or Muslim news agencies do you know of here in the US? Name one please. Then name me the Jewish owned and ran news agencies here in the US. The fact is its kind of hard to get their propaganda out if they own no news agency isnt it? Its easy for the Israelis to get their propaganda out because all the news agencies are owned by Jews.
Sigh....sheeple....
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by pause4thought
tHE REASON IS THIRD PARTIES ARE BIASED AND WON'T BE ACCEPTED BY BOTH SIDES.
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by pause4thought
Remember the UN post that freely allowed the Hezbolla to setup rocklet launchers right next to them, and fire them.....um...thats not helpping both sides, it is an attempt to shield one side while accusing the other.
The UN they cried like babies when the site that launched rockets was hit and they were injured.
So don't play the "your judging me" card when someone simply evaluates what you said.