It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.911proof.com...
Which scenario is more likely from a strictly logistical perspective:
(1) An outsider sitting in a cave defeating the air defense system of the sole military superpower; or
(2) Someone like Cheney -- who on 9/11 apparently had full control over all defense, war game and counter-terrorism powers -- rigging and gaming the system?
Remember that for the attacks to have succeeded, it was necessary that actions be taken in the middle of the war games and the actual attacks which would thwart the normal military response. For example, Cheney watched flight 77 approach the Pentagon from many miles out, but instructed the military to do nothing (as shown in the testimony of the Secretary of Transportation, linked above). Could Bin Laden have done that?
www.911proof.com...
And air traffic controllers claim they were still tracking what they thought were hijacked planes long after all 4 of the real planes had crashed. This implies that false radar blips remained on their screens after all 4 planes went down, long after the military claims they purged the phantom war-game-related radar signals. Could Bin Laden have interfered with the full purging of false radar blips inserted as part of the war games? In other words, could Bin Laden have overridden the purging process so that some false blips remained and confused air traffic controllers? The answer is clear.
Originally posted by cbass
You are well intentioned but waisting your time, my friend.
Those who believe need no convicing.
Those who don't, will NEVER be convinced. Period.
This has all been done, ad nauseum and it will always end the same way. Neither side will budge and nothing is learned nor gained.
I admire your attempt though. Star and flag!!
As mentioned earlier... I'm just waiting for the 20-400 point 'random accounts' to all start piling in and starting personal attacks, ignoring the facts and detracting from the thread.
When they come.. ignore them back, don't play their game!
They are dis-info agents, plain and simple.
posted by cbass
You are well intentioned but waisting your time, my friend.
Those who believe need no convicing.
Those who don't, will NEVER be convinced. Period.
This has all been done, ad nauseum and it will always end the same way. Neither side will budge and nothing is learned nor gained.
I admire your attempt though. Star and flag!!
posted by IvanZana
Thank you for YOUR opinion but..... People are learning the truth every day and will continue to do so and articles like this help.
Thank you for reading and sharing the truth presented in the original post.
posted by cashlink
I can promise, the disinfo agents will be in this thread later, I am sure they are getting their emails now, to railroad this thread. So prepare your self! They cannot let the truth get out, they will tell you its all lies, nothing but lies, that you have lost it. They will hand wave your proof, they will tell you that you have moved the goal posts. They will ask you to prove something that is imposable; they will try to sidetrack you, also to keep you busy.
posted by GhostRider
As mentioned earlier... I'm just waiting for the 20-400 point 'random accounts' to all start piling in and starting personal attacks, ignoring the facts and detracting from the thread.
When they come.. ignore them back, don't play their game!
They are dis-info agents, plain and simple.
posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
I still don't understand why this stuff didn't hit the MSM, it's abdunantly clear that there was alot more involved than a cave dwelling saudi in one of the poorest countries of the world.
Originally posted by IvanZana
Originally posted by cbass
You are well intentioned but waisting your time, my friend.
Those who believe need no convicing.
Those who don't, will NEVER be convinced. Period.
This has all been done, ad nauseum and it will always end the same way. Neither side will budge and nothing is learned nor gained.
I admire your attempt though. Star and flag!!
Thank you for YOUR opinion but..... People are learning the truth every day and will continue to do so and articles like this help.
Thank you for reading and sharing the truth presented in the original post.
posted by cashlink
We already know that our Government was “not” caught off its guard on the morning of 911. The Government and FEMA knew the show was going to happened Heck! They been practicing these events for years this was nothing new for them. The only reason Rummy & Cheney were doing their war games that morning, was to deliberately confuse FAA, with all these blips showing up on their radar then disappearing then reappearing and so forth. The war games were distractions, while the real culprits were aloud to fly these planes in the towers. Who flew these planes will all ways be a mystery since to many high jackers are really alive, and Bin Laden is not wanted for 911.
Google Video Link |
Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically: 1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge 2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition
A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few hours immediately after the attacks. Specifically:
1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.
2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.
3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.
How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11? Were these stories prepared in advance? There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action." Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically. Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.
Google Video Link |