It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OT stop derailing the thread i balme you entirely
Originally posted by noobfun
thats evolution in a loose nut shell now lets see what ya got to disprove it
and remeber if it doesnt fit within this deffinition its not evolution, sorry no wet rock strawmen allowed
Darwin unified the thoery and came up with NATURAL SELECTION he invented the driving mechanism that made what his grandfarther thought actually work
1. Darwin's Theory - I use this term for the evolutionary crapola theory because that is how most people know it. But let's clear the air about that one right off the bat. It isn't even Darwin's Theory it was his grandfather's Erasmus Darwin, that is correct folks that racist crapola book was plagiarized by Darwin. But let's go farther back than Erasmus shall we? Aristotle, Plato and Socrates were the first to discuss these theories, so Darwin was centuries late to the game for the record.
2. Darwin's Book - The Origin of Species you see a lot of people calling it and there can only be two reasons why they call it that. They are ignorant and never read it or they understand the racist nature of the REAL TITLE and refuse to admit they hold to a Racist theory. So what pray tell is the full Title of Darwin's plagiary? "The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or the PRESERVATION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE". There it is for the entire ATS world to see
its updated as it needed to on new evidence
3. Darwin's Theory has changed - Well yes it has but that is only because it's crap and every time part of it gets disproven they HAVE TO CHANGE IT. They had Darwinist, then Neo-Darwinist, and today we have punctuated equilibrium but they all are based on Darwin's crap theory. So when I say Darwin's Theory it can be a version of the fabled theory which has been disproved over and over and over. Did I say over and over?
really you should try school its a wonderful place you might learn somthing
4. Wet Rocks - The theory as it is taught in schools is WET ROCKS, and to deny this FACT is to be either a liar or IGNORANT
Now that is he condensed (soup) version of the theory as it is taught
try making some?
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
I anxiously await the brainiacs answers to my queries!
which ever organism is the fittest
Which Race is the Favoured one?
hahah this wouldnt be natural selection so not evolution either
Which Race should we wipe out?
NOW THIS WE CAN DEBATE proof?
Why has most scientists distanced themselves from Darwin and gone to I.D.?
it isnt ask the courts ID is creationism in a funny hat and comedy glasses
Why is I.D. a little green man and not GOD?
that would be evolution
And mostly, if little green men did seed the planet...
WHO CREATED THEM?
why not read a book while your waiting trust me it may be a novel experience but hey you only live once
with baited breathe....
Biological evolution ... is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest proto-organism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions."
"In fact, evolution can be precisely defined as any change in the frequency of alleles within a gene pool from one generation to the next."
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
I anxiously await the brainiacs answers to my queries! Which Race is the Favoured one?
Why has most scientists distanced themselves from Darwin and gone to I.D.?
Why is I.D. a little green man and not GOD?
And mostly, if little green men did seed the planet...
WHO CREATED THEM?
I know that scientists tried fr 30 years with fruit flies to get one and couldn't and I also know that no credible Scientist in the world claims a beneficial mutation and that mutations are damaged gene codes and the offspring either die right out, can not reproduce, or they reproduce back to the normal state.
I will not accept Sickle Cell either as a beneficial mutation because people with it don't get malaria, although true they die faster and quicker from other things so this can not be beneficial. Don't believe me, ask someone with Sickle Cell Anemia