Military AI Supercomputer Mind Monitoring: What I have learned

reply to post by leeda

TMK could u please tell me how u worked out it was artificial intelligence and how u figured everything out.

Here are two posts in this thread which address this question 1, 2.

It has been and continues to be a harrowing experience. 2009 may be the 'final inning' in this battle against the forces of evil. According to my interpretation of synchronistic world events, 2009 is the 108th rung on the ladder to Apocalypse. Here is some information on the significance of 108 as a number of completion: Meaning of 108 beads on a mala, Why 108.

Additionally, someone posted this interesting piece of information about the esoteric meaning of 9/11: if 9 is understood as one step below God then 9/11 could represent an occult spell of 9 jumping 10 to become 11 viz. "To Become More powerful than God". This could possibly signify a mega hex to occur from 2009 to 2011 by this system to consolidate its global dominion.

Since we are among the chosen to speak with confidence about this system we should do something creative with our knowledge. Here is an idea I posted in the thread US govt mind control:

Since information on this topic is cluttered it is difficult to understand. There are patents and documented technologies but nothing convincing has been put together for the average person. I think a new resource should be created entirely devoted to tackling this problem. As a general idea:

1. Present this system through conjecture.
2. Collate all information on this system into categories and subsystems.
3. Provide a clear interface which visualizes this system.
4. Allow anyone to submit information.

I would be interested in collaborating with others to create something like this. You can U2U me if interested.

reply to post by tmk81

For example, maybe it anticipated a physical force causing the bag to tip over and as a result triggered your brain to think about this event before it happened

tmk, first of all, thanks for your valuable input on this. I think your idea of the system guessing some physical event and then making it appear as if it was telekinensis seems to be true for the event of the bag, since the burger inside tipped over when the bag fell

However, the Franfurt airport incident puzles me.

I had bought some pasta in a plastic container with a lid on it. I opened the lid and poured all the pasta onto a paper dish. The container was empty subsequently and I placed the lid on it. Since the airport was airconditioned there were no wind currents and there were no people around or passing by me, when this happened, thats what intrigues me. (There was no force that I can think of, like a wind or something)

I requested them if, using my brain, they could move the lid on top of the container. They agreed and I looked at the lid and within a second, the lid flew off and landed some feet away, in front of the next table. The distance must have been atleast 4 feet. I cant think of any force that could do this in an airport. On a beach, may be yes. The plastic container was a typical one you get in delis, and there was no tension or strength inside the container, that may have done this. So I believed that this must be telekinesis.

reply to post by sunny_2008ny

You could be lying. I have read hoaxers on this board who post lies intending them to be debunked (here is an example 1); in effect this tactic diminishes the credibility of all posters on this board.

Assuming you are telling the truth, it would have taken some causal force to move the lid. Perhaps it was a gust of air you didn't detect which blew the lid off the container. If the lid was secure on the container then maybe some unobserved potential energy caused the lid to pop off. Disregarding air resistance, the amount of energy it takes for a 20 g object to travel in a parabolic trajectory a distance of 1.2 m from a height of 1 m can be calculated using kinematics:

Dy = -1 m = 0*t - 0.5*g*t*t => t = 0.45 s
Dx = 1.2 m = Vix*t => Vix = 2.7 m/s
KE = 0.5 * 0.02 kg * (2.7 m/s)^2 = 73 mJ

I don't know if electromagnetic energy from a satellite could produce such dynamics directly. I also have never experienced such an event.

Here is a helpful tutorial on remote sensing: Dr. Nicholas Short's Remote Sensing Tutorial

[edit on 21-2-2009 by tmk81]

reply to post by tmk81

You could be lying. I have read hoaxers on this board who post lies intending them to be debunked (here is an example 1); in effect this tactic diminishes the credibility of all posters on this board.

I can assure you that I am not lying, nor am I any kind of a disinformation agent that wants something debunked.

Based on the equation you have given in the post I can think of 2 possibilites

1) The energy came from my brain
2) The energy came from the satellite

I am told that the energy was manufactured in my brain since it is easy to focus on an object from a close range, rather than by satellite.

However I wont completely dismiss the satellite idea either

Originally posted by sunny_2008ny
Based on the equation you have given in the post I can think of 2 possibilites

1) The energy came from my brain
2) The energy came from the satellite

How can you conclude that based on the equations?

The third equation merely stipulates the amount of mJoules that it would take to move the object regardless of what actually produces the energy.

As stated, the equations only define the physical properties of the movement...not what moved them. So your conclusions are based on a fallacious line of reasoning and are not exclusive of other 'possibilities'...

No offense...

reply to post by MemoryShock

So your conclusions are based on a fallacious line of reasoning and are not exclusive of other 'possibilities'

When I looked at the equations, honestly I had no clue. Then I read it up on internet and understood that it denotes the amount of energy required to move an object a certain distance.

With this in mind I thought that there are only 2 possibilites...the satellite or my brain. Cant think of any other.

With the 9:11 occult theory.

If 9 is the number below God this is again talking about the Sephirot concept.

In that concept there are actually 11 sephirot not 10 the 11th is hidden, and actually comes before the 10th. if you where trying to access it.

I.E. 9 would be Binah (understanding) or Chokhmah (wisdom) depending on your POV, 10 would be Kether (which I guess is what you would call god), however Kether is really 11 not 10 because of Dauth (knowledge) which is hidden between Binah and Chokmah and is needed to access Kether.

So my interpretation would be if you want to interpret the significance of the date, a bridge to god, as opposed to a bridge OVER god, if you see what I mean.

I will post a brief overview for a few commercial satellite constellations which illustrate the concept of (complete or near) global satellite coverage with minimal latency. I assume the AI system is using a LEO satellite constellation for mind monitoring since it is able to interact in foreign countries, on airplanes and at all hours of the day and night in real-time.

Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) - view over the equator

Credit: ESA

Description
70% of all catalogued objects are in low-Earth orbit (LEO), which extends to 2000 km above the Earth's surface. To observe the Earth, spacecraft must orbit at such a low altitude. The spatial density of objects increases at high latitudes. Note: The debris field shown in the image is an artist's impression based on actual data. However the image does not show debris items in their actual size or density. Note: The debris objects shown in the images are an artist's impression based on actual density data. However, the debris objects are shown at an eggagerated size to make them visible at the scale shown.

source: www.esa.int...

1. Iridium Satellite Constellation

The design of the Iridium network allows voice and data messages to be routed anywhere in the world. Voice and data calls are relayed from one satellite to another until they reach the satellite above the Iridium handset or terminal and the signal is relayed back to Earth. When an Iridium customer places a call from a handset or terminal, it connects to whatever satellite happens to be overhead, and is relayed among satellites around the globe to whatever satellite is above the appropriate Earth gateway, which downlinks the call and transfers it to the global public voice network or Internet so that it reaches the recipient.

The satellites are in a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 485 miles (780 km). The 66 active satellites fly in formation in six orbital planes, evenly spaced around the planet, each with 11 satellites equally spaced apart from each other in that orbital plane.

A single satellite completely circles the Earth once every 100 minutes, traveling at a rate of 16,832 miles per hour, and traveling from horizon to horizon across the sky in about ten minutes. As a satellite moves out of reach, the call is seamlessly handed over to the next satellite coming into view.

Since Iridium is a LEO satellite system, voice delays are typically unnoticeable. Other mobile satellite systems use Geostationary Earth Orbits (GEOs), which, by comparison, are about 22,300 miles above the equator. As a result, latency can be quite high, causing speakers to have to wait for each other to finish. GEOs are also largely ineffective in more northern or southern latitudes. The curvature of the Earth disrupts message transmission when attempted at the edge of a GEO satellite's footprint.

Each Iridium satellite is cross-linked to four other satellites - two satellites in the same orbital plane and two in an adjacent plane. These links create a dynamic network in space - calls are routed among Iridium satellites without touching the ground, creating a highly secure and reliable connection. Cross-links make Iridium particularly impervious to natural disasters - such as hurricanes, tsunamis and earthquakes - that can damage ground-based wireless towers since cross-links are space-based.

The Iridium ground network is comprised of the system control segment and telephony gateways used to connect into the terrestrial telephone system. With centralized management of the Iridium network, the system control segment supplies global operational support and control services for the satellite constellation, delivers satellite tracking data to the gateways, and controls the termination of Iridium messaging services.

source: www.iridium.com...



Iridium Satellite Constellation Simulation

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS

Iridium

This is the 'perfect' fully-deployed first-generation Iridium system, which provides voice and low-rate data services. Iridium was originally designed with 77 active satellites, and so given the name 'Iridium', for the element with periodic number 77 and 77 orbiting electrons.

The Iridium constellation was later redesigned to reduce the number of active satellites needed to 66 - but the name was not changed to that of element 66: 'Dysprosium', which is Latin for 'bad approach.

Designed for voice telephony and low-rate data. In the decade while Iridium was being designed and built, GSM telephony became widespread, removing the intended 'business traveller' market and leading to a focus on specialist industries in remote areas.

Full constellation launched as of May 1998. Service offered as of end of 1998. Filed for US Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection August 1999, and later re-emerged as Iridium Satellite.

A Walker polar star geometry. Note the 'orbital seam' where the footprints of ascending (going north over the Equator) and descending (going (south) satellites overlap more to ensure continuous coverage.

See www.iridium.com...

Uses intersatellite links, which are not yet simulated here.

source: SaVi

2. Teledesic Satellite Constellation

Teledesic was a company founded in the 1990s to build a commercial broadband satellite constellation for Internet services. Using low-earth orbiting satellites small antennas could be used to provide uplinks of as much as 100 Mbit/second and downlinks of up to 720 Mbit/second. The original 1995 proposal was extremely ambitious, costing over US$9 billion originally planning 840 active satellites with in-orbit spares at an altitude of 700 km.[1] In 1997 the scheme was scaled back to 288 active satellites at 1400 km[2] and was later scaled back further in complexity and number of satellites as the projected market demand continued to decrease.

The commercial failure of the similar Iridium and Globalstar ventures (composed of 66 and 48 operational satellites, respectively) and other systems, along with bankruptcy protection filings, were primary factors in halting the project, and Teledesic officially suspended its satellite construction work on October 1, 2002.

source: en.wikipedia.org...

Teledesic (840) Satellite Constellation - SaVi Simulation

• 21 planes of 40 active satellites at 695-705 km altitude

PROPOSED LARGE BROADBAND CONSTELLATIONS - FAT PIPE DREAMS

Teledesic (original Calling 840-active-satellite design)

Announced with much publicity in 1994. With 840 active satellites, and 84 on-orbit spares for 924 satellites in orbit, this was the largest commercial proposal and the height of dot-com decade optimism.

The constellation is a Walker polar star; there is a 2-degree hole in coverage at the poles.

Redesigned in 1997 to a reduced 288-active satellite system.

The simulation shows optimum ABABA spacing between co-rotating planes. In reality, maintaining phasing between planes for all these satellites is recognised to be impossible, making phasing offsets random.

Uses intersatellite links, which are not yet simulated here.

source: SaVi

Teledesic (288) Satellite Constellation - SaVi Simulation

• 12 planes of 24 active satellites at 1350km altitude

PROPOSED LARGE BROADBAND CONSTELLATIONS - FAT PIPE DREAMS

Teledesic (288-active satellite Boeing design)

A reduced number of satellites, at higher altitude, than the first 840-active-satellite proposal.

Based on a Boeing-led redesign before a merger with Motorola's competing Celestri effort in May 1998, which was then followed by a planned 30-active-satellite MEO system announced in February 2002.

In October 2002 Teledesic suspended satellite work, and in July 2003 surrendered allocated frequencies.

Craig McCaw, who had funded Teledesic development, then invested in the company developing the smaller MEO ICO system.

Uses intersatellite links, which are not yet simulated here.

source: SaVi

Originally posted by tmk81
Here is one disturbing aspect of this system's programming:

Through my experience I have learned that it has a causal understanding of my thoughts and can create certain stimuli which influence my mind in predictable ways. One technique it uses is pairing of stimuli. For instance, it often creates creeping tactile sensations on my genitals while projecting morphing sexual images into my field of vision followed by sound modulations or voices; it does this repeatedly which makes me feel shame and discomfort.

It has controlled me in similar ways since childhood. When I was around twelve it projected homosexual pornographic images in my mind; I eventually started using aversion therapy, such as pinching myself, to try to make them stop.

I have ’occult’ associations and come from a line of religious leaders which I consider the most likely reason why I was targeted for this abuse.

I have read most all of the posts in this thread, having come here after a google search on Project Looking Glass (black ops not the desktop tool!)

I mean no disrespect, and I know you have heard this before, however honest and respectful dialogue in the following area is as important to determining the full picture of what is happening as anything else that will be said.

Certainly you have been told, and if you have seen a psychiatrist given the diagnosis, that ALL of your behaviors, beliefs, experiences, etc. which are being related here constitute the textbook diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. Keep in mind that a Paranoid Schizophrenic is absolutely convinced that their experiences are real and that they do not need any medical help, and that those around them who do not agree are out to get them and certainly wrong.

Belief that one has been 'chosen', comes from a lineage of 'special' heritage (Freemason/minister/native american/colonist in your case), auditory/tactile/visual hallucinations, instruction from voices, certainty that government organizations(s) control their mind/thoughts/actions/future/words/entire life, exhibits bizarre thinking regarding every aspect of their life (sexual mind control, occult, family/church thought you were a demon/devil, substance abuse, ability to form relationships), self mutilation as described above , and VERY high intelligence (although you denied knowing much science you discuss very technical areas of physics, math, etc.)

In other words, it is difficult to get past how perfectly the diagnosis fits and other than your denial, which ironically also fits the diagnosis, we have nothing to refute it. Again, no disrespect and in the interest of validating (as must be done with any area of scientific exploration) the phenomenon, have you in fact seen a psychiatrist and what was the outcome? Were you ever placed on medication?

reply to post by TryThinking


And your qualifications for this diagnosis are...?

Originally posted by TryThinking
In other words, it is difficult to get past how perfectly the diagnosis fits and other than your denial, which ironically also fits the diagnosis, we have nothing to refute it. Again, no disrespect and in the interest of validating (as must be done with any area of scientific exploration) the phenomenon, have you in fact seen a psychiatrist and what was the outcome? Were you ever placed on medication?

Surely you see the trap in this though?

Suppose he had seen a psychiatrist, been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, and put on some form of medication. None of that would necessarily rule out the possibility that what he describes as real is real. It would just suggest that the psychiatrist he saw doesn't believe that these perceptions reflect reality. Since he already seems to be aware that what he's describing is not widely accepted as actually happening that doesn't tell us anything new.

Certainly there are alternative explanations for the subjective experiences of the OP. But unless one of them could be definitively either ruled out or proven, the best evidence he can give is his experience and his understanding of it.

As far as diagnosing over the internet goes, I think most psychiatrists would be extremely reluctant to offer any diagnosis of the OP as a whole person based on just this one thread. You say paranoid schizophrenia; I say (ruling out the possibility that what he's telling us is the absolute reality for argument's sake) maybe he's a compulsive liar. Or maybe he's a paid disinformant. Or maybe he's a novelist collecting material. Or maybe he's an AI himself programmed to interact on internet forums.

Or, maybe he's telling us the truth as he sees it, and maybe hearing that truth tells us more about humanity than giving him a label ever could.

Click here for more information.

3. Globalstar Satellite Constellation

The Globalstar constellation consists of 40 Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) satellites, with an additional four satellites in orbit as spares.

The Globalstar satellite is simple; Each consists of an antenna, a trapezoidal body, two solar arrays and a magnetometer, and operates at an altitude of 1,414km (876 miles).

The satellites utilize "bent-pipe" architecture. On any given call, several satellites transmit a caller's signal via CDMA technology to a satellite dish at the appropriate gateway where the call is then routed locally through the terrestrial telecommunications system.

source: www.globalstar.com...

Globalstar Satellite Constellation - SaVi Simulation

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS

Globalstar

This is the 'perfect' fully-deployed first-generation Globalstar system, which provides voice and low-rate data services.

Full constellation launched as of November 1999; notably lost twelve satellites on a failed Zenit 2 launch in September 1998. Service officially launched in October 1999. Filed for US Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection February 2002, and re-emerged in April 2004.

Despite the name, this does not offer global coverage, and is not a Walker polar star constellation. The geometry is that of a Walker delta, or a Ballard rosette. Does not use intersatellite links; connections are only completed when a ground gateway station shares a footprint with a terminal.

See also www.globalstar.com...

source: SaVi

Here is some data from Big LEO tables showing the propagation delay and beam characteristics for the Iridium, Teledesic (840) and Globalstar constellations (as of 1999):

Orbits andGeometryIridiumTeledesic (840)GlobalstarAltitude (km)780 695-7051410 Number of satellites66 active6 in-orbit spares 840 activeup to 84 in-orbit spares48 active 8 in-orbit sparesNumber of planes6 218 Inclination (°)86.4 98.1652 Minimum earth-space link one-way propagation delay (ms)2.60 2.324.63Maximum earth-space link one-way propagation delay (ms)8.22 3.4011.5Beam and re-usecharacteristicsIridiumTeledesic (840)GlobalstarBeams per satellite48 64 beams (supercells)576 cells16 Total number of beams3168(not all used due to polar overlap) 53760768 Beam diameter (km)600 (minimum) 53.3 (cell width) *table correction2254, average Footprint diameter (km)4700 14125850
Notice that the propagation delay for each constellation is in the millisecond range and each satellite has multiple beams. For the Teledesic system, the Earth's surface is divided into 'supercells' of length 160 km where each satellite covers 64 supercells and each satellite beam covers 1 supercell by scanning 9 cells in 23.111 ms cycles (see picture below) [1].

Teledesic Earth Fixed Cells

A common misconception is that satellite communications will always have noticeable communication lag as seen in live television broadcasts from Iraq. This lag is due to geosynchronous satellites such as Milstar which operate at an altitude of about 42,000 km.

You can track various satellite constellations with Google Earth using the kml file available here: openaprs.net.
Other resources which offer satellite visualization include:
Celestia (satellite add-on)
SaVi
NASA Satellite Tracking
Worldwind (satellite add-on)

[edit on 13-3-2009 by tmk81]

reply to post by TryThinking

In other words, it is difficult to get past how perfectly the diagnosis fits and other than your denial, which ironically also fits the diagnosis, we have nothing to refute it. Again, no disrespect and in the interest of validating (as must be done with any area of scientific exploration) the phenomenon, have you in fact seen a psychiatrist and what was the outcome? Were you ever placed on medication?

Here is a post which addresses your question 1. Medications helped to sedate my emotional response to this interference but they did not eliminate it.

Here is an essential primer on remote mind control weapons: International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons

Here is a blog with some general information on artificial telepathy which is free of the personal associations you have crudely addressed: Artificial Telepathy

Do some research and 'try thinking' then you might have something constructive to say.

reply to post by CrabPaste!!!

I've worked in the military, I've worked for the government and I've worked for defence contractors and I know how incompetent they all are.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The spams can't even get a grip of a bunch of farmers in afghan.

You must be referring to the people such as yourself--dumb and incompetent. Not everyone is like yourself.

All you people worried about this super mind reading computer just put your tin foil hats on and you will be ok!

reply to post by wmd_2008

All you people worried about this super mind reading computer just put your tin foil hats on and you will be ok

Tin foil cannot prevent mind control. And mind reading and mind control are 2 different things, although they are used in conjunction with each other. I would suggest to people that they give due consideration to the fact that what is being told could be true.

I have had positive experiences with this technology and I too faced a lot of ridicule in the thread that I posted regarding this.