It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
not sure why it would offend but do you have anything to suggest it was something different. All the facts are there so people can believe whatever they want even if its the belief that it was aliens.
Originally posted by thetiler
After going through all this, to say it is a "cloud" is one of the stupidest things I've read at ATS.
Sorry if I offends, it almost reeks of a disinformation agent Or one who LOVES to go against truth.
I have no idea. I imagine they don't care anymore since the investigation is over. I'm not an expert on this case, why would you ask me?
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Has any of the multitude of experts, pilots, witnesses, ground officials, radar controllers locked onto the cloud theory? Just asking.
edit on 24-2-2013 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tearman
In the summary of communication between the airliner and traffic controllers, there is no mention of the UFOs more amazing attributes. When did those details emerge?
OP: The link for "Statement of Captain Terauchi, Pilot of JAL Flight 1628" is missing.
EDIT: Aaaand I see this thead is 5 years old. Well, if you're still out there OP, you have a missing link in post 1.edit on 24-2-2013 by Tearman because: (no reason given)
I suppose you could call Dr. Macabee an expert on the case. He investigated it and had a full package of FAA data. And his report indicates that it was actually the captain who pointed out the radar reflection was green, like a cloud:
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Has any of the multitude of experts, pilots, witnesses, ground officials, radar controllers locked onto the cloud theory? Just asking.
So, obviously what happened here is the captain reported it had a radar signature like a cloud, so he was wondering what kind of alien metals may have caused a cloud-like radar return. It's not clear if he actually considered whether it might be a cloud. Also, Dr. Maccabee didn't seem very impressed with the "mothership" claim and called it "weak":
In commenting on the radar image the captain pointed out
that "normally it appears in red when an aircraft radar catches another aircraft" whereas green
is usually the color of a weak weather target such as a cloud. The fact that the echo was green
on the screen led him to ask whether or not the "metal used in the spaceship is different from
ours."(2) One might also speculate on the use of radar signature reduction techniques generally
calssified as "stealth." At any rate, the shape, size and color of the radar target indicated
that the object was quite large and yet quite a weak reflector.
Note that Dr. Maccabee recognizes as the flight engineer did, that there are really two separate things going on here (the "mothership", which I think is a cloud, and the lights, which I think may be airport lights). And he's making this statement about the "silhouette of a gigantic spaceship" being "weak" in the thread where the image of the cloud was posted, so he doesn't seem to be arguing very passionately against it being a cloud, quite the contrary, he calls it a "weak" UFO event.
Personally I think that the initial sighting of two objects in front of the plane, seen by the whole crew, is a "strong" UFO event. However the "silhouette of a gigantic spaceship" by the captain alone is a "weak" UFO event. Too bad the crew didn't speak English better.
Not to my knowledge, but there would have potentially been some other sources that weren't explored....what about the co-pilot? I can't find any record if anybody asked him if he also felt the heat, but that would be interesting to know. If there had been a translator available they probably would have been asked a lot more questions, but since there wasn't, the language barrier prevented any extensive debriefing when they landed. However apparently interviewers did ask the other crew members if they ever saw the "mothership", and apparently they didn't. Only the captain saw that, according to Dr. Maccabee.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
The ONLY way to rule out a psychological explaination for the feeling of heat on the captains face is to have a recorded temprature of the plane. Would that exist?
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Has any of the multitude of experts, pilots, witnesses, ground officials, radar controllers locked onto the cloud theory? Just asking.
edit on 24-2-2013 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)
So, the expert says the cloud is a "plausible" explanation for that part of the sighting, as indeed it certainly is.
Maccabee conceded:
"It seems at least plausible that he may have misinterpreted oddly lighted clouds which the crew had reported to be below the aircraft. Although the several ground radar returns behind the jet were intriguing, the failure of the radar to show a continuous track of some unknown primary target makes the radar confirmation ambiguous at best...
Dr. Maccabee probably spent more time investigating this case than anybody else I know of, and he says the cloud explanation is plausible. I'm sure he's not offended, as I also am not offended. You're free to believe whatever you like, however I note that Dr. Maccabee has written extensively regarding facts of the case, and you offer no facts but just an opinion.
Originally posted by thetiler
After going through all this, to say it is a "cloud" is one of the stupidest things I've read at ATS.
Sorry if I offends, it almost reeks of a disinformation agent Or one who LOVES to go against truth.
Not to my knowledge, but there would have potentially been some other sources that weren't explored....what about the co-pilot? I can't find any record if anybody asked him if he also felt the heat, but that would be interesting to know. If there had been a translator available they probably would have been asked a lot more questions, but since there wasn't, the language barrier prevented any extensive debriefing when they landed. However apparently interviewers did ask the other crew members if they ever saw the "mothership", and apparently they didn't. Only the captain saw that, according to Dr. Maccabee
Steucke said the pilot, co-pilot and flight engineer have told the same story: Blinking yellow, amber and green lights appeared too close to their plane for comfort.
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by draknoir2
Regardless of what the pilot felt as heat, this much is evident. It appears something inexplicable was out there with the flight crew.
Regardless of how this story is turned, twisted, altered, those three men told the same consistent story of things seen that were inexplicable. They all saw blinking lights. The pilot claimed he saw and felt a little bit more.
Steucke said the pilot, co-pilot and flight engineer have told the same story: Blinking yellow, amber and green lights appeared too close to their plane for comfort.
edit on 25-2-2013 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jaellma
Regardless of how this story is turned, twisted, altered, those three men told the same consistent story of things seen that were inexplicable. They all saw blinking lights. The pilot claimed he saw and felt a little bit more.
Steucke said the pilot, co-pilot and flight engineer have told the same story: Blinking yellow, amber and green lights appeared too close to their plane for comfort.
edit on 25-2-2013 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by draknoir2
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Not sure, but I vaguely recall in the documentary "Black Box UFOs" some mention of the co-pilot not wishing to go on record.
I'll have to watch it again to be sure.
edit on 25-2-2013 by draknoir2 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by draknoir2
Regardless of what the pilot felt as heat, this much is evident. It appears something inexplicable was out there with the flight crew.
Regardless of how this story is turned, twisted, altered, those three men told the same consistent story of things seen that were inexplicable. They all saw blinking lights. The pilot claimed he saw and felt a little bit more.
Steucke said the pilot, co-pilot and flight engineer have told the same story: Blinking yellow, amber and green lights appeared too close to their plane for comfort.
edit on 25-2-2013 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)
But since we see the cloud on satellite, and they flew right past it, this is more compelling and not perplexing at all. The sky to the east was dark, so it's entirely possible any clouds in that direction couldn't be seen until backlit or otherwise illuminated. In fact the captain's description of a "silhouette" infers this is what happened, that it was backlit, possibly by some lights on the ground.
Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by draknoir2
Agreed.
Plus the most telling thing is the flight crew all said it was a clear sky, especially below them, so the cloud theory was perplexing to them.