It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by masqua
T&C's are to be strictly adhered to.
Originally posted by masqua
It means that any T&C violation will not only disallow entry into the contest, but will also cause it's deletion from the forum.
Repeated attempts will garner warns.
That's what I mean by strictly.
the reasoning for this is that romantic topics often delve into pornographic fiction and profane language.
Originally posted by whaaa
but I will need specific info and guidelines of "intimate" description.
To me without some latitude; "Love" can't be accurately described.
Originally posted by masqua
The twist. It's gotta involve an you, an alien being, your significant other and LOVE.
Originally posted by masqua
It's very simple, really... profanity and pornogaphic writing is not part of this contest.
The challenge will be to write without resorting to such measures.
Did I say it had to be easy?
Originally posted by orange-light
what is meant by "your significant other"?
maybe i am from outer space , but i am not familiar with it!
Originally posted by Cadbury
I understand that. It's just your definitions of "profanity" and "pornographic" may differ vastly from my own.
Originally posted by masqua
My personal definition is based on my understanding of the T&C's. Since I am both the originator of this contest, my decision to exclude a story based on my personal interpretation will be final. There is always the Complaints function if anyone disagrees. In that way it will be seen and discussed by all staff.
If you want to prove a point regarding the T&C's and how profanity and pornography are to be designated within those rules, then I suggest you attempt to have it resolved in the ATS Issues Thread.
The T&C's are quite clear, imo, but if you have a pertinent question, I'm sure that the administrators of ATS will be happy to answer your concern.
Originally posted by Cadbury
I just think it a good idea that a man in my position (with a monumental 41 bannings under his belt and recent threats to make it 42)
I'm not trying to get your rules changed or anything like that, I just needed an absolute clarification as to what those rules actually are.