It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KathyT
SANAT from Project Camelot has posted this note there... related to Hidden_Hand's comment about his need to return to Rome. It comes from ABC News.
Quote from SANAT: Did the insider not mention that he went to Rome to do something negative to balance out the positivity of his message? Thought that would be a bit interesting. Wonder what he is doing there. (end quote.)
Originally posted by CythraulThere will be no H_H cult .
Originally posted by Cythraul
Or equally, the ideas found online are corrupted fragments of the concepts H_H has imparted. It's just as likely.
Please excuse me for dropping in on your discussion but I would like toshare same thoughts. First you might recall that one channeled term I have
shared for humans in 3D mode was "the masters of limitation" from Bashar: A
Blue Print for Change. Ironically from where I sit those who are at the
pinnacle of their 3D limitation mastery are those who are absolutely seduced
by the game of materialism. The concern with respect to harvest seems to be
the abyss that materialism takes one. I might add that harvest is a
potential I am happy to entertain but it is also a term that I think might
be fraught with distortion. My awareness isn't good enough yet to quantify
this statement:-)
To get to the other end of the spectrum (positive polarity) you must To get to the other end of the spectrum (positive polarity) you must
"entertain potential" and initially this means exploring consciousness, this
is not without its traps as long time members here would be fully aware. To
me this is where STO and STS is so important to have a handle on. Judging by
both of your post you have a clear understanding of this. It is interesting
that both of you have also alluded to experiences that indicate far more
than sciences' "5 sense world" in the last couple of months. So to my
statement that it is consciousness that requires exploration. To have love
you need the thought of love or the act of love and an awareness of it.
Hence consciousness. To activate the chakras I know in my own case this has
required conscious intent.
What is important for both of you is to follow your bliss with a pure intent. Realize that it is well within your capabilities to know rather than
believe. This is what makes an initiate of the law of one. The capstone of
consciousness is the key to your potential and within the ascension archives
are the tools to prove that this is more than the reality perceived in your
or my head.
Originally posted by Cons Piracy
He speaks of all these free-will guidelines but 'they' impose on the free-will of humanity on a grand scale.
Lam is known to be a link between the star systems of Sirius and Andromeda. Lam is the gateway to the Void. Its number, 71, is that of "NoThing", an apparition.
Lam, as a Great Old One, whose archetype is recognizable in accounts of UFO occupants.
Lam has been invoked to fulfill the work set afoot by Aiwass; as a reflex of Aiwass.
Lam as the transmitter to AL of the vibrations of LA via MA, the key to the Aeon of Maat.
Lam is the occult energy beaming the vibrations of Maat and may proceed from that future aeon.
Originally posted by KathyT
SANAT from Project Camelot has posted this note there... related to Hidden_Hand's comment about his need to return to Rome. It comes from ABC News.
Originally posted by MidnightLightning
Kathy,
Where at Project Camelot's web site is that posted? I could not find it.
Thanks,
J
Originally posted by KathyT
Originally posted by MidnightLightning
Kathy,
Where at Project Camelot's web site is that posted? I could not find it.
Thanks,
J
It's under General Discussions, on a thread titled "Re: Possible deep insider on another forum right now. " 4th page.
Originally posted by reconpilot
reply to post by Hidden-Hand
Oh yes ,well played Hidden hand ,well played .
but you did not tell them everything did you ?