It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by imd12c4funn
None of that matters. It was not rejected.
Waiting for proof that I did not beat this thread.
P.S. see my signature.
Originally posted by imd12c4funn
I have proven my case.
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
OK
Apparently people cannot read.
I will say this one last time.
There are plenty of 9/11 threads to troll if you just want to say stuff. I have posted a very specific goal here. If you are having trouble understanding it, U2U me. Should I really let you fill up this thread with an argument over whether or not the words "common sense" are proof? Do those words do anything at all? Can you win any court case by laying those words down as your only evidence?
NO.
This thread is about proof for the people who claim to have it. If you are running through 9/11 threads repeating "it has already been proven," or "I have already proved that," then put that proof here.
If you are a lonely narcisist that needs attention and is willing to step in front of any actual attempt at the truth just for your attention, please put it somewhere else.
I will not debate whether or not the words "Common sense" prove anything one way or the other. Proof.
PROOF
PROOF
can you read it? Have you philisophical debate over commmon sense on a thread about common sense or title it "stuff I already know," or even "I need to say something even though it has nothing to do with the thread."
Any of those seem nice places for you to go say these things. They do not fit here. I will not explain this thread again.
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
can you read it? Have you philisophical debate over commmon sense on a thread about common sense or title it "stuff I already know," or even "I need to say something even though it has nothing to do with the thread."
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
Common sense should always be in the forfront of any though process. I thought that common sense was a given. That is why I did not start a thread called "Please remind people of common sense, it is helpful when looking at evidence."
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
This is not a vague 9/11 so everyone express their opinion here thread. It has a title. Read it before posting.
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
Originally posted by KaginD
I don't understand why you are being so rude to everyone that has taken the time to read your thread and respond to it. I think that everyone has been pretty much on topic because if they were not they would have had their comments removed by the mods.
Anyway, I will attempt to answer your question. As far as proof goes, the only peice of evidence that I have been taken by was the fact that the towers fell in about 9 seconds. If you were to drop a vacuum from the top of one of the towers it would take about 10 seconds to fall at free fall speed with no resistance. How would the towers fall in under 10 seconds with each floor providing at least one second of resistance?? I would have to conclude that there was something planted, weather it was bombs or chemicals to help melt the steel. How else would they fall at free fall speed?
I am being rude for two main reasons.
[...]
The title is all they read and they came running in here to insult me.
[...]
If you have proof of anything.
Post it here.
Originally posted by MorningStar8741
reply to post by pccat
So, you are saying that you have nothing either?
LOL, forgive me for not looking at all your links before responding.
Originally posted by ryanlv
To OP,
Ok, first of all I opened this thread with the title "Proof that the governement story is true".
I found nothing having to do with the post name in your first post, its just you asking for proof from others.. and I couldn't help but think isn't that what all the other ATS threads on 9/11 conspiracies are for/aimed towards (mostly). They are all just broken down into certain topics. If there was ABSOLUTE PROOF don't you think it'd be one of the most active topics on ATS, or you'd have already heard about it.
This thread is pointless in my opinion, and I think more than a couple people already pointed that out, such as Zepherarin and JimBeam. I think this thread should be closed and deleted.
Originally posted by spines
Yes, it is off topic, but you [MorningStar] are a jackass, and are derailing your own thread for reasons unknown to me.
Want some proof?
First of all: The thread is called "Proof that the government story is true", so stop with all the "Read the title!" crap. The title is misleading, as I, and I am sure others, saw it and thought it would be showing proof that the official story is, in fact, true.
Originally posted by darkangel831
I have a quick question...
Is it alright to post a lie as the thread title?
I clicked it thinking someone had proof.
Newbie just asking here