It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by tezzajw
NORAD was inept. It did not send up interceptors in time to shoot down any of the alleged aircraft.
posted by pinch
Did you have prescient knowledge of where the hijacked aircraft were going?
posted by JPhish
you might think this is a rhetorical question, but it is in fact a trick question, as there were no commercial airliners hijacked and used as weapons on 9-11. This is called misdirection.
posted by pinch
The fact of the matter is the aircraft were launched as soon as they possibly could, when the intelligence and information was solid enough to know something needed to be done.
posted by tezzajw
NORAD was inept. It did not send up interceptors in time to shoot down any of the alleged aircraft.
Originally posted by JPhish
Originally posted by pinch
Did you have prescient knowledge of where the hijacked aircraft were going?
you might think this is a rhetorical question, but it is in fact a trick question, as there were no commercial airliners hijacked and used as weapons on 9-11. This is called misdirection.
[edit on 10/26/2008 by JPhish]
Yeah, Boone. Why were you being deceptive here?
originally posted by SPreston
There are many retired fighter and commercial pilots who have joined together and know for a fact that 9-11 was an INSIDE JOB.
No, I believe even the debunkers know 911 is a lie.
I just think this is a thread for children to come in and have their tantrum fits!
Maybe one day they will grow up, and accept they where lied too.
However, until then we grown ups have to put up with it.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by cashlink
No, I believe even the debunkers know 911 is a lie.
I just think this is a thread for children to come in and have their tantrum fits!
Maybe one day they will grow up, and accept they where lied too.
However, until then we grown ups have to put up with it.
Cashlink, here is a chance for one of you "grown-ups" to school one of us kiddies.
Which standard operating procedures were not followed that date?
You spammed it earlier, care to back it up?
I'm all ears.
a. For the purpose of clarity and conciseness in this regulation, the term "hi ack" will coversituations in which aircraft control is seized in order to go somewhere other than the scheduleddestination and when an aircraft is stolen or used without permission of the owner and or FederalAviation Administration (FAA) or Transport Canada (TC) authorities. The term 'fescort aircraft" appliesto any military aircraft assigned to the escort mission.
b. Escort missions are requested by the FAA or TC. The Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) or CanadianChief of Defence Staff (CDS) may task NORAD to escort aircraft in the event of a hijacking. Escortmissions are coordinated between NORAD units and other military and civilian agencies to preventinterference with military operations, avoid possible international incident and provide safety of flight. NORAD REGULATION 55-7
Originally posted by Boone 870
, the term "hi ack" will...
The term 'fescort aircraft" ...