It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Military AI Supercomputer Mind Monitoring: What I have learned

page: 17
61
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 24 2009 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by miragezero

Originally posted by tmk81
reply to post by miragezero
 


So you have communicated with this thing directly?

Yes, both verbal and visual dialogues where the AI used clear intelligible avatars and visions. It has also used indirect communication techniques as I have previously described.

The dialogues were often psychotic in nature and under the rubric of self-discovery.


This is not a very good basis for a turing test since it cannot be disproven that it is not actually a psychotic episode and no direct communication took place. Additionally it would not have passed your turing test if you had discovered it was an ai. That means it failed it or had failed it on purpose.


tmk81,

What miragezero said rings very true.

The most likely conclusion to be drawn is that you have had another psychotic episode...

You really need to get some help - trust me if there was anything to all of this I would know - my unique mixture of OCD and ADD makes me very resistant to hypnosis.

I am not trolling - I really would like to see you get some help - this level of paranoia can't be healthy!



posted on Aug, 25 2009 @ 01:35 AM
link   
reply to post by TruthMagnet
 



What miragezero said rings very true.

The most likely conclusion to be drawn is that you have had another psychotic episode...

You really need to get some help - trust me if there was anything to all of this I would know - my unique mixture of OCD and ADD makes me very resistant to hypnosis.

I am not trolling - I really would like to see you get some help - this level of paranoia can't be healthy!


I may not term the experiences as just a psychotic episode, the experiences that tmk is saying are very real because this technology exists and I have myself experienced this technology so I can relate to what he is saying. It is very easy to dismiss it as a pshychotic episode but you have to experience it in order to believe it.

So not everyone who talks about mind control is psychotic in nature and there are so may here on ATS who have experienced it



posted on Aug, 26 2009 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by sunny_2008ny
reply to post by TruthMagnet
 



What miragezero said rings very true.

The most likely conclusion to be drawn is that you have had another psychotic episode...

You really need to get some help - trust me if there was anything to all of this I would know - my unique mixture of OCD and ADD makes me very resistant to hypnosis.

I am not trolling - I really would like to see you get some help - this level of paranoia can't be healthy!


I may not term the experiences as just a psychotic episode, the experiences that tmk is saying are very real because this technology exists and I have myself experienced this technology so I can relate to what he is saying. It is very easy to dismiss it as a pshychotic episode but you have to experience it in order to believe it.

So not everyone who talks about mind control is psychotic in nature and there are so may here on ATS who have experienced it




How do you know? YOU think you have, you cant prove it and links to propossed POSSIBLE technology that some have posted on here still does not prove any of this is true and that you cannot dispute!


None of you have any concrete evidence for what is claimed thats why me and many others find it so hard to believe because its only what you guys think and claim!

So if it was all in your mind you would not know THATS the whole point!!!



posted on Aug, 26 2009 @ 11:15 PM
link   
reply to post by wmd_2008
 



None of you have any concrete evidence for what is claimed thats why me and many others find it so hard to believe because its only what you guys think and claim!


The concrete evidence is what? What can you give as evidence if this is in your brain?



posted on Aug, 30 2009 @ 10:13 PM
link   
As far as the entirety of the topic goes I cannot say, but the government does use an AI Neural Net as a defensive system, although it seems less self aware and schitzo as skynet or something of the sorts.
The closest that we have come to self-sentience is the work of IBM and it's Blue Gene System. Although the direct research is for protein folding, an alternate usage of the system, and the one that seems most prevailant is the fact that it can (supposedly) replicate consciousness.

Just my 2 cents.



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Still my favorite thread in the history of ATS.


Whenever I'm feeling down I read the OP and have a laugh.

[edit on 31-8-2009 by SuperViking]



posted on Aug, 31 2009 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Seems like a machine designed to pick out certain types of brain activity to ensure no 1 makes an advancement in humanity on the PTB and becomes A superhero or villan/ ENHANCED HUMAN ON THOSE WHO MAY BE WATCHING. SOUNDS INTERESTING THREADSTER



posted on Oct, 5 2009 @ 09:05 PM
link   
A music video I put together:




posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 04:57 PM
link   
Hello, I'm new to ATS.

Your post is entertaining, but such powerful AI is just a product of your imagination. And linking some articles about exotic topics on wikipedia doesn't make it more real. The computational power to do such operations is really far beyond reality.



posted on Jan, 3 2010 @ 05:19 PM
link   
Regardless of how some of you have interpreted what has been a government psy ops concern for years...behavioral modification and remotely done at that...proof will be released. Don`t get lost in your routine thought patterns...


 
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
 



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:43 AM
link   
Another music video:

A visual of open space technology :
source: www.stk.com...

Read about the military satellites shown in the video here: www.losangeles.af.mil...



Mod edit to replace the video on poster's request

[edit on 16 Jan 2010 by Hellmutt]



posted on Jan, 28 2010 @ 10:51 PM
link   
Another video (you may want to turn your volume down):



Some of the source material:

Advanced Extremely High Frequency
Satellite Reconnaissance: Secret Eyes in Space
AN/APG-81 - F-35 AESA Radar
That's Impossible: Mind Control
We're DIA

Tour through Cold War era underground city:



Skeptical? www.bbc.co.uk...

[edit on 29-1-2010 by tmk81]



posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 02:06 PM
link   
Still at it eh? Have you recorded anything unusual?



posted on Feb, 5 2010 @ 02:07 PM
link   
Duplicate

[edit on 5-2-2010 by miragezero]



posted on Feb, 20 2010 @ 03:30 AM
link   
A segment on microwave hearing a phenomenon reportedly discovered during World War II:



It should be noted that other frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum (ELF, radio, THz, IR) also have interactive properties with brain tissue.

[edit on 20-2-2010 by tmk81]



posted on Feb, 20 2010 @ 03:31 AM
link   
A 1999 experiment which translated the neural signals of a cat's vision to digital video. berkeley.edu...





[edit on 20-2-2010 by tmk81]



posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 04:35 AM
link   
Xcon 2004 - Richard Sauder - Hidden Empire: Underground Bases and Tunnels


Google Video Link


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 05:16 AM
link   
I think that anyone who hears voices and has paranoid delusions of secret organisations using super computers to read and influence their thoughts needs to seek psychiatric help immediately.

Also, the OP seems to demonstrate some form of obsessive behaviour in his posts. It seems that he is compelled to link to a wikipedia page every other line when in most cases it is simply not necessary. For example, we all know what animalsare, and I'm pretty sure that we all know who Osama Bin Laden is without having to consult wikipedia to find out.

This sort of behaviour should not be encouraged.



posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by RMFX1
 

Have you actually read any of the links that describe that which isn't "public knowledge"?

As far as animals go, are you aware of what the Pentagon has done with some of them?

Are you aware of what the Pentagon does? Neither does an oversight committee...



The programs have grown too fast and are spread through the Defense Department budget in a way that hampers oversight, complain the House and Senate Armed Services committees and the House Appropriations Committee. They also suggest that the military is producing propaganda and other materials that mask U.S. government sponsorship and focus "far beyond a traditional military information operations."

Link

Behavioural Modification is a very interesting concern and to do it remotely tosses accountability right out the window.

I for one can appreciate tmk's posts and it should be noted that you cannot accurately describe his behaviour or mental state based on various posts made on a message board.

There's an interesting world out there...



[edit on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:32:50 -0500 by MemoryShock]



new topics

top topics



 
61
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join