It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In Hokkaido, coseismic steps in groundwater level or discharge rate at thirty-two observation wells and at an undersea coal mine were detected . . . Smaller coseismic persistent groundwater level changes associated with the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake were also detected
at ten of the forty-two observation stations in Honshu, Japan, some of which are located about 1,000 km away from the epicenter.
Groundwater in deep underground also fluctuated by the earthquake and their spatial distribution seemed to be related to the distance and the direction from the epicenter of the earthquake.
Meters put in sealed wells at the same depth showed changes in water pressure, indicating that fluids had moved during the same time period. Such fluid movement is expected during a quake and perhaps beforehand; anecdotes of water levels shifting in wells and streams before quakes are common lore.
If that was the case then the earthquakes should happen more in the areas from where the oil was taken, and that is not what happens.
Originally posted by Time=Now
I'm not religious, & I'm sure these quakes could be manipulated, however it is also a possibility that the elite that have advanced knowledge were completely aware that by taking Oil out of the ground, increased earthquakes would occur.
We're now roughly one week from the twin quakes window in Cliff's predictive linguistics work when the world seems likely, based on language shifts that have preceded similar events in the past, a pair of quakes, as least one of which is linguistically destined to isolate a bunch of people and cause severe socioeconomic impacts including offers of foreign aid. Here again, 'life by halves' features some folks will be ready because of their learning and experience which will allow them to see the possibilities in advance and prepare to meet them on their own terms, while the other side denies that language precedes change and that Cliff & I are just a couple of nutjobs.
No dispute about this last point from us, but as we've said in the past, "Just because we may be nuts doesn't make us wrong". Remember when we posted the last 'big quake' advisory a couple of days before the China 7.8 - 8.0 quake in May. Off by a day or two in the May 9 and May 10 warnings, but that's why I call the predictive linguistics project a "rickety time machine". When it takes a half linguist/ half SQL-guru and 200+ executables in four languages (dos, perl, c, & prolog) to weed though terabytes of data, no, this is not something you'll be seeing on Amazon any time soon with a slick Vista graphics front-end..
Originally posted by ArMaP
If that was the case then the earthquakes should happen more in the areas from where the oil was taken, and that is not what happens.
Originally posted by Time=Now
I'm not religious, & I'm sure these quakes could be manipulated, however it is also a possibility that the elite that have advanced knowledge were completely aware that by taking Oil out of the ground, increased earthquakes would occur.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
For those who are into prophecies and the New Madrid earthquakes -
AngelFire gathers together those kinds of things. They claim - hundreds of prophetic voices confirm New Madrid Earthquake.
Enjoy reading.
Originally posted by RolandBrichter
"But the end of America as a world power came as visions of two horrendous earthquakes in which buildings were swaying & toppling over like a child's wooden blocks. I knew that these quakes happened sometime before the end of the century, but I couldn't tell where they took place. I do remember seeing a large body of water that was probably a river. The cost of rebuilding these destroyed cities would be the final straw for our government, now so financially broken that it would hardly be able to keep itself alive. The voice in the vision told me that it would be this way while the images from the box showed Americans starving & lined up for food."
His predictionsHERE
His timing may be off, but it is eerily similar to the webbot predictions
Originally posted by RolandBrichter
His predictionsHERE
Originally posted by RFBurns
As many times as WEBBOT has been wrong, why do so many keep on thinking it will be right the next time around?
Originally posted by computerwiz32
gosh, I am a programmer and I know how web bots work.
they can't predict they are nothing good but to record what we all think on the internet.
they make based on statictis ... it runs a search. It goes to many websites on the internet takes texts and counts how many it shows up.
like detroit gets hit by economy if it sees this so many times it will spit out the date of those posts and say detroit gets hit by economy on dec 2007 etc.
Now if you have people talking saying oh I think the U.S economy will get bad by FEB 2009.
now if millions of people are talking about that same thing then the web bot goes oh I think by FEB 2009 the U.S ecoomy will get bad.
this is what it does.
now if we are informed and we have hunches then that statement could be true and if it turns out to be true then it was because of the people not the the bot.
the bot just reads what we put out on the internet. Then filters the info for predictions based on how we in America think.
Now even if the bot is right on this ... it dosen't ment the bot knew it.
There were scientist that were talking saying that they think by late 2008 that Cali is due for another big earthquake.
Now people hearing that made predictions and I bet they put December and kept change the date. in dec.
I highly doubt the spider bot will be right on this. However the scientist did say we are due for another bad earthquake for cali since that last bad earthquake.
So for me as a programmer and knowing how spider bots work ... it can't predict anything but can monitor us on what we think would happen.
we are informed better and can make decisions better then a computer. The reason why I say this is that we build the computer and program it. The computer can't be any smarter then us because we build it.
Hope this helps.
Any programmers on here on ATS would agree with me on this one. Web bots don't think we give them the logic to filter text works and use math to figure out the probability or something going to happen and base on a mathematical guess the bot spits out a headline on what could happen.
basically the computer looks at the odds of what could happen and if the odds are high it would then become a prediction.