It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
43rd Reception Battalion of Ft. Leonard Wood, MO
Once I arrived there (at or around 10:00 pm on August 14, 2008), I was informed that we weren't allowed to have pitures with anyone with their shirt off. At that point it didn't click in my head that my dad's shirt was off. [...in the picture she had taken with her] When we emptied out our personal bags to get rid of any contraband, I did the right thing and showed them the picture of my father. The woman that was going through my things picked up the picture and said something like, "You know you can't have any nudity in pictures, right?" I responded and explained to her that I didn't know before I arrived there and that the picture was of my deceased father and my mother and that it was the only picture that I have of my mother and father together. At that point she began to rip the picture and I was like "woah, can't I just mail it home?" and she said I could not and proceeded to rip the picture."
> Dear Sir,
>
> On August 14th, 2008, my daughter, [PRIVATE INFORMATION REMOVED] arrived at Ft. Leonard
> Wood Reception Battalion and began her in-processing for BCT to become an
> MP. During that in-processing, one of your soldiers (my daughter believes
> she was a Sergeant, but is unsure), destroyed a photograph of myself and
> my daughter's father. My daughter's father passed away in 2007 [sic - 2006 is the correct year] from
> cancer, and the photograph she had taken with her was the only snapshot
> that showed the two of us together. My daughter explained this to the
> woman (who was African American - to assist in identifying her) when the
> woman began to tear the picture. The woman explained that because it had
> nudity (my ex-husband was sitting in a lawnchair without a shirt on) that
> she could not keep the photo. My daughter then requested if there was
> anyway she could return it home by mail. The woman simply destroyed the
> photo. We have no negative of this photograph because it was taken by
> some one else and given to us. At this point, with many years passed, I
> cannot even recall who that would have been. This unique keepsake my
> daughter treasured is gone for good. I have attached a scanned copy of
> the photograph and my daughter's written account of what occurred.
>
> I don't get upset easily, Sir. But I must tell you that this occurrence
> enrages me beyond words. I would think that it would not be too much to
> ask to have this person identified and then request of this woman to write
> a letter of apology to my daughter. This would allow my daughter to
> understand the woman may actually have a heart (though actions to date do
> not bear that assumption out), but also give Rachel (and myself) a sense
> of reassurance that this might not happen again to another young man or
> woman entering the service. If the U.S. military cannot show that it
> understands and shares the importance of what people enlist for (their
> family as well as their country), it can't begin to expect as much from
> those it enlists.
>
> This was an unconscionable act, and amends are in order, and are expected.
>
> The apology can be mailed to...[PRIVATE INFORMATION REMOVED]
Originally posted by crazyjames65
the women who tore up the picture should be fired! and sent to court for
distruction of private property.
Valhall
My daughter went into BCT
No apology was issued to my daughter.
rcwj75
Basic/AIT are designed to SEPERATE you, TEST you, PUSH you, etc..on your physical limits but more importantly your emotional limits.
Originally posted by rcwj75
Hate to be this way
Originally posted by LordBucket
The military is in the business in invading foreign nations and killing people. That's what they do. You can make all the excuses you want that your daughter might not bepersonally pulling a trigger, but the fact remains that she is going in to become an accomplice to murder, death and destruction.
The military kills people.
How could you possibly expect them to care about a photograph?
Yes. And to emotionally desensitize you, so that you can kill people effectively and efficiently without letting emotion and sentimentality interfere. Ripping up a photograph that was important to someone no doubt would seem completely trivial in comparison.
Originally posted by Valhall
Other than being a way that you hate, did you have another point aside from proving the absolute sickness of this whole situation?
I'm thinking not.
[edit on 11-26-2008 by Valhall]
Any person subject to this chapter who willfully or recklessly wastes, spoils, or otherwise willfully and wrongfully destroys or damages any property other than military property of the United States shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Originally posted by Valhall
You seem to stand alone in your thinking.
UCMJ 909. Article 109
Any person subject to this chapter who willfully or recklessly wastes, spoils, or otherwise willfully and wrongfully destroys or damages any property other than military property of the United States shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
So, you think that only people who have no problem leaving home on their own for the first time in life should join the military?
Just drop the silly argument.
There were at least a couple of things that could have taken place at the point the evil cow destroyed the picture:
1. She could have taken custody of it and stored it. Just like they did my daughter's cell phone. The cell phone was taken and stored and then released later on for brief periods of time. The picture could have been stored in the same place.
2. She could have allowed her to return it home. At the same point that the picture was destroyed, they handed my daughter a form letter and told her to mail it home to let her family know she had arrived at Ft. Leonard Wood. The picture could have been mailed back with this letter.
There was no reason to destroy the picture. Period. It can't even be viewed as a punitive action. It was just a hateful callous action.