Tech puts JFK conspiracy theories to rest

Tech puts JFK conspiracy theories to rest

www.msnbc.msn.com

A team of experts assembled by the Discovery Channel has recreated the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Using modern blood spatter analysis, new artificial human body surrogates, and 3-D computer simulations, the team determined that the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository was the most likely origin of the shot that killed the 35th president of the United States.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Stories like this have happened before. I remember watching the history channel, and wathing new 3-d models showing how the book depository shot was the lethal shot.


question is... Does this case make it more obvious? Or can we safely knock this off as dis-info?



If this has been posted today, sorry. But I havent seen it in the news section, and I just saw it on MSNBC today.

www.msnbc.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

You know you shouldn't have put something like this on a now famous conspiracy theory website. Its ironically killing it and putting cters out of business.

reply to post by deltaboy


I know, how dare I. lol. Im just raising the other side. I personally believe it was a conspiracy. But who knows. I posted a long time ago video clip that seemed to show the 6th floor window closed just 2 or 3 seconds before the shot was fired. You can search my thread history if you want to find it.

reply to post by bknapple32

You can't be serious to title the OP like that. There is no argument capable to do away with the Kennedy assassination conspiracy. That's like taking Matthew, Luke and John off the Bible.

The conspiracy will die on its own when most of the folks wouldn't remember who Kennedy was. Just check in in some 20 years and you'll see.

reply to post by bknapple32


Disinfo. The entire story falls apart with the words "Discovery Channel." Just watch what they did to prove we went to the moon and other conspiracy theories. They addressed as little real info as possible and hammered away at the most baseless crazy theories that no serious person believes anyway. Discovery is run by the same folks that bring you your "news" and "history."

They also have 'serious documentaries' about real life demonic posession and hauntings that are backed up by no facts whatsoever but they have no problem presenting that as information.

Sorry but as soon as the Discovery Channel gets involved, it is worthless.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo


Did you watch it yet?

reply to post by angel of lightangelo


We did go to the moon...

And so if Discovery and History channel are bad, then what form of televised media can we use? The channel you broadcast?

Shattered OUT...

reply to post by ShatteredSkies


Whether or not you believe we went to the moon was not my point. My point was that their 'documentary' attempt at proving it was less than weak at best. They tossed off a couple of old rumors and said "See! Proof we went!"

I am talking about their skill in "proving" things, not whether or not we went to the moon. And no you should not trust anything on tv. Why do you have to? The channel I broadcast? What is your need to get info from television? Find me one honest channel and I will show you where the owners true allegiance lies. If you really need to get your information from the television so baddly that you insist I supply you with the channels to trust, then you will live a long ignorant, ill-informed life.

He is trying to push away from Jackie


Note the bloood all over jackies coat and how calm she is.


Sorry, but this shoot came from underneath him. That projectile is deflecting off of the inside of his skull from the inside, not entering from the top. No way that shot came from above him and behind. That gun was under his chin. The same way 9/11 was done, right in front of you. Same players even. Papa bush was our man in the CIA in 63, as a matter of fact, he was in Dallas when Kennedy was killed, the very day.


Another version.


Honestly, even under shock who jumps out to pick up brains? Did she turn insane instantly? "If I pick up his brains he will live again"....Please...you would do nothing but hit the deck and pull him down with you, not jump for the brains. She dropped the GUN.

Mary Kay Ultra...Peace

So in other words... "I don't care, I'm too lazy to really provide information to back up my opinions, you'll just have to deal with being in the dark and I don't want to help you."

That's really all I understood from you.

Shattered OUT...

reply to post by angel of lightangelo


Amen...even PBS...they are probably the worst.

Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

 

We did go to the moon...

And so if Discovery and History channel are bad, then what form of televised media can we use? The channel you broadcast?

Shattered OUT...

I am sorry, where did you ask me to back something up here?

You asked what televised media you can trust. I answered none.

Calling me out on not providing proof that you never asked for is a cute attempt at discrediting me without proving a thing. Nice.

Isn't this the 2nd or 3rd time they have "put it to rest?"

Why do they even need to put it to rest again if it's that clean-cut?

Anyways... as a semi-frequent visitor to Dealy Plaza, I'm going to say that that would have been a very difficult shot to make... near impossible for a novice shooter.

reply to post by asmeone2


Yeah, they already did it a year ago with lazers and crap. They proved it then too. They apparently proved it so well they had to use even more high tech stuff to do it again. That makes sense.

reply to post by letthereaderunderstand


I find it hard to notice red blood on a pink jacket in a grainy 1960's photograph.

And I honestly don't see what you're talking about with the bullet being fired from under his chin. Are you talking about the what looks like a stream of blood coming from his head?

What's your experience in ballistics and projectiles?

Shattered OUT...

they had a reort on the news tonight about it. in the documentary they actually prove that 1 other shot could have possibly been the fatal shot. it was from the grassy knowl But when they went out to test their theory and shot at a ballistics dummy that shot didn't result in the same kind of damage.

They didn't take into effect that the shot from the grassy knowl was a mercury load. which on impact explodes.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo


You didn't answer none, all you said was I was living a lie if I wanted to believe in television as a media of documentation.

And round and round we go.

Shattered OUT...

reply to post by asmeone2


Lee Harvey Oswald was not a novice shooter.

The rifle was a Carcano rifle chambered in 6.5 x 52mm.

Oswald was actually a very good shooter. When in the Marines he was rated as a sharpshooter.

Oswald would have had the necessary qualifications to pull off a shot like that with that kind of rifle.

Shattered OUT...

Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

 

We did go to the moon...

And so if Discovery and History channel are bad, then what form of televised media can we use? The channel you broadcast?

Shattered OUT...

I will post it again. What was I supposed to answer? What did you ask me to back up? Get back on topic or actually ask whatever it is that I have not answered or move on.

I have reposted your "questions" for the second time now. Am I missing something?

Like I said, it is cute what you are doing but anyone that can read, can see your game now.

As I said, you cannot trust the television. You just can't sorry. You want me to tell you what TV you can trust and I answered you. None.

Back to Kennedy now.