hovering UFO in IR

reply to post by ArMaP

You guys are funny. As this fellow posted there are tons of the same type objects in Nasa footage because there video cameras are in UV. Also their is a great youtube video that has 2 cameras setup side by side. One normal and the same model modified to pickup IR.

Objects appear in the IR view screen but you can not see them in the none IR camera view screen. A person smart enough to take apart his camera and modify it to detect IR would double check to make sure the images or real.

I mean if you are to stupid to see the proof bugger off to some other site and waste someone else time. Leave the post hear to people who are interested and smart enough to understand what is going on. You guys with your Budweiser and bean dip stick to football games and wrestling, its seems to be the only thing your capable of understanding in the visible light spectrum.

It would be quite silly to think that if these "visitors" intended to hide, that they would not just use a "cloak" that only covers one particular part of the spectrum. Maybe if this was during a time when humans did not have IR cameras, or visible cameras for that matter, radar, and satellite monitoring that looks at visible, IR and other parts of the spectrum.

For a UFO to be able to travel across the universe, or across space time, they certinaly would have the ability to bend more than just the visible spectrum wavelengths and be able to bend alot more at the same time to make sure they are staying hidden.

An interesting video tho.



Cheers!!!!

No evidence is presented to show that the object is not visible to our eyes. We see an IR filtered video of something flying in the air. I also see lots of clouds in the video. However, I know I can see clouds by naked eye, so videoing clouds in the visible spectrum is unnecessary. On the other hand, filming something thought to be invisible most certainly is. In fact it's absolutely essential.

Originally posted by Ufoash
Its is filmed in infrared, a different light wavelenth that our eyes see in and whatever it is it reflects IR.

I'm afraid that proves very little. If you think about it, I'm sure you'll agree.

WG3

[edit on 9-12-2008 by waveguide3]

[edit on 9-12-2008 by waveguide3]

[edit on 9-12-2008 by waveguide3]

reply to post by waveguide3


You know the debate of whether or not the object was only visible to IR is pointless.

I recommend we focus on the object that is flying above the house and is able to accelerate like no natural phenomena...

Obsidience

reply to post by Ufoash


Bird catching sea breeze. Is consistent with sea gulls during a breezy day with semi clear sky.

Near my home I saw a hawk hang in mid air for several minutes then turn slightly and catch a gust.

It looked just like what we saw in that video. I'm saying bird.

Originally posted by obsidience
I recommend we focus on the object that is flying above the house and is able to accelerate like no natural phenomena.

A dandylion seed floating near the roof, then taken by a breeze coming over the top would look exactly like this. Visually, the 'phenomenon' has all the characteristics of a weightless object floating off in the wind.

WG3

I thought it was a pretty good video if what you are saying is true. The object seems to fit the ufo criteria.