It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by Benarius
Originally posted by Runningtobabylon
i was there and watched it
was funny at first because you get 100's off peoplea week on vlog sites saying "oh get me a few 100 viewers and il kill myself (an hero)" suppose we shoulda done somthing
but eh, if he was going to do it anyways there would be no way for us to stop him i suppose
There would have been a way to stop him. But no, you just don't think. It could have been YOU that could have saved him if you weren't too excited see this thing succeed. Shame on you.
Judge me if you will, but I think this is pretty sick.
I just can't understand why a person would want to see human suffering and take enjoyment from it.
As I said in my last post on this, there is no artistic merit in media depicting torture and murder, so the enjoyment has to be voyeuristic and sadistic in nature.
Originally posted by Sonya610
Now a live suicide is a bit different if it realistically CAN be prevented. But read the guys comments again, they get 100 threats a week. Do you think they should freak out and inform the authorities every time it happens? If anything the sites should provide moderators to ban that sort of activity.[edit on 21-11-2008 by Sonya610]
Originally posted by berenike
I've thought of entering these chatrooms myself with the express purpose of supporting suicidal people and trying to help them overcome their problems.
I don't know, though, if I'd do more harm than good. I've no experience of any kind of chatroom and don't have a webcam.
Originally posted by thebox
It's surprising just how many sites like this actually exist without moderation. Log into Yahoo Chat right now and you'll find yourself amongst the sick, the sad and the lonely.
Companies like Yahoo and other 'chat' hosting sites should really crack down on this kind of behaviour. How difficult would it be to close down sites pertaining to such themes? At the very least blanket filters could be installed to block specific 'buzz' words. This could help deter some of this behaviour.
Originally posted by Sonya610
90% of the social sites on the net would SHUT DOWN if every site owner had to worried about being sued should "something happen". That is crazy. In the real world stuff happens, people kill themselves all the time. We don't live in a fairy tail land where every little thing can be controlled, and the idea of taking everyones rights away as a form of "protection" is even more twisted than the odd unsympathetic incident.
Originally posted by thebox
Originally posted by Sonya610
90% of the social sites on the net would SHUT DOWN if every site owner had to worried about being sued should "something happen". That is crazy. In the real world stuff happens, people kill themselves all the time. We don't live in a fairy tail land where every little thing can be controlled, and the idea of taking everyones rights away as a form of "protection" is even more twisted than the odd unsympathetic incident.
I was referring to sites in which contributors publically goad and insult others. This kind of behaviour isn't tolerated in reality so why should it carry on without moderation on the internet?
Originally posted by Solomons
Because thats the start of a slippery slope,people have the choice of vistiting numerous forums,chatrooms etc...if you give the politicans even one reason to start clamping down it will start a snowball effect.Yes there is alot of unpleasent places on the net,but id take that any day of the weeks as opposed to restricted censored internet.
[edit on 21-11-2008 by Solomons]
Originally posted by Runningtobabylon
is that any more morbid than walking down a street and pretend not to see a homeless person begging for change?
Originally posted by Runningtobabylon
i was there and watched it
was funny at first because you get 100's off peoplea week on vlog sites saying "oh get me a few 100 viewers and il kill myself (an hero)" suppose we shoulda done somthing
but eh, if he was going to do it anyways there would be no way for us to stop him i suppose
Originally posted by Runningtobabylon
reply to post by jibeho
who trying to be the internet tough guy now?
im trying to point out that there are ALOT worse things in this world than some guy killing himself on the internet
theres been alot of people that have killed themselfs on the internet and they are nothing special , most of the time just narcissistic attention whores who think they will be rememberd, when really we will all forget in a few days or so
You people dont really care if he died or not, Be honest all you care about is the chance that you can look good
And that my freinds is the folly of the internet, But that is a diffrent story for a diffrent day
Long story short, He killed himself, Build a bridge, Get over it
Originally posted by Now_Then
I remember hearing somewhere that you could more or less divide suicides into two groups, and I don't mean the method used necessarily. It's about witnesses, weather they are present or not. For example people jumping off roofs choose that way because there are people present, and in some way they are not alone at the time of death. Kinda seems the same with the internet, it's not some new wave of suicides or anything - I reckon the levels have stayed more or less the same (I don't know) just progression with the tech.
Also, along the same kind of theme, I heard that this is one reason why train companies are reluctant to remove driver from trains that could be automated - they feel that less people would throw them selves under a train with a driver - but conversely - or perversely? some would want to throw them selves under a train with a driver.
If anyone figures out why any one does anything... Do us a favour put it down in writing - got a feeling it would make you very rich.