India threatens Pakistan with deadline for WAR

I just pulled this from the India news dated Dec 25
timesofindia.indiatimes.com...
and also this out of the UK:
www.usnews.com...

Do you guys think this will happen????

wow.... I root for pakistan.

Did you know it will affect us all in some way. Like the food chane and notice alot of people will die. The more we kill people the less workforce their is.

Originally posted by infinite
Forward deployment of Pak Air Force planes detected

This "so called deadline" is non-existent - I've been looking for the statement, Indian is refusing to rule out specific options but does not want a full scale war.

India is not gona war Pakistan.Pakistan is a country with over a 100 nuclear warheads in it's arsenal and will use them if needed.

US wanted pakistan to handover people like General hamid Gul who created the taliban and Dr AQ Khan who was involved in delivering Nuclear tech to rugged nations like North Korea,Libya and Iran in the black market.But Pakistan put it's finger up to US and said 'we will never betray our heroes'.

The point i am tryna make is, once a country has Nukes than it kinda guarantees its safety 99.9% from its enemies.

Pakistan also has full backing off it's very close ally called China.Without China pakistan would have never been able to build its own nukes,missiles and air force infrastructures.

Yes and China also has ships in the region as well as the UK, US, etc.........
Do you think they will all play nice?

reply to post by theresult


By looking at your posts the only conclusion I can make is that you are not very educated. I look at your grammar and spelling. You obviously lack a third grade knowledge of proper English. There is such a thing as "spell checker" and don't give this crap about "texting" abbreviations. Not every one on this planet knows what they mean. But I'm certain nobody will have problems reading and understanding my post.

Taken from an Indian news source

India signed a landmark civilian nuclear cooperation deal with the United States earlier this year and might hope its growing political ties with Washington would get a further boost if it hit militant targets inside Pakistan with missiles and fighter jets.

We all know there are military sites that the US will want knocked out that are in Pakistan, and India wants to boost there relations.

But experts say the war is highly unlikely and also:

With India struggling to recover from the effects of a global economic meltdown, a war could mean a disaster for the country which, according to economic think tanks, would have to spend an estimated $3 billion on troop movements alone. There would be an immediate effect on trade, with sea and air routes disrupted. On the other hand, the manufacturing industry would gain as demand for war hardware would increase, providing more employment opportunities.

Originally posted by MikeboydUS
India should really wait till we complete our military build up in Afghanistan and Pakistan really needs stop pretending they have full control of "their" country. If they want to fight over land they can barely even control so be it. The smarter thing would be to be open to outside help. Their Pride will be their Fall.

It seems there is no other way to rid the world of terrorists, so I agree. Get the troops in Afghanistan first. Then they would be able to get the terrorists as they leave Pakistan like rats fleeing from a sinking ship.

Originally posted by Muundoggie
reply to post by theresult

 

By looking at your posts the only conclusion I can make is that you are not very educated. I look at your grammar and spelling. You obviously lack a third grade knowledge of proper English. There is such a thing as "spell checker" and don't give this crap about "texting" abbreviations. Not every one on this planet knows what they mean. But I'm certain nobody will have problems reading and understanding my post.

Don't let such trivial matters bother you. The human mind is marvelous at getting the meaning regardless of the spelling.

As far as Internet acronyms go, you can Google them and find out their meaning. The inhabitants of cyberspace are re-inventing how we communicate, which includes re-inventing our language.

If I can be of any help, let me know.

Resistance is futile.

JOHN

"It seems there is no other way to rid the world of terrorists, so I agree. Get the troops in Afghanistan first. Then they would be able to get the terrorists as they leave Pakistan like rats fleeing from a sinking ship."

Is that not a contradiction, how can you get the terrorists if they are fleeing Pakistan and what proof s have been provided to say terrorist are in Pakistan, proof from lying and corrupt Governments who have a vested interest to wage war for profit and power. Can these people be trusted, in my eyes no, they lied about Iraq are they now lying about Pakistan.

This (if true) can get pretty messy. Maybe Osama will poke his little head up in the midst of this and I can get a clear shot at him....I will not miss...

Yes you will, because you're a crap shot.

And Osama is probably dead. So prehaps you might be able to shoot him, what with him being dead and all.

By the way, India and Pakistan have been popping out with the big guns and rhetoric for awhile now. Perhaps they'll start up now?

Probably won't though because they are cowardly scum that hide behind walls and desks.

[edit on 24/12/08 by MacDonagh]

Originally posted by theresult
reply to post by Daedalus3

 

do u care? will it affect u? will u think about it when an abomb drops on you?

no u wont i hate being so honest sometimes but cmon so what if they go to war ??

all good bring on rapture lol

people worry waaaay to much about stuff thats not going to efect them

what is the worst that can happen to you death?? zzzzzz borrring

what is with matter with people its like ur programmed to LOVE THE DEATH or the wanting of it.. I WANT THE END OF THE WORLD DAMMITT

thats what it sounds like to me fear mungering muppets with nother better to do..

when was the last time u read something good on here?? a? .. jeez i need a drink u guys make life so depressing sometimes

can we tone down the end of the world thing please??? and focus on things like aliens and space ??

i dont mean to be so forward but its very depressing

dude you gotta check out the polar bear and the husky dog it's friggin' sweet. That thread is worth 20 doomsdayers in my book.

There's a scenario that I think may play out here....India against Pakistan then sometime during or shortly after the us takes on iran. Big if, I know, but ya heard people talking about that for awhile. Ok so in this scenario, could anyone picture the rest of the world not jumping in?
I thinka viable way to achieve their goals (ptb) would be to put Iran on the backburner, concentrate all the attention on India, set up a false flag (set up/allow=same thing) event that's blamed on Iran, and have the event put the US in sucha position as to lose face if they don't enter....And by the way people tallkin' about "you don't care about them" and "other side of the world so it doesn't matter" should check their humanity. I'm from BC and I know a lot of east indians who're great people and who're having a horrible christmas. That's one way that something on the other side of the world becomes real. peace all.

When the The World Trade center of New York, a financial hub, was destroyed someone had to pay. Going after individual terrorists cells was not good enough, a national sovereignty had to fall for the error. Afganistan and then Iraq had to pay the cost for the 9-11-2001 event.

The terrorist attack in Mumbai were executed at a Hotel commonly used by financial foreigners. Now people will think twice about going to India in this area. This is not acceptable by the Indian authorities. Since India thinks Pakistan harbors terrorists it will be Pakistan that will pay the cost. I can see the Pakistani government being overthrown over this.

Unfortunately nukes may be involved in this next battle. If nukes fly the whole world will be involved and I believe a new era of world government will unfold.

If business is affected by terrorism sovereignties will fall. Money is more important than religion in this world. The other side of the coin. If drug traffic stops governments will pay. See Mexico's current problem.


[edit on 24-12-2008 by lostinspace]

Nice Anti American slant to Magic Mushroom I sure hate those type of people. Why do you blame the United States for things happening in other countries. If we get directly involved militarywise than yes thats a different story. But supporting allied countries like India does not make us involved really and doesnt mean we will be there kicking Pakistans teeth down its throat and we could.

Afganistan and Iraq here we are not fighting at the full strength of the US military. There is only about 150,000 troops in Iraq and about 31,000 in Afganistan. You wanna see the power of the armies look back at WW2 Millions of men, hundreds of ships it can be like that again!

Stop your Anti American slant





down with Obama

reply to post by dreab_boy


I thought it's bin a while since someone rattled their sabres,
and with dubya busy pack'n in bags and all.

Is this one of those silly boy things, mine is bigger than yours? Why don't they quit posturing and whip it out so it can be measured. If it is my nukes bigger than yours than lite em up and the silly argument will be over.

if this is true... at least we'll have some cool fireworks for new years eve...

reply to post by TrueAmerican


No matter for showing proof, knocking off the pakistani balls in for sure, those bastards attack us in border even when the situation is normal and calm, pakistani are real ass pokers and they deserve a missile attack from their mother #s and till the pakistan PM balls getting fried off

The humans a brutual and war-like by nature. Wars and Battles happend since the beginning of time. Cave people killed each other, people killed there kids for scrafice through the Jesus times.

People just need to get over it. If your not living in Pakistan or India you really honestly have no concern its between the Indians to settle it out themselves.