It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Simple, they are not Americans, they don't have the "super power" mentality preventing them to adopt something "not invented here". That is what it boiled down to.
reply to post by Totakeke
I wonder how people would feel if they knew their pounds and miles came from the country against whom we fought for our independence heh.
It has nothing to do with the system not being invented here. It's got nothing to do with people being too stubborn to adopt something from another country. However; it is unnecessary. You seem to be thinking that we're all scientists and doctors or pharmacists and whatnot. Well, we're not. We don't NEED to use the metric system when the only time it becomes really helpful is when you need to measure something colossal or something microscopic.
The average person doesn't deal with measuring all the time...true...however, when they do need to measure things, they are not normally going to be very very small or very very large...which is the only time that the metric system has any true benefit.
which is the only time that the metric system has any true benefit.
However; if you want to bring money into this at all, by your logic, we should all just adopt one kind of money for the entire world.
I'd be interested in why you are personally invested in the metric change for the US. Beyond the fact that in many ways metric is superior. Why should America make the huge monetary and personal effort to do the conversion? Why now when seemingly every other value Americans hold dear is under attack and the monetary system is going south?
reply to post by Totakeke
I think we've proven that money is no object.
(Remember now, it's the English system that came from England. America didn't even have a measuring system before the Europeans got here.)
And it's not like it's difficult, either. Australia is a great example
People would be informed that a national transition is going to happen,
If and when we have proven THAT we can eliminate the US as a viable economic entity! Go back to Economics 101 please.
Is there anyone (seriously) in America with any education who doesn't realize that the English system didn't come from England?? My goodness!
And who would do the informing? Some political figure? I doubt it. Too risky.
reply to post by da pickles
You're saying the English system doesn't come from England or did I misread that?
They do teach it in schools. Everyone hates it. Few understand it. That's how I ended up doing tutoring sessions in the library after school. It's not as easy as just producing a bunch of commercials like the did with DTV (mistake). There's a lot more to it than just that. Aside from switching the roadsigns over, you'd have to change all the cars because most cars now don't switch between both. I know my fathers Buick does, but it's some silly luxury model from a few years back.
I don't really think it would create jobs, we already have road workers. The only accomplishment that would come out of FORCING the nation to make the unnecessary switch is this:
The majority of people would be heavily annoyed.
There's a reason that this didn't work in the 70's.
reply to post by Totakeke
the metric board itself didn't plan very well. They knew the goal, but they didn't actually know how to achieve it. They didn't say, "We're going to be metric in 10 years and here's how it's going happen." That's pretty much where it stopped.