It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by andre18
One of the fault lines runs between Japan and China, which is why Japan is known for its earthquakes. The earthquake this year happened on the other fault line – if it was HAARP you’d think they would have chosen an area of China that’s more important, the area hit is a poor part of China, hardly a logical place to target.
Originally posted by amfirst
This stuff is a bunch of bs, and it's getting old at this point. Earthquakes have been happening all around the world as of lately, but of course it;s the US fault.
I'm sorry to be confrontational here but....cloud seeding is a reality. It is certainly not perfected, but it is given a try. However it has NOTHING to do with Haarrp, and Harrp didn't cause the earthquake in China, it was a natural occurance.
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen Monday, April 28, 1997 - 8:45 a.m. EDT Cohen's keynote address at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga. The event is part of the Sam Nunn Policy Forum being hosted by the University of Georgia. Secretary Cohen is joined by Sen. Sam Nunn and Sen. Richard G. Lugar.] AND I quote directly from the defense Secretary's comments on that page ( look at the bottom of the paragraph regarding "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. "
Originally posted by andre18
One of the fault lines runs between Japan and China, which is why Japan is known for its earthquakes. The earthquake this year happened on the other fault line – if it was HAARP you’d think they would have chosen an area of China that’s more important, the area hit is a poor part of China, hardly a logical place to target.
The HAARP project offers annual open days to permit the general public to visit the facility, and makes a public virtue of openness; according to the team, "there are no classified documents pertaining to the HAARP." Each summer, the HAARP holds a summer-school for visiting students, including foreign nationals, giving them an opportunity to do research with one of the world's foremost research instruments.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
This entire batch of nonsense surrounding HAARP seems to be based on the childish notion that the HAARP array looks funny so they must be trying to destroy the world
Originally posted by welivefortheson
uk.youtube.com...
fast forward to 9.00 min and we see the same rainbow cloud affect in canada after some chemtrailing.
[edit on 16-9-2008 by welivefortheson]
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Wikipedia Article on HAARP
The HAARP project offers annual open days to permit the general public to visit the facility, and makes a public virtue of openness; according to the team, "there are no classified documents pertaining to the HAARP." Each summer, the HAARP holds a summer-school for visiting students, including foreign nationals, giving them an opportunity to do research with one of the world's foremost research instruments.
Current facilities The United States has three ionospheric heating facilities: the HAARP, the HIPAS, near Fairbanks, Alaska, and (currently offline for modifications) one at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. The European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association (EISCAT) operates an ionospheric heating facility, capable of transmitting over 1 GW [5] (1,000,000,000 watts) effective radiated power (ERP), near Tromsø in Norway. Russia has the Sura ionospheric heating facility, in Vasilsursk near Nizhniy Novgorod, capable of transmitting 190 MW ERP.
Originally posted by justamomma
Originally posted by welivefortheson
uk.youtube.com...
fast forward to 9.00 min and we see the same rainbow cloud affect in canada after some chemtrailing.
[edit on 16-9-2008 by welivefortheson]
uhm, did that region have an earthquake afterward? If not, then I see no proof. If so, then I still see no proof. Yeah yeah! I know you are thinking I am close minded, but I assure you I am not. However, I am not so open minded that I let my mind fill up with random crap I read on the internet or see from vids on youtube.
This isn't proof. Where is the sun in relation to the moisture that is visible in the form of a C L O U D? That might be the reason for the rainbow effect ya know If you prove where the sun is in relation to the position of the ppl and the cloud and it is in the wrong position to be giving off that illusion, then we'll talk about other possibilities. But I choose to go for the rational and rule it out before jumping to the far fetched explanation.
That's just me though not wanting to be fooled by ANYONE bc as far as I know, you have an agenda for spreading this unprovable story.
Contrails are always pure white and don�t exhibit much halo effect.� Chemtrails have an oily glint to them, with pronounced rainbow-like color effects (reddish or pinkish tint) as the sun shines through.� Some of the best photographic evidence of chemtrails is found at www.carnicom.com...
The monitoring of the electrostatic field on the eve of the strong earthquakes detect its ultra-low-frequency perturbations with a period of a few hours (10-4Hz) and a magnitude of the order of 10 V/cm. Usually this field is on the level of one V/cm. The anomalous electric field as a forerunner of the coming earthquake considerably increases a concentration of the metal ions (sodium) in the E-domain at altitudes ~120 km and the electron concentration, as well. In particular, the latter may enlarge by one order comparing with the initial electron concentration in this domain. The typical dimensions of this layer are ~ 100 km in a length and ~ 10 km in a thickness. The perturbations of this electric field form a layer with higher than usual concentration of sodium ions and atoms in the E- ionosphere and the field will heats-up electrons in this layer. Simple evaluations show the electron temperature in this layer in the presence of the seismogenic electric field is approximately about 1000-1300K at altitudes 100-120 km provided that the electric field is ~ 10-3 V/cm. It is important the cross-section of excitation of the nitrogen low vibration levels by electrons at this energy is anomalous and close to 5x10-15cm2. It happens to be that the eighth vibration level of a nitrogen molecule practically coincides with the first excited state of a sodium atom with energy ENa=2.1eV. Thus, the resonant transfer of the vibration energy of excited nitrogen with excitation of a sodium atom takes place practically in every collision. Our evaluation of the sodium doublet intensity due to the above-discussed mechanism from the ionosphere layer, mentioned above, gives 5x10-3erg/cm2s. A comparison of this quantity with the conventional intensity of the sodium doublet from this layer 7x10-4erg/cm2s shows that the suggested mechanism provides the intensity almost by one order larger than the conventional intensity of the sodium doublet. The considerable increasing in the intensity of the sodium doublet in the spectrum of the night ionosphere can be registered by monitoring the night sky over the seismic dangerous regions.
We present results from our collection and evaluating of early warning signals from the lithosphere, atmosphere and ionosphere preceding the major earthquake events in Mexico. This study examines possible connections between anomalous changes of atmospheric and ionospheric parameters observed around the time of several strong earthquakes in Mexico (M7.8 Colima of January 21, 2003, M5.8 Oaxaca of July 18, 2004 and others). Our approach requires integral measurements of several physical and environmental parameters (electric and electromagnetic fields, air conductivity, ionospheric parameters, temperature and humidity of the boundary layer, seismicity) that have been found to be associated with impending earthquakes. Our ionospheric and atmospheric observational methodology is based of joint analysis of: (1) Delta Total Electron Contents (TEC) collected from ground based GPS; (2) satellite long-wavelength radiation data form NOAA; (3) surface latent heat flux (SLHF); (4) DEMETER satellite VLF electrical field and; (5) thermal infrared (TIR) data from (NASA EOS/MODIS) together with ground air temperature and humidity measurements. This analysis revealed several types of atmosphere /ionosphere anomalies one week prior to the earthquakes that validated the alarm signals. Our latest experience from several post-earthquake independent analyses recognized the problem of proper evaluation of such alarm techniques for upcoming major (M>5.5, depth
[edit on 17-9-2008 by welivefortheson]
Originally posted by welivefortheson
reply to post by Blaine91555
on the previous page i explained it.
you dont need a sattelite, electromagnetism can be bounced of the ionosphere to target location ,its how the radio network works.